The Perils of Misinterpreting and Misusing "Publication Bias" in Meta-analyses: An Education Review on Funnel Plot-Based Methods

被引:44
作者
Afonso, Jose [1 ]
Ramirez-Campillo, Rodrigo [2 ]
Clemente, Filipe Manuel [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Buttner, Fionn Cleirigh [6 ,7 ]
Andrade, Renato [8 ,9 ,10 ]
机构
[1] Univ Porto, Fac Sport, Ctr Res Educ Innovat & Intervent Sport CIFI2D, Porto, Portugal
[2] Univ Andres Bello, Exercise & Rehabil Sci Inst, Fac Rehabil Sci, Sch Phys Therapy, Santiago, Chile
[3] Inst Politecn Viana Castelo, Escola Super Desporto & Lazer, Rua Escola Ind & Comercial NunAlvares, Viana Do Castelo, Portugal
[4] Inst Telecomunicacoes, Delegacao Covilha, Covilha, Portugal
[5] Recreat Innovat & Technol SPRINT, Res Ctr Sports Performance, P-4960320 Melgaco, Portugal
[6] Queen Mary Univ London, Ctr Evaluat & Methods, Wolfson Inst Populat Hlth, Pragmat Clin Trials Unit, London, England
[7] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Dept Med Stat, London, England
[8] Univ Porto, Porto Biomech Lab LABIOMEP, Porto, Portugal
[9] FIFA Med Ctr Excellence, Clin Espregueira, Porto, Portugal
[10] Dom Henr Res Ctr, Porto, Portugal
关键词
SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; QUALITY; GRADE; GUIDELINES; STRENGTH; CARE; RECOMMENDATIONS; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1007/s40279-023-01927-9
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
Publication bias refers to a systematic deviation from the truth in the results of a meta-analysis due to the higher likelihood for published studies to be included in meta-analyses than unpublished studies. Publication bias can lead to misleading recommendations for decision and policy making. In this education review, we introduce, explain, and provide solutions to the pervasive misuses and misinterpretations of publication bias that afflict evidence syntheses in sport and exercise medicine, with a focus on the commonly used funnel-plot based methods. Publication bias is more routinely assessed by visually inspecting funnel plot asymmetry, although it has been consistently deemed unreliable, leading to the development of statistical tests to assess publication bias. However, most statistical tests of publication bias (i) cannot rule out alternative explanations for funnel plot asymmetry (e.g., between-study heterogeneity, choice of metric, chance) and (ii) are grossly underpowered, even when using an arbitrary minimum threshold of ten or more studies. We performed a cross-sectional meta-research investigation of how publication bias was assessed in systematic reviews with meta-analyses published in the top two sport and exercise medicine journals throughout 2021. This analysis highlights that publication bias is frequently misused and misinterpreted, even in top tier journals. Because of conceptual and methodological problems when assessing and interpreting publication bias, preventive strategies (e.g., pre-registration, registered reports, disclosing protocol deviations, and reporting all study findings regardless of direction or magnitude) offer the best and most efficient solution to mitigate the misuse and misinterpretation of publication bias. Because true publication bias is very difficult to determine, we recommend that future publications use the term "risk of publication bias".
引用
收藏
页码:257 / 269
页数:13
相关论文
共 79 条
[1]   Power, precision, and sample size estimation in sport and exercise science research [J].
Abt, Grant ;
Boreham, Colin ;
Davison, Gareth ;
Jackson, Robin ;
Nevill, Alan ;
Wallace, Eric ;
Williams, Mark .
JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES, 2020, 38 (17) :1933-1935
[2]   Adjusting for Publication Bias in JASP and R: Selection Models, PET-PEESE, and Robust Bayesian Meta-Analysis [J].
Bartos, Frantisek ;
Maier, Maximilian ;
Quintana, Daniel S. ;
Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan .
ADVANCES IN METHODS AND PRACTICES IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 5 (03)
[3]   OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS OF A BANK CORRELATION TEST FOR PUBLICATION BIAS [J].
BEGG, CB ;
MAZUMDAR, M .
BIOMETRICS, 1994, 50 (04) :1088-1101
[4]  
Biljana M, 1999, STUD HEALTH TECHNOL, V68, P323
[5]  
Borenstein M., 2009, Introduction to Meta-Analysis
[6]   Are questionable research practices facilitating new discoveries in sport and exercise medicine? The proportion of supported hypotheses is implausibly high [J].
Buttner, Fionn ;
Toomey, Elaine ;
McClean, Shane ;
Roe, Mark ;
Delahunt, Eamonn .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2020, 54 (22) :1365-1371
[7]   ROB-MEN: a tool to assess risk of bias due to missing evidence in network meta-analysis [J].
Chiocchia, Virginia ;
Nikolakopoulou, Adriani ;
Higgins, Julian P. T. ;
Page, Matthew J. ;
Papakonstantinou, Theodoros ;
Cipriani, Andrea ;
Furukawa, Toshi A. ;
Siontis, George C. M. ;
Egger, Matthias ;
Salanti, Georgia .
BMC MEDICINE, 2021, 19 (01)
[8]  
Copas J, 2000, Biostatistics, V1, P247, DOI 10.1093/biostatistics/1.3.247
[9]   Journal editors impasse with outcome reporting bias [J].
Dal-Re, Rafael ;
Caplan, Arthur L. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 2015, 45 (09) :895-898
[10]   Detecting small-study effects and funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analysis of survival data: A comparison of new and existing tests [J].
Debray, Thomas P. A. ;
Moons, Karel G. M. ;
Riley, Richard D. .
RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2018, 9 (01) :41-50