Evaluation of Uterine Fibroid Vascularity Using Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Comparison with Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging

被引:0
作者
Machado, Priscilla [1 ,2 ]
Tan, Allison [1 ]
Forsberg, Flemming [1 ]
Gonsalves, Carin F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Dept Radiol, Philadelphia, PA USA
[2] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Dept Radiol, 132 South 10th St,Main 763M, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Uterine fibroids; Contrast -enhanced ultrasound; Ultrasound imaging; Magnetic resonance imaging; Vascularity; ARTERY EMBOLIZATION; RISK; EPIDEMIOLOGY; LEIOMYOMATA; AGENTS; MRI;
D O I
10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2023.11.012
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objective: The aim of the work described here was to assess uterine fibroid vascularity using contrast -enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) as compared with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods: Forty women diagnosed with symptomatic uterine fibroids scheduled for uterine artery embolization (UAE) were enrolled in this institutional review board -approved study. Before UAE, participants underwent CEUS examination with an Aplio i800 scanner (Canon Medical Systems, Tustin, CA, USA) with curvilinear array (8C1). CEUS was performed using 2.0 mL of the ultrasound contrast agent Lumason (Bracco, Milan, Italy) administered intravenously. Digital CEUS clips were acquired and randomized offline, and fibroids were characterized as hyper- or hypovascular. MRI was used as reference standard for fibroid vascularity and compared with CEUS. Results were analyzed using McNemar's test. Results: Forty participants were enrolled in the trial. One patient did not proceed with the UAE procedure and one patient refused pre -procedure MRI because of claustrophobia. Therefore, 38 participants underwent CEUS and MRI examinations before UAE. Hypervascular fibroids were seen on MRI and CEUS in 24 and 26 participants, respectively. Hypovascular fibroids were seen with MRI and CEUS in 14 and 12 participants, respectively. Fibroids characterized as hypovascular in two participants by MRI were characterized as hypervascular by CEUS. CEUS and MRI findings were similar in 36 of 38 participants, corresponding to an accuracy of 95% (p = 0.62). Conclusion: Contrast -enhanced ultrasound can accurately assess uterine fibroid vascularity, serving as a potential alternative to MRI in determination of the vascularity of uterine fibroids.
引用
收藏
页码:394 / 398
页数:5
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   The Enlarged Fibroid Uterus: Aberrant Arterial Supply via the Omental Artery [J].
Anton, K. ;
Rosenblum, N. G. ;
Teefey, P. ;
Dayaratna, S. ;
Gonsalves, C. F. .
CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2019, 42 (04) :615-619
[2]   A pictorial review of ultrasonography of the FIGO classification for uterine leiomyomas [J].
Bajaj, Suryansh ;
Gopal, Neethu ;
Clingan, Mary J. ;
Bhatt, Shweta .
ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2022, 47 (01) :341-351
[3]   Comparison ofContrast-EnhancedUltrasound Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Detection and Characterization of Uterine Leiomyomas [J].
Chhabra, Pankaj ;
Daugherty, Reza ;
LeNoir, Ann Marie ;
Grilli, Christopher ;
Makai, Gretchen ;
Patel, Nima ;
DeMauro, Christopher .
JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2021, 40 (06) :1147-1153
[4]   Uterine artery embolization vs hysterectomy in the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids: 10-year outcomes from the randomized EMMY trial [J].
de Bruijn, Annefleur M. ;
Ankum, Willem M. ;
Reekers, Jim A. ;
Birnie, Erwin ;
van der Kooij, Sanne M. ;
Volkers, Nicole A. ;
Hehenkamp, Wouter J. K. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 215 (06) :745.e1-745.e12
[5]   Non-invasive imaging - Contraindications to magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Dill, T. .
HEART, 2008, 94 (07) :943-948
[6]   A UK multicentre retrospective cohort study comparing hysterectomy and uterine artery embolisation for the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids (HOPEFUL study): main results on medium-term safety and efficacy [J].
Dutton, S. ;
Hirst, A. ;
McPherson, K. ;
Nicholson, T. ;
Maresh, M. .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2007, 114 (11) :1340-1351
[7]   Clinical applications of ultrasound contrast agents [J].
Forsberg, F ;
Merton, DA ;
Liu, JB ;
Needleman, L ;
Goldberg, BB .
ULTRASONICS, 1998, 36 (1-5) :695-701
[8]   Subharmonic imaging of contrast agents [J].
Forsberg, F ;
Shi, WT ;
Goldberg, BB .
ULTRASONICS, 2000, 38 (1-8) :93-98
[9]   ULTRASOUND CONTRAST AGENTS - A REVIEW [J].
GOLDBERG, BB ;
LIU, JB ;
FORSBERG, F .
ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1994, 20 (04) :319-333
[10]  
Gonsalves Carin, 2008, Semin Intervent Radiol, V25, P369, DOI 10.1055/s-0028-1103001