Is corporate governance important for green bond performance in emerging capital markets?

被引:5
作者
Frecautan, Ion [1 ]
Ivashkovskaya, Irina [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Res Univ, Higher Sch Econ, Moscow, Russia
关键词
CEO duality; Emerging capital markets; Green bonds; Board independence; Corporate governance; Regulatory framework; G15; G32; G38; SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; COST; DIRECTORS; BOARDS;
D O I
10.1007/s40822-023-00249-5
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper examines the relationship between corporate governance mechanisms and their impact on green bond yield spreads for companies operating in emerging capital markets. The role of boards in mitigating ESG risks is well studied for developed countries, but there is no evidence of the impact of corporate governance on green finance for emerging capital markets. To fill in the gap, we use a unique dataset constructed with data from Thomson Reuters Refinitiv Eikon, World Bank, and Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). We study 283 green bond issues by 125 companies from 16 emerging markets with assigned ESG scores for the period between 2017 and 2022. Our findings contribute to the literature in several ways. First, we provide new evidence for the significant impact of corporate governance on green bond yield spreads in emerging capital markets. Second, we demonstrate that issuers with higher CEO power will enjoy higher green bond yields. Third, board size matters for investors in corporate green bonds from emerging capital markets and has a negative impact on the yield spread. Moreover, in the research model we account for the specific features of the country's institutional environment, such as the quality of the country's regulatory system, the capacity of the central authority and the nature of its legal system. Our findings provide evidence that only government effectiveness and rule of law indexes are significant drivers of green bond spreads, while the regulatory quality index is not.
引用
收藏
页码:175 / 212
页数:38
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]   Cash Holdings and Credit Risk [J].
Acharya, Viral ;
Davydenko, Sergei A. ;
Strebulaev, Ilya A. .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2012, 25 (12) :3572-3609
[2]   The relationship of G-Index and convertible debt issuance in the presence of restrictive covenants [J].
Akdogu, Evrim ;
Paukowits, Aysun Alp ;
Celikyurt, Ugur .
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2020, 70 :373-390
[3]   Trust, social capital, and the bond market benefits of ESG performance [J].
Amiraslani, Hami ;
Lins, Karl V. ;
Servaes, Henri ;
Tamayo, Ane .
REVIEW OF ACCOUNTING STUDIES, 2023, 28 (02) :421-462
[4]   ESG scores and cost of debt [J].
Apergis, Nicholas ;
Poufinas, Thomas ;
Antonopoulos, Alexandros .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2022, 112
[5]   The Green Bonds Premium Puzzle: The Role of Issuer Characteristics and Third-Party Verification [J].
Bachelet, Maria Jua ;
Becchetti, Leonardo ;
Manfredonia, Stefano .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (04)
[6]   Financial Performance of Government Bond Portfolios Based on Environmental, Social and Governance Criteria [J].
Badia, Guillermo ;
Pina, Vicente ;
Torres, Lourdes .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (09)
[7]   Proximity to broad bond rating change and CEO power [J].
Bajaj, Akhilesh ;
Sun, Li .
MANAGERIAL FINANCE, 2021, 47 (12) :1765-1786
[8]   The role of ESG scoring and greenwashing risk in explaining the yields of green bonds: A conceptual framework and an econometric analysis [J].
Baldi, Francesco ;
Pandimiglio, Alessandro .
GLOBAL FINANCE JOURNAL, 2022, 52
[9]   What Matters in Corporate Governance? [J].
Bebchuk, Lucian ;
Cohen, Alma ;
Ferrell, Allen .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2009, 22 (02) :783-827
[10]   What Makes Better Boards? A Closer Look at Diversity and Ownership [J].
Ben-Amar, Walid ;
Francoeur, Claude ;
Hafsi, Taieb ;
Labelle, Real .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2013, 24 (01) :85-101