Decentralized energy in flexible energy system: Life cycle environmental impacts in Belgium

被引:6
作者
Huber, Dominik [1 ]
Costa, Daniele [1 ]
Felice, Alex [1 ]
Valkering, Pieter [2 ]
Coosemans, Thierry [1 ]
Messagie, Maarten [1 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Brussel, Mobil Logist & Automot Technol Res Ctr MOBI, Dept Elect Engn & Energy Technol, Elect Vehicle & Energy Res Grp EVERGI, Pl Laan 2, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
[2] VITO EnergyVille, Unit Smart Energy & Built Environm SEB, Thor Pk 8310, B-3600 Genk, Belgium
关键词
Life cycle assessment; Decentralized energy systems; Energy model; Photovoltaic installations; lithium -ion battery; Second -life battery; RENEWABLE ENERGY; BATTERIES; OPTIMIZATION; PERFORMANCE; FOOTPRINT;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163882
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Decentralized energy systems enable a higher integration of electricity generation by renewable energy sources sup-ported by electric storage and may significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions for electricity generation. While the environmental impact of single technologies has received great attention in recent years, the environmental im-pacts of decentralized energy generation and storage technologies remain unaddressed. This study presents a cradle -to-grave life cycle assessment of those technologies in Belgium for 2030 and 2050. The system technologies comprise single-Si photovoltaic installations combined with lithium-ion and second-life batteries. To compile the life cycle in-ventory (LCI), energy balances are built based on a Belgian impact energy model. The flexibility of the energy system is introduced by different EV charging strategies and distinct modes of stationary battery storage with the Belgium electricity grid, represented by four different scenarios: i) low flexibility, ii) medium flexibility, iii) high flexibility, and iv) high flexibility with high prosumer potential (PPH). The midpoint impact categories climate change, land use, mineral resource scarcity and terrestrial ecotoxicity of ReCiPe life cycle impact assessment method are analyzed. The decentralized energy generation and storage technologies in Belgium in 2050 result in 64.51 gCO2eq/kWh of con-sumed electricity for the medium flexibility scenario, representing a 72 % decrease compared to 2014. However, these reductions are driven by changes in the national electricity mix. Land use impacts are also reduced, up to 72 % for the high flexibility PPH scenario. In contrast, mineral resource scarcity and terrestrial ecotoxicity rise over time in the high flexibility PPH scenario in 2050 to 46 % and 66 %, respectively. A perturbation analysis is conducted to assess the sen-sitivity of the results, showing solar irradiation as the most sensitive parameter. One way to further reduce the environmental impacts of decentralized energy systems could be to investigate new strategies for the end-of-life of photovoltaic installations and batteries.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 65 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2020, Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2019
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2018, Policy on Emergency Medicine Residency Training Requirements, P1
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2006, Environmental Management: Life Cycle Assessment Requirements and Guidelines, DOI DOI 10.1136/BMJ.332.7555.1418,1418.1
  • [4] Designing local renewable energy communities to increase social acceptance: Evidence from a choice experiment in Austria, Germany, Italy, and Switzerland
    Azarova, Valeriya
    Cohen, Jed
    Friedl, Christina
    Reichl, Johannes
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2019, 132 : 1176 - 1183
  • [5] Life Cycle Assessment of Solar Photovoltaic Microgrid Systems in Off-Grid Communities
    Bilich, Andrew
    Langham, Kevin
    Geyer, Roland
    Goyal, Love
    Hansen, James
    Krishnan, Anjana
    Bergesen, Joseph
    Sinha, Parikhit
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 51 (02) : 1043 - 1052
  • [6] Blengini GianAndrea., 2020, Critical Raw Materials for Strategic Technologies and Sectors in the EU - a Foresight Study
  • [7] How will second-use of batteries affect stocks and flows in the EU? A model for traction Li-ion batteries
    Bobba, Silvia
    Mathieux, Fabrice
    Blengini, Gian Andrea
    [J]. RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2019, 145 : 279 - 291
  • [8] Life Cycle Assessment of repurposed electric vehicle batteries: an adapted method based on modelling energy flows
    Bobba, Silvia
    Mathieux, Fabrice
    Ardente, Fulvio
    Blengini, Gian Andrea
    Cusenza, Maria Anna
    Podias, Andreas
    Pfrang, Andreas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE, 2018, 19 : 213 - 225
  • [9] Bureau federal du Plan, 2017, PAYS EN BELG HOR 205
  • [10] Trends in tools and approaches for modelling the energy transition
    Chang, Miguel
    Thellufsen, Jakob Zink
    Zakeri, Behnam
    Pickering, Bryn
    Pfenninger, Stefan
    Lund, Henrik
    Ostergaard, Poul Alberg
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2021, 290