Ergonomic risk factors analysis in remote workplace

被引:8
作者
Wodajeneh, Shemelis Nesibu [1 ]
Azene, Daniel Kitawu [1 ]
Abebe, Birhanu Beshah [1 ]
Sileyew, Kassu Jilcha [1 ]
Dadi, Gezahegn Tesfaye [1 ]
机构
[1] Addis Ababa Univ, Sch Mech & Ind Engn, Addis Ababa Inst Technol, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
关键词
Impacts; risk factors; remote workplace; workplace ergonomics; MSD; WORK; HOME; OFFICES; STRESS;
D O I
10.1080/1463922X.2022.2135788
中图分类号
TB18 [人体工程学];
学科分类号
1201 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study is to synthesise ergonomic risk factors and their consequences on the well-being of employees working from the remote workplace. A comprehensive search was conducted in 15 databases ranging from June 1996 until January 2022. All qualitative and mixed method was explored related to ergonomic risk factors in remote workplace. Two independent reviewers were selected for inclusion and assessed each study quality. A systematic review and meta-synthesis guidelines were used to synthesise the findings of the included articles. The finding indicated that 26 articles met the inclusion and quality criteria. Nine key ergonomic risk factors were identified in the remote workplace. Moreover, back pain, pain in the neck, depression and vocal disorder were the identified musculoskeletal disorder in the remote workplace. Finally, a hypothetical model, and wellness wheel, which show the relationship among the nine ergonomic risk factors, workplace wellness and musculoskeletal-disorder were proposed. Hence, awkward posture, poor working environment, psychosocial risk factors, poor work-spaces design and work overload are the most dominantly studied ergonomic risk factors. Lower and upper back pain, pain in the neck and depression are also the most studied musculoskeletal disorders that affect the well-being of employees in the remote workplace.
引用
收藏
页码:681 / 697
页数:17
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] Working from home effectiveness during Covid-19: Evidence from university staff in Indonesia
    Afrianty, Tri Wulida
    Artatanaya, I. GustiLanangSuta
    Burgess, John
    [J]. ASIA PACIFIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2022, 27 (01) : 50 - 57
  • [2] How Effective Is Telecommuting? Assessing the Status of Our Scientific Findings
    Allen, Tammy D.
    Golden, Timothy D.
    Shockley, Kristen M.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST, 2015, 16 (02) : 40 - 68
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2013, QUAL RES CHECKL
  • [4] Berlin C., 2017, Production ergonomics: designing work systems to support optimal human performance
  • [5] Bloom Nicholas., 2013, DOES WORKING HOME WO
  • [6] Buomprisco G., 2021, European Journal of Environment and Public Health, V5, pem0073, DOI [10.21601/ejeph/9705.33, 10.21601/ejeph/9705, DOI 10.21601/EJEPH/9705]
  • [7] Chatterjee, 2014, INFORMAL WORKERS HLT
  • [8] Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on management-level hotel employees' work behaviors: Moderating effects of working-from-home
    Chi, Oscar Hengxuan
    Saldamli, Asim
    Gursoy, Dogan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT, 2021, 98
  • [9] Choudhury P., 2019, WORK FROM ANYWHERE P
  • [10] Condrowati F., 2020, INT C HLTH DEV COVID, V30, P153, DOI [10.2991/ahsr.k.201125.025, DOI 10.2991/AHSR.K.201125.025]