Development and validation of a deep learning model for predicting postoperative survival of patients with gastric cancer

被引:5
作者
Wu, Mengjie [1 ]
Yang, Xiaofan [1 ]
Liu, Yuxi [2 ]
Han, Feng [2 ]
Li, Xi [2 ]
Wang, Jufeng [1 ]
Guo, Dandan [3 ]
Tang, Xiance [2 ]
Lin, Lu [4 ]
Liu, Changpeng [2 ]
机构
[1] Zhengzhou Univ, Affiliated Canc Hosp, Henan Canc Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, Zhengzhou 450008, Peoples R China
[2] Zhengzhou Univ, Affiliated Canc Hosp, Henan Canc Hosp, Dept Med Records,Off DRGs Diag Related Grp, 127 Dongming Rd,POB 0061, Zhengzhou 450008, Henan, Peoples R China
[3] Zhengzhou Univ, Affiliated Hosp 3, Dept Radiol, Zhengzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Henan Univ Chinese Med, Peoples Hosp, Zhengzhou Peoples Hosp, Translat Med Res Ctr, Zhengzhou 450003, Henan, Peoples R China
关键词
Machine learning; Deep learning; Gastric cancer; Predictive model; Survival rate; MACHINE; PROGNOSIS; EPIDEMIOLOGY; SURVEILLANCE;
D O I
10.1186/s12889-024-18221-6
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
BackgroundDeep learning (DL), a specialized form of machine learning (ML), is valuable for forecasting survival in various diseases. Its clinical applicability in real-world patients with gastric cancer (GC) has yet to be extensively validated.MethodsA combined cohort of 11,414 GC patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database and 2,846 patients from a Chinese dataset were utilized. The internal validation of different algorithms, including DL model, traditional ML models, and American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage model, was conducted by training and testing sets on the SEER database, followed by external validation on the Chinese dataset. The performance of the algorithms was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, decision curve, and calibration curve.ResultsDL model demonstrated superior performance in terms of the area under the curve (AUC) at 1, 3, and, 5 years post-surgery across both datasets, surpassing other ML models and AJCC stage model, with AUCs of 0.77, 0.80, and 0.82 in the SEER dataset and 0.77, 0.76, and 0.75 in the Chinese dataset, respectively. Furthermore, decision curve analysis revealed that the DL model yielded greater net gains at 3 years than other ML models and AJCC stage model, and calibration plots at 3 years indicated a favorable level of consistency between the ML and actual observations during external validation.ConclusionsDL-based model was established to accurately predict the survival rate of postoperative patients with GC.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Manta Ray Foraging Optimization Transfer Learning-Based Gastric Cancer Diagnosis and Classification on Endoscopic Images
    Alrowais, Fadwa
    Alotaibi, Saud S.
    Marzouk, Radwa
    Salama, Ahmed S.
    Rizwanullah, Mohammed
    Zamani, Abu Sarwar
    Abdelmageed, Amgad Atta
    Eldesouki, Mohamed, I
    [J]. CANCERS, 2022, 14 (22)
  • [2] Machine and deep learning methods for radiomics
    Avanzo, Michele
    Wei, Lise
    Stancanello, Joseph
    Vallieres, Martin
    Rao, Arvind
    Morin, Olivier
    Mattonen, Sarah A.
    El Naqa, Issam
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (05) : E185 - E202
  • [3] Bang YJ, 2010, LANCET, V376, P1302
  • [4] Automated tumour budding quantification by machine learning augments TNM staging in muscle-invasive bladder cancer prognosis
    Brieu, Nicolas
    Gavriel, Christos G.
    Nearchou, Ines P.
    Harrison, David J.
    Schmidt, Guenter
    Caie, Peter D.
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9 (1)
  • [5] Molecular analysis of gastric cancer identifies subtypes associated with distinct clinical outcomes
    Cristescu, Razvan
    Lee, Jeeyun
    Nebozhyn, Michael
    Kim, Kyoung-Mee
    Ting, Jason C.
    Wong, Swee Seong
    Liu, Jiangang
    Yue, Yong Gang
    Wang, Jian
    Yu, Kun
    Ye, Xiang S.
    Do, In-Gu
    Liu, Shawn
    Gong, Lara
    Fu, Jake
    Jin, Jason Gang
    Choi, Min Gew
    Sohn, Tae Sung
    Lee, Joon Ho
    Bae, Jae Moon
    Kim, Seung Tae
    Park, Se Hoon
    Sohn, Insuk
    Jung, Sin-Ho
    Tan, Patrick
    Chen, Ronghua
    Hardwick, James
    Kang, Won Ki
    Ayers, Mark
    Dai Hongyue
    Reinhard, Christoph
    Loboda, Andrey
    Kim, Sung
    Aggarwal, Amit
    [J]. NATURE MEDICINE, 2015, 21 (05) : 449 - U217
  • [6] How to evaluate deep learning for cancer diagnostics - factors and recommendations
    Daneshjou, Roxana
    He, Bryan
    Ouyang, David
    Zou, James Y.
    [J]. BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-REVIEWS ON CANCER, 2021, 1875 (02):
  • [7] Clinical significance of lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer
    Deng, Jing-Yu
    Liang, Han
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 20 (14) : 3967 - 3975
  • [8] The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program and Pathology Toward Strengthening the Critical Relationship
    Duggan, Maire A.
    Anderson, William F.
    Altekruse, Sean
    Penberthy, Lynne
    Sherman, Mark E.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2016, 40 (12) : E94 - E102
  • [9] Gastric cancer prevention strategies: A global perspective
    Eusebi, Leonardo Henry
    Telese, Andrea
    Marasco, Giovanni
    Bazzoli, Franco
    Zagari, Rocco Maurizio
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2020, 35 (09) : 1495 - 1502
  • [10] A guide to machine learning for biologists
    Greener, Joe G.
    Kandathil, Shaun M.
    Moffat, Lewis
    Jones, David T.
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS MOLECULAR CELL BIOLOGY, 2022, 23 (01) : 40 - 55