Validity and reliability of the WHOQOL-BREF in a pregnant population

被引:2
|
作者
Rondung, Elisabet [1 ]
Oliveira, Sandra [2 ]
Esteves, Francisco [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Mid Sweden Univ, Dept Psychol & Social Work, S-83125 Ostersund, Sweden
[2] Univ Catolica Portuguesa, Fac Ciencias Humanas, Catolica Res Ctr Psychol Family & Social Wellbeing, Lisbon, Portugal
关键词
Quality of life; WHOQOL-BREF; Pregnancy; Women; Validity; Confirmatory factor analysis; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; WORLD-HEALTH-ORGANIZATION; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1186/s12955-023-02166-2
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundPhysical end emotional changes during pregnancy may not only affect pregnant womens' quality of life, but also how instruments assessing quality of life perform in such populations. To date, there is insufficient evidence on psychometric properties for both generic and condition-specific instruments measuring quality of life during pregnancy. The aim of this study was thus to examine the structural validity, internal consistency, and construct validity of the WHOQOL-BREF in a sample of pregnant women.MethodsA convenience sample of 1015 pregnant women in Sweden completed the WHOQOL-BREF online. We examined the psychometric properties of the instrument using principal component analysis (PCA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), Cronbach's alpha, item-domain correlations, correlations with overall QOL and general health, and multiple linear regression with items on overall QOL and general health as outcomes.ResultsPrincipal Component Analysis in a random subsample (n = 502) supported a four-factor model, encompassing the domains physical, psychological, social and environmental quality of life, but with four of the items originally in the environmental domain relocated to the other domains. The proposed domain structure showed good fit in confirmatory factor analysis in the other random subsample (n = 513). The physical and psychological domains showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.885 and 0.826 respectively), while the social and environmental domains were weaker in this regard. All domains showed significant positive correlations with items on overall QOL and general health. The physical and psychological domains were the most evident predictors in the regression models.ConclusionsWe find the Swedish version of the WHOQOL-BREF to have good psychometric properties to be used in samples of pregnant women, and propose an alternative domain structure that might be even more useful for assessing quality of life during pregnancy. The physical and psychological domains showed good internal consistency and construct validity.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Validity and reliability of the WHOQOL-BREF in a pregnant population
    Elisabet Rondung
    Sandra Oliveira
    Francisco Esteves
    Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 21
  • [2] Validity and reliability of the Bangla version of WHOQOL-BREF on an adolescent population in Bangladesh
    Takashi Izutsu
    Atsuro Tsutsumi
    Md. Akramul Islam
    Yusuke Matsuo
    Helena Sayuri Yamada
    Hiroshi Kurita
    Susumu Wakai
    Quality of Life Research, 2005, 14 : 1783 - 1789
  • [3] Validity and reliability of the Bangla version of WHOQOL-BREF on an adolescent population in Bangladesh
    Izutsu, T
    Tsutsumi, A
    Islam, M
    Matsuo, Y
    Yamada, H
    Kurita, H
    Wakai, S
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2005, 14 (07) : 1783 - 1789
  • [4] Reliability and validity of the Bangla version of WHOQOL-BREF in an adult population in Dhaka, Bangladesh
    Tsutsumi, Atsuro
    Izutsu, Takashi
    Kato, Seika
    Islam, Akramul
    Yamada, Helena Sayuri
    Kato, Hiroshi
    Wakai, Susumu
    PSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCES, 2006, 60 (04) : 493 - 498
  • [5] Content validity, construct validity, and reliability of the WHOQOL-Bref in a population of Dutch adult psychiatric outpatients
    Fons J. Trompenaars
    Erik D. Masthoff
    Guus L. Van Heck
    Paul P. Hodiamont
    Jolanda De Vries
    Quality of Life Research, 2005, 14 : 151 - 160
  • [6] Development and verification of validity and reliability of the WHOQOL-BREF Taiwan version
    Yao, G
    Chung, CW
    Yu, CF
    Wang, JD
    JOURNAL OF THE FORMOSAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 101 (05) : 342 - 351
  • [7] Content validity, construct validity, and reliability of the WHOQOL-Bref in a population of Dutch adult psychiatric outpatients
    Trompenaars, F
    Masthoff, E
    Heck, G
    Hodiamont, P
    Vries, J
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2005, 14 (01) : 151 - 160
  • [8] Development, reliability and validity of the Chichewa WHOQOL-BREF in adults in lilongwe, Malawi
    Tim Colbourn
    Gibson Masache
    Jolene Skordis-Worrall
    BMC Research Notes, 5 (1)
  • [9] Reliability, validity and acceptability of the WHOQOL-Bref in a sample of Italian psychiatric outpatients
    Carpiniello, Bernardo
    Pinna, Martina
    Carta, Mauro G.
    Orru, M. Germana
    EPIDEMIOLOGIA E PSICHIATRIA SOCIALE-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR EPIDEMIOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRIC SCIENCES, 2006, 15 (03): : 228 - 232
  • [10] Dimensional validity of WHOQOL-BREF in health workers
    Lobo Dinis Castro, Marcelle Maria
    Marques Hoekerberg, Yara Hahr
    Lambert Passos, Sonia Regina
    CADERNOS DE SAUDE PUBLICA, 2013, 29 (07): : 1357 - 1369