Characterization of multiple organ failure after ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

被引:0
|
作者
Hafeez, Muhammad Saad [1 ]
Li, Shimena R. [2 ]
Reitz, Katherine M. [1 ,2 ]
Phillips, Amanda R. [1 ,2 ]
Habib, Salim G. [1 ]
Jano, Antalya [3 ]
Dai, Yancheng [3 ]
Stone, Andre [3 ]
Tzeng, Edith [1 ,2 ]
Makaroun, Michel S. [1 ,2 ]
Liang, Nathan L. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, Div Vasc Surg, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
Aortic aneurysm rupture; Abdominal aortic aneurysm; Multiple organ failure; Outcomes; EPIDEMIOLOGY; OUTCOMES; TRAUMA; MORTALITY; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jvs.2023.06.011
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Multiple organ failure (MOF) is associated with poor outcomes and increased mortality in sepsis and trauma. There are limited data regarding MOF in patients after ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) repair. We aimed to identify the contemporary prevalence and characteristics of patients with rAAA with MOF. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients with rAAA who underwent repair (2010-2020) at our multihospital institution. Patients who died within the first 2 days after repair were excluded. MOF was quantified by modified (excluding hepatic system) Denver, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, and Multiple Organ Dysfunction Score (MODS) for postoperative days 3 to 5 to determine the prevalence of MOF. MOF was defined as a Denver score of >3, dysfunction in two or more organ systems by SOFA score, or a MODS score of >8. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank testing were used to evaluate differences in 30-day mortality between multiple organ failure and patients without MOF. Logistic regression was used to assess predictors of MOF. Results: Of 370 patients with rAAA, 288 survived past two days (mean age, 73 +/- 10.1 years; 76.7% male; 44.1% open repair), and 143 had data for MOF calculation recorded. From postoperative days 3 to 5, 41 (14.24%) had MOF by Denver, 26 (9.03%) by SOFA, and 39 (13.54%) by MODS criteria. Among these scoring systems, pulmonary and neurological systems were impacted most commonly. Among patients with MOF, pulmonary derangement occurred in 65.9% (Denver), 57.7% (SOFA), and 56.4% (MODS). Similarly, neurological derangement occurred in 92.3% (SOFA) and 89.7% (MODS), but renal derangement occurred in 26.8% (Denver), 23.1% (SOFA), and 10.3% (MODS). MOF by all three scoring systems was associated with increased 30-day mortality (Denver: 11.3% vs 41.5% [P < .01]; DOFA: 12.6% vs 46.2% [P < .01]; MODS: 12.5% vs 35.9% [P < .01]), as was MOF by any criteria (10.8% vs 35.7 %; P < .01). Patients with MOF were more likely to have a higher body mass index (55.9 +/- 26.6 vs 49.0 +/- 15.0; P = .011) and to have had a preoperative stroke (17.9% vs 6.0%; P = .016). Patients with MOF were less likely to have undergone endovascular repair (30.4% vs 62.1%; P < .001). Endovascular repair was protective against MOF (any criteria) on multivariate analysis (odds ratio, 0.23; 95% confidence interval, 0.08-0.64; P = .019) after adjusting for age, gender, and presenting systolic blood pressure. Conclusions: MOF occurred in only 9% to 14% of patients after rAAA repair, but was associated with a three-fold increase in mortality. Endovascular repair was associated with a reduced MOF incidence.
引用
收藏
页码:945 / +
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Characterization of immediate and early mortality after repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm
    Reitz, Katherine M.
    Phillips, Amanda R.
    Tzeng, Edith
    Makaroun, Michel S.
    Leeper, Christine M.
    Liang, Nathan L.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2022, 76 (06) : 1578 - +
  • [2] Hospital Volume of Elective Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair as a Predictor of Mortality After Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair
    Capo, Xavier Faner
    Reyes, Marvin E. Garcia
    Canovas, Alvaro Salinas
    Besalduch, Lluis Sanchez
    Ruiz, David Flota
    Montoya, Sergi Bellmunt
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2024, 68 (01) : 30 - 38
  • [3] Successful Endovascular Aneurysm Repair for a Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
    Kim, Jang Yong
    Park, Keun Myoung
    Jeon, Yong Sun
    Cho, Soon Gu
    Hong, Kee-Chun
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN SURGICAL SOCIETY, 2009, 77 (06): : 429 - 433
  • [4] A Comparison of Endovascular Aneurysm Repair and Open Repair for Ruptured Aortic Abdominal Aneurysms
    Alnefaie, Samaher A.
    Alzahrani, Yasser A.
    Alzahrani, Bashair S.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (06)
  • [5] Improved results in the management of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm may not be on the basis of endovascular aneurysm repair alone
    Mukherjee, Dipankar
    Kfoury, Elias
    Schmidt, Keilla
    Waked, Tarek
    Hashemi, Homayoun
    VASCULAR, 2014, 22 (01) : 51 - 54
  • [6] Treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: open surgical repair versus endovascular repair
    Ucles Cabeza, Oscar
    Martinez Lopez, Isaac
    Pla Sanchez, Ferran
    Baturone Blanco, Adriana
    Serrano Hernando, Francisco Javier
    ANGIOLOGIA, 2021, 73 (04): : 173 - 181
  • [7] Local anaesthesia for endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm
    Mouton, R.
    Rogers, C. A.
    Harris, R. A.
    Hinchliffe, R. J.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 106 (01) : 74 - +
  • [8] A new metric for centralization of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in large territories
    Nault, Patrice
    Brisson-Tessier, Camille
    Hamel, Denis
    Lambert, Laurie J.
    Blais, Claudia
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2015, 62 (04) : 862 - 867
  • [9] Ruptured Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: Part II
    Ricotta, Joseph J., II
    Malgor, Rafael D.
    Oderich, Gustavo S.
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2010, 24 (02) : 269 - 277
  • [10] Endovascular versus open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm
    McHugh, S. M.
    Aherne, T.
    Goetz, T.
    Byrne, J.
    Boyle, E.
    Allen, M.
    Leahy, A.
    Moneley, D.
    Naughton, P.
    SURGEON-JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL COLLEGES OF SURGEONS OF EDINBURGH AND IRELAND, 2016, 14 (05): : 274 - 277