Does new energy demonstration city policy curb air pollution? Evidence from Chinese cities

被引:24
作者
Wang, Shanyong [1 ]
Ma, Ling [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sci & Technol China, Sch Publ Affairs, Hefei 230026, Anhui, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
New energy demonstration city; Air pollution; Difference-in-differences methodology; Heterogeneity; Spillover effect; CONSERVATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170595
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
China has embarked on realizing a green-oriented energy structure transition with a series of policy tools. In 2014, the National Energy Administration launched a new energy demonstration city (NEDC) policy, but its effect on air pollution mitigation has not been fully examined. By employing the Difference-in-difference strategy, this study examines the effect of the NEDC policy on air pollution mitigation with Chinese prefecture-level city data. The results reveal that the NEDC policy can significantly lead to a 0.13-unit drop in SO2 emissions. The NEDC policy curbs pollution by stimulating green investments, promoting green technology innovation, advancing resource allocation efficiency, and reducing energy consumption. The effect of the NEDC policy appears to be heterogeneous under different conditions. Furthermore, this phenomenon is more conspicuous in prefectures led by older officials, where the age incentives nearing the promotion golden age threshold amplify the effects of air pollution mitigation, while those nearing retirement years exacerbate such effects. Notably, the interaction effect between environmental regulations and the NEDC policy on air pollution mitigation is elucidated. Moreover, positive spatial spillover effects extending to neighboring regions are identified, underscoring the imperative of regional collaboration and technological diffusion. Based on the findings above, several policy implications are proposed.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2014, LANCET, V383, P845, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60427-X
[2]   Synthetic Difference-in-Differences [J].
Arkhangelsky, Dmitry ;
Athey, Susan ;
Hirshberg, David A. ;
Imbens, Guido W. ;
Wager, Stefan .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2021, 111 (12) :4088-4118
[3]   Big Bad Banks? The Winners and Losers from Bank Deregulation in the United States [J].
Beck, Thorsten ;
Levine, Ross ;
Levkov, Alexey .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2010, 65 (05) :1637-1667
[4]   How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? [J].
Bertrand, M ;
Duflo, E ;
Mullainathan, S .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2004, 119 (01) :249-275
[5]  
Cao C., 2020, Management World, V36, P155, DOI [10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2020.09.014, DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.1002-5502.2020.09.014, 10.19744/j.cnki.11-1235/f.2020.0144, DOI 10.19744/J.CNKI.11-1235/F.2020.0144]
[6]   New energy demonstration city, spatial spillover and carbon emission efficiency: Evidence from China?s quasi-natural experiment [J].
Chai, Jian ;
Tian, Lingyue ;
Jia, Ruining .
ENERGY POLICY, 2023, 173
[7]   Cost of economic growth: Air pollution and health expenditure [J].
Chen, Fanglin ;
Chen, Zhongfei .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 755
[8]   Haste doesn't bring success: Top-down amplification of economic growth targets and enterprise overcapacity [J].
Chen, Jiachun ;
Chen, Xia ;
Hou, Qingsong ;
Hu, May .
JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2021, 70
[9]   The influence of increased population density in China on air pollution [J].
Chen, Jiandong ;
Wang, Bo ;
Huang, Shuo ;
Song, Malin .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 735
[10]   Is the construction of new energy demonstration cities conducive to improvements in energy efficiency? [J].
Cheng, Zhonghua ;
Yu, Xuejin ;
Zhang, Yi .
ENERGY, 2023, 263