Usability and Social Consequences of the Early Identification System as a Universal Screener for Social, Emotional, and Behavioral Risks

被引:9
作者
Herman, Keith C. C. [1 ]
Reinke, Wendy M. M. [1 ]
Thompson, Aaron M. M. [1 ]
Huang, Francis C. [1 ]
Owens, Sarah [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, Missouri Prevent Sci Inst, 16 Hill Hall, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
关键词
universal screening; mental health; social consequences; prevention; PERFORMANCE FEEDBACK; STUDENT; MODEL; PREVENTION; FIDELITY; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1037/spq0000538
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
The Early Identification System (EIS) was developed to overcome many of the usability challenges of school-based behavior screeners. Several prior studies have documented the technical adequacy of the EIS. The present study expanded this work by examining the use, relevance, values implications, and social consequence of EIS implementation in a sample of 54 K-12 schools and 23,104 students in the Midwestern United States. We found that nearly all schools, teachers, and students completed the EIS as planned. Schools used the data to provide universal, selective, and indicated services to a high percentage of students identified with risks as well as to plan professional development for educators based on the screening data. Seventy-nine percent of schools implemented the EIS system with high fidelity, and fidelity was unrelated to student demographic composition within schools. These findings suggest that the EIS may overcome many of the usability barriers that plague common behavior screeners. Limitations and implications for advancing the science of social consequence evaluation are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:148 / 159
页数:12
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
American Educational Research Association American Psychological Association & National Council on Measurement in Education, 2014, Standards for educational and psychological testing
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Am Psychol, V65, P493, DOI 10.1037/a0020168
[3]   Usability of Social, Emotional, and Behavioral Assessments in Schools: A Systematic Review From 2009 to 2019 [J].
Brann, Kristy L. ;
Daniels, Brian ;
Chafouleas, Sandra M. ;
DiOrio, Courtney A. .
SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2022, 51 (01) :6-24
[4]   School Building Administrator Reports of Screening Practices Across Academic, Behavioral, and Health Domains [J].
Briesch, Amy M. ;
Chafouleas, Sandra M. ;
Dineen, Jennifer N. ;
McCoach, D. Betsy ;
Donaldson, Aberdine .
JOURNAL OF POSITIVE BEHAVIOR INTERVENTIONS, 2022, 24 (04) :266-277
[5]   A Preliminary Investigation of Emotional and Behavioral Screening Practices in K-12 Schools [J].
Bruhn, Allison Leigh ;
Woods-Groves, Suzanne ;
Huddle, Sally .
EDUCATION AND TREATMENT OF CHILDREN, 2014, 37 (04) :611-634
[6]  
Canter A. S., 2002, BEST PRACTICES SCH P, P1099
[7]  
Committee for Children, 2008, 2 STEP STUD SUCC PRE
[8]   Exploring Social, Emotional, and Behavioral Screening Approaches in US Public School Districts [J].
Dineen, Jennifer N. ;
Chafouleas, Sandra M. ;
Briesch, Amy M. ;
McCoach, D. Betsy ;
Newton, Sarah D. ;
Cintron, Dakota W. .
AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2022, 59 (01) :146-179
[9]  
Dowdy Erin, 2010, School Ment Health, V2, P166
[10]   Is Performance Feedback for Educators an Evidence-Based Practice? A Systematic Review and Evaluation Based on Single-Case Research [J].
Fallon, Lindsay M. ;
Collier-Meek, Melissa A. ;
Maggin, Daniel M. ;
Sanetti, Lisa M. H. ;
Johnson, Austin H. .
EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN, 2015, 81 (02) :227-246