Using Predicted Academic Performance to Identify At-Risk Students in Public Schools

被引:0
作者
Fazlul, Ishtiaque [1 ,2 ]
Koedel, Cory [3 ,4 ]
Parsons, Eric [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Athens, GA USA
[2] Univ Georgia, Dept Int Affairs, Athens, GA USA
[3] Univ Missouri, Dept Econ, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
[4] Univ Missouri, Truman Sch Govt & Publ Affairs, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
关键词
at-risk students; risk measurement; school accountability policy; school funding policy; student disadvantage; LUNCH;
D O I
10.3102/01623737231212163
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Measures of student disadvantage-or risk-are critical components of equity-focused education policies. However, the risk measures used in contemporary policies have significant limitations, and despite continued advances in data infrastructure and analytic capacity, there has been little innovation in these measures for decades. We develop a new measure of student risk for use in education policies, which we call Predicted Academic Performance (PAP). PAP is a flexible, data-rich indicator that identifies students at risk of poor academic outcomes. It blends concepts from emerging early warning systems with principles of incentive design to balance the competing priorities of accurate risk measurement and suitability for policy use. In proof-of-concept policy simulations using data from Missouri, we show PAP is more effective than common alternatives at identifying students who are at risk of poor academic outcomes and can be used to target resources toward these students-and students who belong to several other associated risk categories-more efficiently.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Abedi J., 2004, Educational Researcher, V33, P4
[2]  
Abedi J., 2008, Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, V27, P17, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1745-3992.2008.00125.X
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Missouri assessment program grade-level assessments: English language arts and mathematics grades 3-8 and science grades 3 and 5
[4]  
Bass David., 2010, Education Next, V10, P67
[5]   Measuring Test Measurement Error: A General Approach [J].
Boyd, Donald ;
Lankford, Hamilton ;
Loeb, Susanna ;
Wyckoff, James .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL STATISTICS, 2013, 38 (06) :629-663
[6]  
Chingos M.M., 2016, Evidence Speaks Reports, V1, P1
[7]  
Chingos M.M., 2018, A promising alternative to subsidized lunch receipt as a measure of student poverty. Policy report
[8]   Fifty Ways to Leave a Child Behind: Idiosyncrasies and Discrepancies in States' Implementation of NCLB [J].
Davidson, Elizabeth ;
Reback, Randall ;
Rockoff, Jonah ;
Schwartz, Heather L. .
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHER, 2015, 44 (06) :347-358
[9]   Is Free and Reduced-Price Lunch a Valid Measure of Educational Disadvantage? [J].
Domina, Thurston ;
Pharris-Ciurej, Nikolas ;
Penner, Andrew M. ;
Penner, Emily K. ;
Brummet, Quentin ;
Porter, Sonya R. ;
Sanabria, Tanya .
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHER, 2018, 47 (09) :539-555
[10]   Selecting Growth Measures for Use in School Evaluation Systems: Should Proportionality Matter? [J].
Ehlert, Mark ;
Koedel, Cory ;
Parsons, Eric ;
Podgursky, Michael .
EDUCATIONAL POLICY, 2016, 30 (03) :465-500