Is Maritime Spatial Planning a tool to mitigate the impacts of underwater noise? A review of adopted and upcoming maritime spatial plans in Europe

被引:7
作者
Bosi, Sofia [1 ]
Ramieri, Emiliano [1 ]
Picciulin, Marta [1 ]
Menegon, Stefano [1 ]
Ghezzo, Michol [1 ]
Petrizzo, Antonio [1 ]
Folegot, Thomas [2 ]
Madricardo, Fantina [1 ]
Barbanti, Andrea [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Res Council Italy, ISMAR Insitute Marine Sci, CNR, Castello 2737-F, I-30122 Venice, Italy
[2] Quiet Oceans, Technopo Brest Iroise, 525 Ave Alexis Rochon,Batiment Cap Ocean, F-29280 Plouzane, France
关键词
Underwater noise; Maritime spatial planning; MSFD; Good Environmental Status; SOUND; DISPLACEMENT; EXPOSURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.marpol.2023.105725
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Sound is essential for marine life and, as anthropogenic noise in the marine environment increases, the scientific community becomes more aware of its negative impacts on marine organisms. Noise travels long distances underwater, including across national boundaries and jurisdictions and impacts a variety of mobile species. Marine Spatial Planning (MSP) represents a useful methodology and policy framework to manage noiseproducing human activities with an ecosystem-based approach. This paper provides a picture of the current situation regarding the role of MSP in addressing underwater noise across a sample of 11 countries in Europe. A thorough analysis of their marine plans and related materials is carried out and validated through interviews with the relevant MSP experts. A vision is proposed for the potential synergies between MSP and underwater noise, defining a two-way relationship between the noise community (e.g., scientists, engineers, consultants, operators, authorities) and marine planners. This type of analysis is timely both from an MSP and an underwater noise perspective. Most EU countries have now released their MSP plans following the 2021 deadline of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive (2014) and a new phase of MSP is approaching, which will attempt to fill the gaps left by the current cycle and introduce substantial improvements. Moreover, thanks to the contributions from the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) and its Technical Group on Underwater Noise (TGNoise), quantitative rules to evaluate noise status and impacts are being defined, while a number of research projects continuously produces new and highly relevant knowledge.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 67 条
[61]  
Thomsen F., 2021, Addressing Underwater Noise in Europe: Current State of Knowledge and Future Priorities
[62]   The complex relationships between marine protected areas and marine spatial planning: Towards an analytical framework [J].
Trouillet, Brice ;
Jay, Stephen .
MARINE POLICY, 2021, 127
[63]  
Vakili S., 2018, Under-water noise pollution sources, mitigation measures in commercial
[64]   Monitoring and evaluation of maritime spatial planning-A review of accumulated practices and guidance for future action [J].
van den Burg, S. W. K. ;
Skirtun, M. ;
van der Valk, O. ;
Cervi, W. Rossi ;
Selnes, T. ;
Neumann, T. ;
Steinmann, J. ;
Arora, G. ;
Roebeling, P. .
MARINE POLICY, 2023, 150
[65]   Application of a risk-based approach to continuous underwater noise at local and subregional scales for the Marine Strategy Framework Directive [J].
Verling, Emma ;
Miralles Ricos, Ramon ;
Bou-Cabo, Manuel ;
Lara, Guillermo ;
Garagouni, Maria ;
Brignon, Jean-Marc ;
O'Higgins, Tim .
MARINE POLICY, 2021, 134
[66]   Ship noise and cortisol secretion in European freshwater fishes [J].
Wysocki, LE ;
Dittami, JP ;
Ladich, F .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2006, 128 (04) :501-508
[67]   Engagement of stakeholders in the marine/maritime spatial planning process [J].
Zaucha, Jacek ;
Kreiner, Anja .
MARINE POLICY, 2021, 132