Can renewable energy portfolio standards and carbon tax policies promote carbon emission reduction in China?s power industry?

被引:61
作者
Meng, Xin [1 ]
Yu, Yanni [1 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Univ, Inst Blue & Green Dev, Weihai, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Renewable portfolio standards; Carbon tax policy; Carbon emission reduction; System dynamics; ELECTRICITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113461
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The carbon emissions of the power industry in China rank the highest among all industries. There is an urgent need to explore the development path of the power industry under carbon peaking and carbon neutrality. Renewable portfolio standards (RPS) and carbon tax policy are effective policy instruments for realizing the low-carbon transition in the power industry. When both RPS and carbon tax policy are implemented, can they drive carbon reduction in the power industry? This paper constructs an electricity market equilibrium model and a system dynamics (SD) model to analyse the impact of multiple policies in electricity markets to address this question. There were several important results. (1) The increase in quota ratio and carbon tax price negatively impacts the generation of thermal power firms, which raises their willingness to invest in renewable energy. (2) The intensity of emissions reduction has a significant influence on the effectiveness of emissions reduction. The greater the emissions reduction intensity, the better the carbon emissions reduction effect, but the power supply declines. (3) Under multiple policies, green power firms choose cost padding to achieve profit maximization goals, which reduces green power generation and leads to market inefficiency.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Mitigating size bias for carbon pricing in small Asia-Pacific countries: Increasing block carbon tax [J].
An, Yunfei ;
Zhou, Dequn ;
Wang, Qunwei ;
Shi, Xunpeng ;
Taghizadeh-Hesary, Farhad .
ENERGY POLICY, 2022, 161
[2]  
Bo M., 2018, APPL ENERG, V230
[3]   The general equilibrium impacts of carbon tax policy in China: A multi-model comparison [J].
Cao, Jing ;
Dai, Hancheng ;
Li, Shantong ;
Guo, Chaoyi ;
Ho, Mun ;
Cai, Wenjia ;
He, Jianwu ;
Huang, Hai ;
Li, Jifeng ;
Liu, Yu ;
Qian, Haoqi ;
Wang, Can ;
Wu, Libo ;
Zhang, Xiliang .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2021, 99
[4]  
China Electricity Council, 2020, 2020 2021 NAT EL SUP
[5]  
China National Study Group on Climate Change, 2020, STUD CLIM CHANG CHIN
[6]  
Currier Kevin M., 2016, POWER J, V29, P1
[7]  
Daan H., 2019, J HIGH ENERGY PHYS, V128
[8]   Developing a framework for renewable technology portfolio selection: A case study at a R&D center [J].
Davoudpour, Hamid ;
Rezaee, Sara ;
Ashrafi, Maryam .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2012, 16 (06) :4291-4297
[9]  
Debin F., 2019, ENERG POLICY, V135
[10]  
Ge W., 2019, ENERG POLICY, V125