Cognitive bias during clinical decision-making and its influence on patient outcomes in the emergency department: A scoping review

被引:6
作者
Jala, Sheila [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Fry, Margaret [1 ]
Elliott, Rosalind [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Technol Sydney, Fac Hlth, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Royal North Shore Hosp, Neurol Dept, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
[3] Royal North Shore Hosp, Northern Sydney Local Hlth Dist, Nursing & Midwifery Res Ctr, Nursing & Midwifery Directorate, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
[4] Royal North Shore Hosp, Dept Intens Care Med, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
[5] Univ Technol Sydney, Fac Hlth, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Broadway Ultimo, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
clinical decision-making; cognitive bias; emergency nurses; emergency physicians; implicit bias; patient outcomes; IMPLICIT RACIAL/ETHNIC BIAS; UNCONSCIOUS RACE; RACIAL BIAS; PHYSICIANS; ASSOCIATION; ERRORS; PROFESSIONALS; INFORMATION; PREDICTION; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1111/jocn.16845
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
BackgroundAn integral part of clinical practice is decision-making. Yet there is widespread acceptance that there is evidence of cognitive bias within clinical practice among nurses and physicians. However, how cognitive bias among emergency nurses and physicians' decision-making influences patient outcomes remains unclear. AimThe aim of this review was to systematically synthesise research exploring the emergency nurses' and physicians' cognitive bias in decision-making and its influence on patient outcomes. MethodsThis scoping review was guided by the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews. The databases searched included CINAHL, MEDLINE, Web of Science and PubMed. No date limits were applied. The Patterns, Advances, Gaps, Evidence for practice and Research recommendation (PAGER) framework was used to guide the discussion. ResultsThe review included 18 articles, consisting of 10 primary studies (nine quantitative and one qualitative) and eight literature reviews. Of the 18 articles, nine investigated physicians, five articles examined nurses, and four both physicians and nurses with sample sizes ranging from 13 to 3547. Six primary studies were cross-sectional and five used hypothetical scenarios, and one real-world assessment. Three were experimental studies. Twenty-nine cognitive biases were identified with Implicit bias (n = 12) most frequently explored, followed by outcome bias (n = 4). Results were inconclusive regarding the influence of biases on treatment decisions and patient outcomes.Four key themes were identified; (i) cognitive biases among emergency clinicians; (ii) measurement of cognitive bias; (iii) influence of cognitive bias on clinical decision-making; and (iv) association between emergency clinicians' cognitive bias and patient outcomes. ConclusionsThis review identified that cognitive biases were present among emergency nurses and physicians during clinical decision-making, but it remains unclear how cognitive bias influences patient outcomes. Further research examining emergency clinicians' cognitive bias is required. Relevance to Clinical PracticeAwareness of emergency clinicians' own cognitive biases may result to the provision of equity in care. No Patient or Public Contribution in this reviewWe intend to disseminate the results through publication in a peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations.
引用
收藏
页码:7076 / 7085
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Calling the Shots? Adolescents' Influence on Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Decision-Making During Clinical Encounters
    Fenton, Anny T. H. R.
    Eun, Terresa J.
    Clark, Jack A.
    Perkins, Rebecca B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT HEALTH, 2020, 66 (04) : 447 - 454
  • [42] Improving clinical decision-making in psychiatry: implementation of digital phenotyping could mitigate the influence of patient's and practitioner's individual cognitive biases
    Mouchabac, Stephane
    Conejero, Ismael
    Lakhlifi, Camille
    Msellek, Ilyass
    Malandain, Leo
    Adrien, Vladimir
    Ferreri, Florian
    Millet, Bruno
    Bonnot, Olivier
    Bourla, Alexis
    Maatoug, Redwan
    [J]. DIALOGUES IN CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 23 (01) : 52 - 61
  • [43] Scope and Influence of Electronic Health Record-Integrated Clinical Decision Support in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review
    Patterson, Brian W.
    Pulia, Michael S.
    Ravi, Shashank
    Hoonakker, Peter L. T.
    Hundt, Ann Schoofs
    Wiegmann, Douglas
    Wirkus, Emily J.
    Johnson, Stephen
    Carayon, Pascale
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2019, 74 (02) : 285 - 296
  • [44] How prescription drug monitoring programs influence clinical decision-making: A mixed methods systematic review and meta-analysis
    Picco, Louisa
    Lam, Tina
    Haines, Sarah
    Nielsen, Suzanne
    [J]. DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2021, 228
  • [45] Influence of Artificial Intelligence-Driven Diagnostic Tools on Treatment Decision-Making in Early Childhood Caries: A Systematic Review of Accuracy and Clinical Outcomes
    Al-Namankany, Abeer
    [J]. DENTISTRY JOURNAL, 2023, 11 (09)
  • [46] Patient-Specific Modelling in Drug Design, Development and Selection Including its Role in Clinical Decision-Making
    Shublaq, Nour
    Sansom, Clare
    Coveney, Peter V.
    [J]. CHEMICAL BIOLOGY & DRUG DESIGN, 2013, 81 (01) : 5 - 12
  • [47] Estimation of Kinetics Using IMUs to Monitor and Aid in Clinical Decision-Making during ACL Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review
    Krishnakumar, Sanchana
    van Beijnum, Bert-Jan F.
    Baten, Chris T. M.
    Veltink, Peter H.
    Buurke, Jaap H.
    [J]. SENSORS, 2024, 24 (07)
  • [48] Patient-reported outcomes in randomised controlled trials of gynaecological cancers: Investigating methodological quality and impact on clinical decision-making
    Efficace, Fabio
    Jacobs, Marc
    Pusic, Andrea
    Greimel, Elfriede
    Piciocchi, Alfonso
    Kieffer, Jacobien M.
    Gilbert, Alexandra
    Fayers, Peter
    Blazeby, Jane
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2014, 50 (11) : 1925 - 1941
  • [49] How does physicians' decisional conflict influence their ability to address treatment outcomes in a decision-making encounter with an advanced-stage cancer simulated patient? A descriptive study
    Libert, Yves
    Peternelj, Livia
    Canivet, Delphine
    Farvacques, Christine
    Lienard, Aurore
    Menard, Catherine
    Merckaert, Isabelle
    Reynaert, Christine
    Slachmuylder, Jean-Louis
    Razavi, Darius
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2020, 103 (09) : 1752 - 1759
  • [50] Information needs, sources and seeking behaviour of physicians and residents during clinical decision-making and patient care process: A qualitative study
    Sadeghi, Halimeh
    Nowkarizi, Mohsen
    Tajafari, Masumeh
    [J]. INFORMATION DEVELOPMENT, 2023,