Simultaneous enhanced oil recovery, CCUS and UHUS in shale oil reservoirs

被引:6
|
作者
Bao, Xiaolin [1 ]
Fragoso, Alfonso [1 ]
Aguilera, Roberto [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Schulich Sch Engn, Calgary, AB, Canada
关键词
CCUS and UHUS; Huff and puff(H & P) gas injection; Net zero emissions; Shale reservoirs; Geologic containment; CO2 andH2 utilization and underground; storage; HUFF N PUFF; CO2; CAPTURE; STORAGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.coal.2023.104301
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The objective of this paper is to put forward some ideas related to CO2 and H2 utilization and storage while simultaneously conducting huff and puff (H & P) gas injection to increase oil recovery. The discussed utilization (U) and storage (S) are important parts of carbon capture, utilization and storage (CCUS). However, the CO2 capture (C) is beyond the scope of this study. Underground hydrogen storage (UHS) has been studied in the past. However, this is the first paper that investigates the possibility of H & P H2 injection in shale oil reservoirs. Hence, for simplicity we are introducing the acronym UHUS to signify underground hydrogen utilization and storage. It is anticipated that the simultaneous underground utilization and storage of CO2 and H2 will contribute to achieving the goal of net zero emissions.The paper involves the analysis of a real H & P CH4 injection pilot well in the Eagle Ford shale of Texas. The procedure includes history matching the primary and H & P history of the pilot well, and then forecasting oil recovery if the H & P is continued with CH4, or if the H & P is switched to CO2 or H2 in the reservoir simulator. The success of this method relies on geologic containment, which occurs when significant hydrocarbon volumes remain over geologic time in the same general location where they were generated. The Eagle Ford shale ex-emplifies this phenomenon, with hydrocarbons showing an inverted distribution -oil at the top, condensate in the middle, and dry gas at the bottom of the structure. Geologic containment enables the implementation of H & P CH4, CO2 or H2 injection and simultaneous storage of any of the injection fluids in the shale reservoir with negligible risk of unwanted leakage.The results demonstrate that H & P CH4, CO2 or H2 gas injection can considerably boost oil recovery to 25-30% of the original oil in place (OOIP), depending on the injected gas, as compared to only 5-10% with primary recovery methods. The advantages of H & P gas injection described in this paper also have potential application in other shale reservoirs with an inverted distribution of oil, condensate and dry gas, such as the Duvernay shale in Canada, the La Luna shale in Colombia and Venezuela and the Vaca Muerta shale in Argentina. Geologic containment ensures safe and appropriate storage of CO2 and H2 with negligible possibilities of leakage at the conclusion of the H & P project. Additionally, this paper also supports a previous conclusion by Olusola et al. (2021) indicating that gas injection at higher rates for shorter durations of time (as opposed to smaller gas in-jection rates for longer periods of time) can result in substantial improvements in oil recovery. This finding holds true for CH4, CO2 and H2 injection.The novelty of this research is demonstrating the effectiveness of combining H & P CO2 or H2 injection with the underground storage of such fluids in shale reservoirs characterized by geologic containment. This combination provides a win-win situation, as it not only enhances oil recoveries significantly, but also allows for safe storage of CO2 and H2 with negligible possibilities of potential leaks.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Enhanced oil recovery in shale reservoirs by gas injection
    Sheng, James J.
    JOURNAL OF NATURAL GAS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2015, 22 : 252 - 259
  • [2] Discussion of the feasibility of air injection for enhanced oil recovery in shale oil reservoirs
    Hu Jia
    James JSheng
    Petroleum, 2017, 3 (02) : 249 - 257
  • [3] A new mechanism for enhanced oil recovery by CO2 in shale oil reservoirs
    Mahzari, P.
    Mitchell, T.
    Jones, A.
    Oelkers, E.
    IOR 2019 - 20th European Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, 2019,
  • [4] Enhanced oil recovery formulations for liquid-rich shale reservoirs
    Ogbonnaya, Onyekachi
    Suriamin, Fnu
    Shiau, Benjamin
    Harwell, Jeffrey H.
    FUEL, 2024, 368
  • [5] Mechanism of CO2 enhanced oil recovery in shale reservoirs
    Hai-Bo Li
    Zheng-Ming Yang
    Rui-Shan Li
    Ti-Yao Zhou
    He-Kun Guo
    Xue-Wei Liu
    Yi-Xin Dai
    Zhen-Guo Hu
    Huan Meng
    Petroleum Science, 2021, 18 (06) : 1788 - 1796
  • [6] Advances in improved/enhanced oil recovery technologies for tight and shale reservoirs
    Wang, Lei
    Tian, Ye
    Yu, Xiangyu
    Wang, Cong
    Yao, Bowen
    Wang, Shihao
    Winterfeld, Philip H.
    Wang, Xu
    Yang, Zhenzhou
    Wang, Yonghong
    Cui, Jingyuan
    Wu, Yu-Shu
    FUEL, 2017, 210 : 425 - 445
  • [7] Mechanism of CO2 enhanced oil recovery in shale reservoirs
    Li, Hai-Bo
    Yang, Zheng-Ming
    Li, Rui-Shan
    Zhou, Ti-Yao
    Guo, He-Kun
    Liu, Xue-Wei
    Dai, Yi-Xin
    Hu, Zhen-Guo
    Meng, Huan
    PETROLEUM SCIENCE, 2021, 18 (06) : 1788 - 1796
  • [8] Enhanced Oil Recovery in Liquid-Rich Shale Reservoirs: Laboratory to Field
    Alharthy, Najeeb
    Teklu, Tadesse
    Kazemi, Hossein
    Graves, Ramona
    Hawthorne, Steven
    Braunberger, Jason
    Kurtoglu, Basak
    SPE RESERVOIR EVALUATION & ENGINEERING, 2018, 21 (01) : 137 - 159
  • [9] Implications of Chemical-Thermal enhanced oil recovery methods in shale reservoirs
    Jing, Huang
    Davarpanah, Afshin
    COGENT ENGINEERING, 2021, 8 (01):
  • [10] A review of chemical methods and testing techniques for enhanced oil recovery in shale reservoirs
    Dordzie, Gideon
    Balhoff, Matthew
    FUEL, 2025, 394