A case-control study to evaluate the impact of the breast screening programme on breast cancer incidence in England

被引:7
作者
Blyuss, Oleg [1 ]
Dibden, Amanda [1 ]
Massat, Nathalie J. [1 ]
Parmar, Dharmishta [1 ]
Cuzick, Jack [1 ]
Duffy, Stephen W. [1 ]
Sasieni, Peter [2 ]
机构
[1] Queen Mary Univ London, Wolfson Inst Populat Hlth, Ctr Prevent Detect & Diag, Charterhouse Sq, London EC1M 6BQ, England
[2] Kings Coll London, Fac Life Sci & Med, Sch Canc & Pharmaceut Sci, London, England
关键词
breast cancer; cancer prevention; screening; women's cancer; OVER-DIAGNOSIS; OVERDIAGNOSIS; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1002/cam4.5004
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background There is uncertainty about overdiagnosis in mammography screening. Methods We aimed to estimate the effect of screening on breast cancer incidence and overdiagnosis in the NHS Breast Screening Programme in England. The study included 57,493 cases and 105,653 controls, with cases defined as women diagnosed at ages 47-89 with primary breast cancer, invasive or ductal carcinoma in situ, in 2010 or 2011. Where possible, two controls were selected per case, matched on date of birth and screening area. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate the effect of screening on breast cancer risk, with adjustment for potential self-selection bias. Results were combined with national incidence data to estimate absolute rates of overdiagnosis. Overdiagnosis was calculated as the cumulative excess of cancers diagnosed in the age group 50-77 in a woman attending three-yearly screening between ages 50 and 70 compared with a woman attending no screens. Results The estimated number of cases overdiagnosed in women attending all screens in the programme was 679.3 per 100,000 without adjustment for self-selection bias and 261.2 per 100,000 with adjustment. These corresponded to an estimated 9.5% of screen-detected cancers overdiagnosed without adjustment and 3.7% with adjustment for self-selection. Conclusions The NHS Breast Screening Programme in England confers at worst modest levels of overdiagnosis.
引用
收藏
页码:1878 / 1887
页数:10
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], BREAST CANC INCIDENC
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2019, The R project for statistical computing
[3]   A novel case-control design to estimate the extent of over-diagnosis of breast cancer due to organised population-based mammography screening [J].
Beckmann, Kerri R. ;
Lynch, John W. ;
Hiller, Janet E. ;
Farshid, Gelareh ;
Houssami, Nehmat ;
Duffy, Stephen W. ;
Roder, David M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2015, 136 (06) :1411-1421
[4]   Do breast cancer risk factors differ among those who do and do not undertake mammography screening? [J].
Beckmann, Kerri R. ;
Roder, David M. ;
Hiller, Janet E. ;
Farshid, Gelareh ;
Lynch, John W. .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2013, 20 (04) :208-219
[5]   Effects of study methods and biases on estimates of invasive breast cancer overdetection with mammography screening: a systematic review [J].
Biesheuvel, Corne ;
Barratt, Alexandra ;
Howard, Kirsten ;
Houssami, Nehmat ;
Irwig, Les .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2007, 8 (12) :1129-1138
[6]   The changing global patterns of female breast cancer incidence and mortality [J].
Bray, F ;
McCarron, P ;
Parkin, DM .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2004, 6 (06) :229-239
[7]   Association between Screening Mammography Recall Rate and Interval Cancers in the UK Breast Cancer Service Screening Program: A Cohort Study [J].
Burnside, Elizabeth S. ;
Vulkan, Daniel ;
Blanks, Roger G. ;
Duffy, Stephen W. .
RADIOLOGY, 2018, 288 (01) :47-54
[8]  
Cancer Research UK, BREAST CANC MORALITY
[9]   An estimate of overdiagnosis 15 years after the start of mammographic screening in Florence [J].
Donella, Puliti ;
Marco, Zappa ;
Guido, Miccinesi ;
Patrizia, Falini ;
Emanuele, Crocetti ;
Eugenio, Paci .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2009, 45 (18) :3166-3171
[10]   Effect of population breast screening on breast cancer mortality up to 2005 in England and Wales: an individual-level cohort study [J].
Johns, Louise E. ;
Coleman, Derek A. ;
Swerdlow, Anthony J. ;
Moss, Susan M. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2017, 116 (02) :246-252