Integration of Level 3 probabilistic risk assessment for nuclear power plants with transportation simulation considering earthquake hazards

被引:1
作者
Shimada, Kazumasa [1 ]
Sakurahara, Tatsuya [2 ]
Farshadmanesh, Pegah [2 ]
Reihani, Seyed [2 ]
Mohaghegh, Zahra [2 ]
机构
[1] Japan Atom Energy Agcy, 765-1 Funaishikawa, Tokai, Ibaraki 3191184, Japan
[2] Univ Illinois Urbana Champaign UIUC, Dept Nucl, Res Lab, Sociotech Risk Anal SoTeRiA,Dept Nucl Plasma & Rad, 111 G Talbot Lab,104 South Wright St, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
关键词
Nuclear power plant; Level 3 Probabilistic Risk Assessment; Agent-based Transportation Simulation; Evacuation; Earthquake;
D O I
10.1016/j.anucene.2023.110243
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
This research improves the realism of Level 3 probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) for nuclear power plants (NPPs) to avoid subjective expert judgement by modeling the evacuation behavior of the residents and making two advancements. First, evacuation speed taken from a transportation simulation code was used as an input to the Level 3 PRA code, i.e., the MELCOR Accident Consequence Code System (MACCS). The transportation simulation code uses the Multiagent Transport Simulation (MATSim) evacuation extension software. MATSim is interfaced with MACCS, by generating input-output communication through evacuation routes and speed distributions. Integrating the agent-based transportation simulation with the Level 3 PRA code enables the explicit incorpo-ration of spatiotemporal evacuation processes into NPP offsite risk assessment. Second, this research is the first to explicitly incorporate the probability of seismic damage to roadway bridges into Level 3 PRA of NPPs. The likelihood of seismic bridge damage, given an earthquake, is estimated using the HAZUS program developed by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The road closure due to seismic damage, estimated by HAZUS, is used as input to the agent-based transportation simulation, where evacuation routes and speed dis-tributions are calculated considering the impact of seismic damage. These advancements can improve the realism of Level 3 PRA for NPPs by enhancing the evacuation analysis resolution and reducing the reliance on subjective judgment to characterize evacuation routes, speed, and seismic impact on Level 3 PRA. Integrating the trans-portation simulation and the natural hazard risk assessment with the Level 3 PRA code can also provide more in-depth causal insights for offsite risk management, such as recommending optimal evacuation routes in an emergency response plan. These contributions are demonstrated using the Sequoyah NPP case study adopted from the state-of-the-art reactor consequence analyses (SOARCA) conducted by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC).
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] ARCADIS, 2012, Evacuation Time Estimates for Sequoyah Nuclear Power Plant Plume Exposure Pathway Emergency Planning Zone
  • [2] ARCADIS, 2013, Evacuation Time Estimates for Sequoyah Nuclear Power Plant Plume Exposure Pathway Emergency Planning Zone
  • [3] SOARCA uncertainty analysis of a short-term station blackout accident at the Sequoyah nuclear power plant
    Bixler, N. E.
    Dennis, M.
    Ross, K.
    Osborn, D. M.
    Gauntt, R. O.
    Wagner, K. C.
    Ghosh, S. T.
    Hathaway, A. G.
    Esmaili, H.
    [J]. ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2020, 145
  • [4] Performing a multi-unit level-3 PSA with MACCS
    Bixler, Nathan E.
    Kim, Sung-yeop
    [J]. NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 53 (02) : 386 - 392
  • [5] An algorithm for enhancing spatiotemporal resolution of probabilistic risk assessment to address emergent safety concerns in nuclear power plants
    Bui, Ha
    Sakurahara, Tatsuya
    Pence, Justin
    Reihani, Seyed
    Kee, Ernie
    Mohaghegh, Zahra
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2019, 185 : 405 - 428
  • [6] Ehime-prefecture, 2013, Ehime Prefectural Nuclear Emergency Preparedness Zone Evacuation Measures (Evacuation Time Estimate)
  • [7] EPA, 2017, PAG Manual: Protective Action Guides and Planning Guidance for Radiological Incidents
  • [8] FEMA, 2019, Hazus Earthquake Model User Guidance
  • [9] FEMA, 2008, HAZUS-MH Estimated Annualized Earthquake Losses for the United States
  • [10] FEMA, 2020, FEMA Flood Map Service Center