Choosing a nursing specialty: connection to nursing students' personality traits, clinical self-efficacy, adoption of technology changes, and specialty prestige; a cross-sectional study

被引:3
作者
Ben Shabat, Lilach [1 ]
Itzhaki, Michal [1 ]
机构
[1] Tel Aviv Univ, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Sch Hlth Profess, Nursing Dept, Tel Aviv, Israel
关键词
Clinical self-efficacy; Nursing specialty; Nursing students; Personality traits; HEALTH-CARE WORKFORCE; NURSES;
D O I
10.1186/s12912-024-01813-3
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background Choosing a field of specialization within the nursing profession is affected by nurses' personality traits, self-confidence in performing clinical skills, and the field's prestige. A successful choice of area of expertise may improve nurses' job satisfaction and reduce job mobility. This study aims to examine the relationship between personality traits, clinical self-efficacy, perceived prestige, adoption of technological changes, and choice of specialty field among nursing students. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted. One-hundred-twenty-seven undergraduate nursing students in their fourth year of studies at a large university in Israel participated in the study. The questionnaire administered was comprised of six parts: demographic data, personality traits, adoption of technological changes, clinical self-efficacy, perceived prestige, and intention to select a field of specialization. Results Acute disciplines were rated more prestigious than chronic disciplines, with intensive care and emergency medicine considered the most prestigious, while mental health and geriatrics were the least prestigious. Students' mean perceived confidence in performing nursing clinical skills was high and more than half considered themselves open to technology changes. Positive correlations were found between prestige and intention to choose a field of expertise (r = 0.41, p < 0.001) and the personality trait of openness and the intention to choose an acute care area (r = 0.26, p < 0.01). Conclusions Despite the gradual aging of the population and the increase in chronic morbidity, which demand a greater nursing focus on older adults, and notwithstanding the mental health reforms, nursing students perceive geriatrics and mental health as less prestigious fields. A career development path can be applied by developing a tool for occupational guidance designed to rank students' suitability for specialty fields and thus help them choose the area that best suits them.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
Aggarwal Rakesh, 2016, Perspect Clin Res, V7, P187
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1991, The Big Five Inventory-Versions 4a and 54
[3]   SELF-EFFICACY - TOWARD A UNIFYING THEORY OF BEHAVIORAL CHANGE [J].
BANDURA, A .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1977, 84 (02) :191-215
[4]   The Distribution of Advanced Practice Nurses Within the Psychiatric Workforce [J].
Beck, Angela J. ;
Page, Cory ;
Buche, Jessica ;
Gaiser, Maria .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC NURSES ASSOCIATION, 2020, 26 (01) :92-96
[5]   BACK-TRANSLATION FOR CROSS-CULTURAL RESEARCH [J].
BRISLIN, RW .
JOURNAL OF CROSS-CULTURAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1970, 1 (03) :185-216
[6]   Differences in Innovative Behavior Among Hospital-Based Registered Nurses [J].
Bunpin, Jose J. Dy, III ;
Chapman, Susan ;
Blegen, Mary ;
Spetz, Joanne .
JOURNAL OF NURSING ADMINISTRATION, 2016, 46 (03) :122-127
[7]  
Etzion D., 1998, The Big Five Inventory Hebrew version
[8]   Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses [J].
Faul, Franz ;
Erdfelder, Edgar ;
Buchner, Axel ;
Lang, Albert-Georg .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2009, 41 (04) :1149-1160
[9]   Addressing the Community-Based Geriatric Healthcare Workforce Shortage by Leveraging the Potential of Interprofessional Teams [J].
Flaherty, Ellen ;
Bartels, Stephen J. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2019, 67 :S400-S408
[10]   Prestige Added to Holland's Vocational Interest Scales for the Prediction of Medical Students' Aspired Work Environments [J].
Guntern, Sabine ;
Korpershoek, Hanke ;
van der Werf, Greetje .
JOURNAL OF CAREER ASSESSMENT, 2016, 24 (02) :333-346