Causal theories of the moving spotlight

被引:0
作者
Jhou, Nihel H. H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Taiwan Univ, Dept Philosophy, 1,Sec 4,Roosevelt Rd, Taipei, Taiwan
关键词
causation; presentness; the moving spotlight theory; the Sarvastivada; time; BUDDHIST; TIME;
D O I
10.1111/rati.12369
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
This paper brings together the Sarvastivada (a major school of Abhidharma Buddhism) and Miller's (2019) moving spotlight theory to see how presentness is explained in terms of causation. The paper argues that a causal theory of presentness like Miller's encounters a dilemma: causation is either synchronic or diachronic, but neither is safe in the presence of the challenges. On the one hand, if causation is synchronic, how does a causal chain extend over time so that the wave of causation (and hence the spotlight) can move at all? On the other, if causation is diachronic, then a present moment has a temporal extension enough to accommodate a cause and its proximate effect. The paper proposes a synchronic notion of causation that counters the first challenge. This can be done by bringing together the Sarvastivadin grasp-production model of causation, some Stoic ideas about causation, and some Armstrong's metaphysics.
引用
收藏
页码:99 / 110
页数:12
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
Anjum RaniLill., 2018, Causation in Science and the Methods of Scientific Discovery
[2]  
Armstrong D.M., 1989, UNIVERSALS OPINIONAT
[3]  
Aung S. Z., 1915, POINTS CONTROVERSY S
[4]  
Bernstein S., 2017, BEING FREEDOM METHOD, P80
[5]  
Bigelow J, 1996, NOUS, P35
[6]  
Cameron R., 2015, The Moving Spotlight
[8]  
Cox Collett., 1995, Disputed Dharmas, Early Buddhist Theories on Existence: An Annotated Translation of the Section on Factors Dissociated from Thought from Sanghabhadra's Nyayanusara
[9]   Philosophical Arguments Against the A-Theory [J].
Deasy, Daniel .
PACIFIC PHILOSOPHICAL QUARTERLY, 2018, 99 (02) :270-292
[10]  
Dessein, 1998, SAMYUKTABHIDHARMAHRD