The effects of using L1 Chinese or L2 English in planning on speaking performance among high- and low-proficient EFL learners

被引:0
作者
Liu, Yingsheng [1 ]
Yeung, Pui-sze [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hong Kong, Fac Educ, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Speaking strategy; Speech production; Language transfer; EFL; Second language learning; 1ST LANGUAGE; COMPLEXITY; ACCURACY; FLUENCY; COMMUNICATION; TIME;
D O I
10.1186/s40862-023-00210-8
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Speaking constitutes one of the main goals of learning a second language (L2). Despite the increasing attention on the role of planning and language transfer in L2 learning, the combined effect of using different languages and pre-task planning on language production remains unclear. This study investigated whether the use of different languages in planning affects speaking performance and whether the effect differs by language proficiency. A total of 84 students in Chinese universities learning English as a foreign language participated in several speaking tasks after planning using their first language (L1) Chinese or L2 English. Findings showed that using L1 in planning results in significantly higher syntactic complexity, accuracy, and fluency in speaking performance than using L2 in planning, while the difference in lexical diversity were not statistically significant. Further analysis shows that for speech accuracy, the facilitative effect of L1 was stronger among low-proficient than high-proficient learners. Findings from this study support the use of L2 learners' entire linguistic repertoire in speaking activities and provides implications on speech production theories as well as translanguaging pedagogies.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]  
Ay S., 2010, The Journal of International Social Research, V3, P83
[2]  
Bygate M., 1996, CHALLENGE CHANGE LAN, P136
[3]  
Chambers F., 1991, Language Learning Journal, V4, P27
[4]   Research on direct versus translated writing: Students' strategies and their results [J].
Cohen, AD ;
Brooks-Carson, A .
MODERN LANGUAGE JOURNAL, 2001, 85 (02) :169-188
[5]   Evaluating the comparability of two measures of lexical diversity [J].
deBoer, Fredrik .
SYSTEM, 2014, 47 :139-145
[6]  
Elder C., 2005, PLANNING TASK PERFOR, P219, DOI [DOI 10.1075/LLLT.11, DOI 10.1075/LLLT.11.14ELD]
[7]  
Elder C., 2006, IELTS Research Reports, V6, P1
[8]  
Ellis R., 2005, PLANNING TASK PERFOR, P167, DOI DOI 10.1075/LLLT.11.11ELL
[9]   The Differential Effects of Three Types of Task Planning on the Fluency, Complexity, and Accuracy in L2 Oral Production [J].
Ellis, Rod .
APPLIED LINGUISTICS, 2009, 30 (04) :474-509
[10]   Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons [J].
Foster, P ;
Tonkyn, A ;
Wigglesworth, G .
APPLIED LINGUISTICS, 2000, 21 (03) :354-375