Seismic response of a mid-story-isolated structure considering soil-Structure interaction in sloping ground under three-dimensional earthquakes

被引:2
作者
Wan, Feng [1 ]
Li, Cheng [2 ]
Li, Hong [1 ]
Liu, Dewen [1 ]
Yao, Shunzhong [1 ]
Lei, Min [3 ]
机构
[1] Southwest Forestry Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Kunming, Peoples R China
[2] Hebei Open Univ, Discipline Inspect & Supervis Off, Shijiazhuang, Peoples R China
[3] Southwest Jiaotong Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Chengdu, Peoples R China
基金
英国科研创新办公室; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
3D earthquakes; mid-story-isolated structure; 3D isolated bearings; SSI effect in sloping ground; seismic response; BASE-ISOLATED STRUCTURE; ISOLATION BEARING; BUILDINGS; SSI; BOUNDARY; BRIDGES;
D O I
10.3389/feart.2022.1098711
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
A mid-story-isolated structure is developed from a base-isolated structure. Mid-story-isolated structures located in sloping ground have become a research hotspot in recent years. It is important to consider the soil-structure interaction (SSI) effects and multi-dimensional earthquakes on these structures. This paper established a model of the mid-story-isolated structure considering SSI in sloping ground. An elastic-plastic time history analysis was carried out under the one-dimensional (1D), two-dimensional (2D), and three-dimensional (3D) earthquakes. Under 3D earthquakes, the traditional 2D isolated bearing has limited damping capacity. Therefore, two kinds of 3D isolated bearings were designed. Results show that the seismic response of the mid-story-isolated structure considering SSI in sloping ground can be amplified compared with that of the mid-story-isolated structure without considering SSI. The seismic response of the structure under 3D earthquakes is more significant than that under 2D earthquakes and 1D earthquakes. For the two kinds of 3D isolated bearings, the minimum reduction rate of tensile and compressive stress is about 46% compared with that of the traditional 2D isolated bearings. When the 3D isolated bearings are used, the stress of the soil foundation decreases, which is more conducive to the stability of the soil foundation.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]  
Abdel Raheem Shehata E., 2015, International Journal of Advanced Structural Engineering, V7, P11, DOI 10.1007/s40091-014-0078-x
[2]   Seismic Soil-structure Interaction: A State-of-the-Art Review [J].
Anand, Vishwajit ;
Kumar, S. R. Satish .
STRUCTURES, 2018, 16 :317-326
[3]   SSI influence on the seismic response of asymmetrical small, low-rise R/C buildings [J].
Askouni, Paraskevi K. ;
Karabalis, Dimitris L. .
STRUCTURES, 2021, 32 :1355-1373
[4]   Modified topographic amplification factors for a single-faced slope due to kinematic soil-structure interaction [J].
Assimaki, Dominic ;
Kausel, Eduardo .
JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2007, 133 (11) :1414-1431
[5]  
Baolun Wang, 2020, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, V560, DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/560/1/012097
[6]   Seismic strengthening of low-rise reinforced concrete frame structures with masonry infill walls: Shaking-table test [J].
Benavent-Climent, A. ;
Ramirez-Marquez, A. ;
Pujol, S. .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2018, 165 :142-151
[7]  
Chang K., 2012, P 15 WORLD C EARTHQU
[8]   Landslide Susceptibility Prediction Based on Remote Sensing Images and GIS: Comparisons of Supervised and Unsupervised Machine Learning Models [J].
Chang, Zhilu ;
Du, Zhen ;
Zhang, Fan ;
Huang, Faming ;
Chen, Jiawu ;
Li, Wenbin ;
Guo, Zizheng .
REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 12 (03)
[9]   Seismic performance of crack-damaged masonry wall structures via shaking table tests [J].
Choi, Youngjun ;
Park, Dawon ;
Kim, Sunwoo ;
Hong, Jung-Wuk .
STRUCTURES, 2022, 45 :2272-2291
[10]  
[杜东升 Du Dongsheng], 2016, [振动与冲击, Journal of Vibration and Shock], V35, P222