Improvements in disability and function in people with lower-limb amputation one year after prosthesis osseointegration

被引:8
作者
Davis-Wilson, Hope C. [1 ,2 ]
Christiansen, Cory L. [1 ,2 ]
Gaffney, Brecca M. M. [3 ,4 ]
Lev, Guy [5 ]
Enabulele, Eseosa [6 ]
Stoneback, Jason W. [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Phys Therapy Program, Anschutz Med Campus, Aurora, CO USA
[2] VA Eastern Colorado Healthcare Syst, Dept Geriatr, Geriatr Res Educ & Clin Ctr, Aurora, CO USA
[3] Univ Colorado, Dept Mech Engn, Denver, CO 80202 USA
[4] Univ Colorado, Ctr Bioengn, Anschutz Med Campus, Aurora, CO USA
[5] Univ Colorado Hosp, Aurora, CO USA
[6] Univ Colorado, Dept Orthoped, Anschutz Med Campus, Aurora, CO USA
关键词
World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0; Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale; Prosthetic Limb Users Mobility Survey; perceived function; limb loss; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; TRANSFEMORAL AMPUTATION; FOLLOW-UP; INDIVIDUALS; VIBROTACTILE; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1097/PXR.0000000000000200
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background:People with lower-limb amputation (LLA) are routinely prescribed a socket prosthesis; however, many socket prosthesis users experience severe complications with the fit of their prosthesis including residual limb wounds and pain. Osseointegration is a procedure that creates a direct connection between the bone and prosthetic limb through a bone-anchored prosthesis, eliminating the need for a socket interface. It is offered as a secondary procedure to people with LLA who experience significant complications with socket prostheses. Objectives:To evaluate change in disability and function 1 year postosseointegration compared with preosseointegration in people with LLA. Study design:Single group, pretest, and post-test.Methods:Twelve participants (9 transfemoral and 3 transtibial amputations, age: 44 10 years, 7 female participants, 14 12 years since amputation) with unilateral LLA underwent osseointegration with press-fit implants. Disability was measured with the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0, and function was measured with both Prosthetic Limb Users Mobility Survey and the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale. Questionnaires were administered preosseointegration and 1 year postosseointegration. Paired t tests assessed change in outcomes between time points. Results:Postosseointegration, participants demonstrated reduced disability measured with World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (%Delta = -52.6, p = 0.01), improved mobility measured with Prosthetic Limb Users Mobility Survey (%Delta = 21.8, P < 0.01), and improved balance confidence measured with the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale (%Delta = 28.4, P < 0.01). Conclusions:Participants report less disability and greater function in their prosthesis postosseointegration. Osseointegration is a novel procedure for people experiencing complications with their socket prosthesis, and this study is the first to show improvements in disability postosseointegration.
引用
收藏
页码:343 / 349
页数:7
相关论文
共 34 条
[11]   Outcome of Percutaneous Osseointegrated Prostheses for Patients With Unilateral Transfemoral Amputation at Two-Year Follow-Up [J].
Hagberg, Kerstin ;
Hansson, Elisabeth ;
Branemark, Rickard .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2014, 95 (11) :2120-2127
[12]   Vibrotactile evaluation: Osseointegrated versus socket-suspended transfemoral prostheses [J].
Haggstrom, Eva ;
Hagberg, Kerstin ;
Rydevik, Bjorn ;
Branemark, Rickard .
JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2013, 50 (10) :1423-1434
[13]  
Hebert JS, 2017, JBJS REV, V5, DOI 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.17.00037
[14]   Evaluation of the psychophysical detection threshold level for vibrotactile and pressure stimulation of prosthetic limbs using bone anchorage or soft tissue support [J].
Jacobs, R ;
Brånemark, R ;
Olmarker, K ;
Rydevik, B ;
Van Steenberghe, D ;
Brånemark, PI .
PROSTHETICS AND ORTHOTICS INTERNATIONAL, 2000, 24 (02) :133-142
[15]  
Judd DL., 2021, Phys Ther, V99, P1453
[16]   Error-augmentation gait training to improve gait symmetry in patients with non-traumatic lower limb amputation: A proof-of-concept study [J].
Kline, Paul W. ;
Murray, Amanda M. ;
Miller, Matthew J. ;
Fields, Thomas ;
Christiansen, Cory L. .
PROSTHETICS AND ORTHOTICS INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 43 (04) :426-433
[17]  
Klineberg I, 1999, Adv Dent Res, V13, P120
[18]   Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs [J].
Lakens, Daniel .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 4
[19]   Functional performance and safety of bone-anchored prostheses in persons with a transfemoral or transtibial amputation: a prospective one-year follow-up cohort study [J].
Leijendekkers, Ruud A. ;
van Hinte, Gerben ;
Frolke, Jan Paul ;
van de Meent, Hendrik ;
Atsma, Femke ;
Nijhuis-van der Sanden, Maria W. G. ;
Hoogeboom, Thomas J. .
CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2019, 33 (03) :450-464
[20]   The 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHO-DAS II): a nonparametric item response analysis [J].
Luciano, Juan V. ;
Ayuso-Mateos, Jose L. ;
Aguado, Jaume ;
Fernandez, Ana ;
Serrano-Blanco, Antoni ;
Roca, Miquel ;
Haro, Josep M. .
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2010, 10