Clinical Impact of a Sepsis Alert System Plus Electronic Sepsis Navigator Using the Epic Sepsis Prediction Model in the Emergency Department

被引:2
|
作者
Schertz, Adam R. [1 ,3 ]
Smith, Sydney A. [2 ]
Lenoir, Kristin M. [2 ]
Thomas, Karl W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Wake Forest Univ, Bowman Gray Sch Med, Sect Pulmonol, Crit Care Allergy & Immunol Dis,Dept Internal Med, Winston Salem, NC USA
[2] Wake Forest Univ, Bowman Gray Sch Med, Dept Biostat & Data Sci, Div Publ Hlth Sci, Winston Salem, MS USA
[3] Atrium Hlth Wake Forest Baptist, 1 Med Ctr Blvd, Winston Salem, NC 27157 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE | 2023年 / 64卷 / 05期
关键词
Epic Sepsis Prediction Model; Predicting Sepsis Score; sepsis alert; sepsis navigator; sepsis bundle; ORGAN FAILURE ASSESSMENT; SEPTIC SHOCK; MORTALITY; SCORE; DEFINITIONS; ANTIBIOTICS; GUIDELINE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jemermed.2023.02.025
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
-background: The Epic Sepsis Prediction Model (SPM) is a proprietary sepsis prediction algorithm that calculates a score correlating with the likelihood of an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision code for sepsis. Objective: This study aimed to assess the clinical impact of an electronic sepsis alert and navigator using the Epic SPM on time to initial antimicrobial delivery. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of a nonrandomized intervention of an electronic sepsis alert system and naviga-tor using the Epic SPM. Data from the SPM site (site A) was compared with contemporaneous data from hospitals within the same health care system (sites B-D) and histor-ical data from site A. Nonintervention sites used a systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS)-based alert with-out a sepsis navigator. Results: A total of 5368 admissions met inclusion criteria. Time to initial antimicrobial delivery from emergency department arrival was 3.33 h (interquar-tile range [IQR] 2.10-5.37 h) at site A, 3.22 h (IQR 1.97-5.60; p = 0.437, reference site A) at sites B-D, and 6.20 h (IQR 3.49-11.61 h; p < 0.001, reference site A) at site A histori-cal. After adjustment using matching weights, there was no difference in time from threshold SPM score to initial an-timicrobial between contemporaneous sites. Adjusted time to initial antimicrobial improved by 2.87 h ( p < 0.001) at site A compared with site A historical. Conclusions: Imple-mentation of an electronic sepsis alert system plus navigator using the Epic SPM showed no difference in time to initial antimicrobial delivery between the contemporaneous SPM alert plus sepsis navigator site and the SIRS-based electronic alert sites within the same health care system. (c) 2023 Else-vier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:584 / 595
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Clinical Impact of a Sepsis Alert System Using the Epic Sepsis Prediction Model
    Schertz, A. R.
    Smith, S. A.
    Lenoir, K. M.
    Thomas, K. W.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2022, 205
  • [2] SEPSIS ALERT SYSTEM IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT EXPEDITES SEPSIS BUNDLE CARE
    Trammell, Aaron
    Russ, Stephan
    Wrenn, Keith
    Jones, Ian
    Wheeler, Arthur
    Hooper, Michael
    Rice, Todd
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2010, 38 (12) : U112 - U112
  • [3] Alert! Alert! A Patient With Sepsis Is in the Emergency Department!
    Robinson, Kassandra
    CRITICAL CARE NURSE, 2012, 32 (02) : E26 - E27
  • [4] VALIDATING THE EPIC SEPSIS INPATIENT PREDICTIVE ANALYTIC TOOL AS A SEPSIS ALERT SYSTEM
    Cull, John
    Blackhurst, Dawn
    Kothari, Shanu
    Pellizzeri, Katherine
    Spoor, Kristen
    Manning, Benjamin
    Brevetta, Robert
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2021, 49 (01) : 621 - 621
  • [5] Analysis of Missed Sepsis Patients in a Pediatric Emergency Department With a Vital Sign-Based Electronic Sepsis Alert
    Souganidis, Ellie
    Abbadessa, Mary Kate
    Ku, Brandon
    Minich, Christian
    Lavelle, Jane
    Zorc, Joseph
    Balamuth, Fran
    PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE, 2022, 38 (01) : E1 - E4
  • [6] How Useful Is the Epic Sepsis Prediction Model for Predicting Sepsis?
    Lyons, P. G.
    Ramsey, B.
    Simkins, M.
    Maddox, T. M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2021, 203 (09)
  • [7] Sepsis electronic surveillance and clinical outcomes: impact over mortality of a sepsis early detection electronic rule implemented in the emergency department
    P Martin-Rico
    A Valdivia-Perez
    MD Marco-Lattur
    J Chorda-Ribelles
    N Lozano-Cortell
    P Olcina-Lloret
    R Andres-Navarro
    E Mateo-Sanchis
    M Jordan-Lluch
    O Esparcia-Rodriguez
    J Magraner-Egea
    J Lacalle-Martinez
    A Barcelo-Lopez
    Critical Care, 18 (Suppl 2):
  • [8] EFFICACY OF A SEPSIS CLINICAL DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM IN IDENTIFYING PATIENTS WITH SEPSIS IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT
    Hou, Yueh-Tseng
    Wu, Meng-Yu
    Chen, Yu-Long
    Liu, Tzu-Hung
    Cheng, Ruei-Ting
    Hsu, Pei-Lan
    Chao, An-Kuo
    Huang, Ching-Chieh
    Cheng, Fei-Wen
    Lai, Po-Lin
    Wu, I-Feng
    Yiang, Giou-Teng
    SHOCK, 2024, 62 (04): : 480 - 487
  • [9] Emergency Department Severe Sepsis Alert and Practice Protocol
    Williams, Darleen A.
    Breault, Katrin
    CLINICAL NURSE SPECIALIST, 2011, 25 (02) : 83 - 83
  • [10] IMPACT OF THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT SEPSIS SCREENING TOOL ON OUTCOMES IN PATIENTS WITH SEPSIS
    Shah, Tanvi
    Rech, Megan
    Sterk, Ethan
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2016, 44 (12)