Linking decentralization in decision-making to resilience outcomes: a supply chain orientation perspective

被引:18
作者
Adana, Saban [1 ]
Manuj, Ila [2 ]
Herburger, Michael [3 ]
Cevikparmak, Sedat [4 ]
Celik, Hasan [5 ]
Uvet, Hasan [6 ]
机构
[1] John Carroll Univ, Dept Management Mkt & Supply Chain, Boler Coll Business, Cleveland, OH 44118 USA
[2] Univ North Texas, Dept Mkt & Logist, Denton, TX USA
[3] Univ Appl Sci Upper Austria, Supply Chain Risk Management Resilience & Secur, Fac Management, Steyr, Austria
[4] Desales Univ, Center Valley, PA USA
[5] Robert Morris Univ, Rockwell Sch Business, Moon Township, PA USA
[6] Georgia Gwinnett Coll, Sch Business, Lawrenceville, GA USA
关键词
Supply chain orientation; Decentralization; Supply chain resilience; Agility; Collaboration; Situational awareness; DYNAMIC-CAPABILITIES; ORGANIZATIONAL-STRUCTURE; MARKET ORIENTATION; SCALE DEVELOPMENT; LOGISTICS; ANTECEDENTS; DISRUPTIONS; FRAMEWORK; INFORMATION; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1108/IJLM-07-2022-0308
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
PurposeGlobal supply chains are increasingly becoming more prone to high-impact disruptions, which has been fairly evident with the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The capacity to address disruptions is essential for the survival of any organization. Coping with increasing complexity and uncertainties requires a systemic view of supply chains. Furthermore, a comprehensive understanding of the governance structure and timely decision-making are critical in times of disruptions. Although several aspects of supply chain resilience (SCRES) are broadly studied in the literature, the relationship between supply chain orientation (SCO), decentralization in decision-making and SCRES is an understudied area.Design/methodology/approachThis study takes a longitudinal approach to address this research gap with a comprehensive meta-analytic review to explore the relationships between the constructs of interest through the lenses of contingency and dynamic capability theories. Furthermore, 2 surveys with sample sizes of 250 and 200 were conducted with supply chain professionals to test the research framework before and after the pandemic to compare the findings.FindingsStructural Equation Modeling (SEM) analysis indicates a positive relationship between SCO and decentralization and between decentralization and SCRES. The post-COVID-19 analysis further validates the influence of agility, collaboration and situational awareness related to decentralization and resilience. More importantly, capabilities have a higher impact on resilience during the pandemic than before.Practical implicationsThe results entreat organizations to attain decentralized decision-making vis-a-vis dedicated functional teams charged with reacting timely to disruptions. The teams should be empowered to leverage their knowledge and experiences regardless of their position in the hierarchy.Originality/valueAlthough SCRES is an active research stream, the structural aspects of SCRES and its relationship with SCO are understudied. Therefore, this research puts forth a research framework and empirically tests hypotheses that frame the relationship between SCO, decentralization and resilience outcomes in pre- and post-COVID environments.
引用
收藏
页码:256 / 280
页数:25
相关论文
共 136 条
[1]   A systematic mapping review exploring 10 years of research on supply chain resilience and reconfiguration [J].
Al Naimi, Maryam ;
Faisal, Mohd. Nishat ;
Sobh, Rana ;
Bin Sabir, Lamay .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LOGISTICS-RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2022, 25 (08) :1191-1218
[2]   Organic structure and organisational learning as the main antecedents of workforce agility [J].
Alavi, Somaieh ;
Abd Wahab, Dzuraidah ;
Muhamad, Norhamidi ;
Shirani, Behrooz Arbab .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2014, 52 (21) :6273-6295
[3]   Analysing supply chain resilience: integrating the constructs in a concept mapping framework via a systematic literature review [J].
Ali, Abubakar ;
Mahfouz, Amr ;
Arisha, Amr .
SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2017, 22 (01) :16-39
[4]   Firm's resilience to supply chain disruptions: Scale development and empirical examination [J].
Ambulkar, Saurabh ;
Blackhurst, Jennifer ;
Grawe, Scott .
JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2015, 33-34 :111-122
[5]   Organizational social capital, structure and performance [J].
Andrews, Rhys .
HUMAN RELATIONS, 2010, 63 (05) :583-608
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2018, RES STUD 32 S P 500
[7]  
Arani W., 2016, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, V6, P1, DOI [https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v6-i10/2317, DOI 10.6007/IJARBSS/V6-I10/2317]
[8]   Dynamic Capabilities: A Review of Past Research and an Agenda for the Future [J].
Barreto, Ilidio .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2010, 36 (01) :256-280
[9]   Resilience: the concept, a literature review and future directions [J].
Bhamra, Ran ;
Dani, Samir ;
Burnard, Kevin .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2011, 49 (18) :5375-5393
[10]   An Empirically Derived Framework of Global Supply Resiliency [J].
Blackhurst, Jennifer ;
Dunn, Kaitlin S. ;
Craighead, Christopher W. .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS LOGISTICS, 2011, 32 (04) :374-391