A machine learning approach for efficient and robust resistance spot welding monitoring

被引:12
作者
Bogaerts, Lars [1 ]
Dejans, Arnout [1 ]
Faes, Matthias G. R. [2 ]
Moens, David [1 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Mech Engn, LMSD Div, Jan Nayerlaan 5, B-2860 St Katelijne Waver, Belgium
[2] TU Dortmund Univ, Chair Reliabil Engn, Leonhard Euler Str 5, D-44227 Dortmund, Germany
关键词
Resistance spot welding; Nugget diameter; Deep learning; Machine learning; DYNAMIC RESISTANCE; QUALITY ASSESSMENT; NUGGET DIAMETER; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1007/s40194-023-01519-1
中图分类号
TF [冶金工业];
学科分类号
0806 ;
摘要
The estimation of the weld nugget diameter generated by the resistance spot welding process is a crucial element in the assessment of the overall quality of the weld and plays a major role in in-line process control. The process is crucial to produce end-products in many industries such as aviation, aerospace, automotive and other industrial areas. A modern car body contains typically several thousands of welds produced by resistance spot welding, setting an ideal scene for in-line process control. Current state-of-the-art monitoring methods are based on several features extracted from the dynamic resistance signal. However, the accuracy of those is generally not high. In this work, a method for predicting the nugget diameter based on the combination of unsupervised deep learning and Gaussian process regression is developed. Autoencoders are adopted to extract features from the dynamic resistance curve in a low-dimensional representation. These features embody underlying information on the process, possibly unobservable or not detectable by any other currently existing approach. Next, a Gaussian process regression model is trained to link those features to the target weld nugget diameter. Compared with the currently popular geometrical attributes approach, the results show that the model has a higher prediction accuracy in nugget diameter prediction, while remaining a low cost implementation in an industrial setting. These results are supported by several cases, derived directly from common industrial bottlenecks. Both cases indicate a strong potential with the new AE-GPR approach, with consistently improved results compared to the currently popular geometrical attributes approach.
引用
收藏
页码:1923 / 1935
页数:13
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   A multivariate GR&R approach to variability evaluation of measuring instruments in resistance spot welding process [J].
Almeida, F. A. ;
De Paula, T. I. ;
Leite, R. R. ;
Gomes, G. F. ;
Gomes, J. H. F. ;
Paiva, A. P. ;
Balestrassi, P. P. .
JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING PROCESSES, 2018, 36 :465-479
[2]  
Bogaerts L, 2019, 2019 IEEE SYMPOSIUM SERIES ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE (IEEE SSCI 2019), P768, DOI 10.1109/SSCI44817.2019.9002995
[3]  
Brunton SL, 2019, DATA-DRIVEN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING: MACHINE LEARNING, DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS, AND CONTROL, P1, DOI 10.1017/9781108380690
[4]   Online monitoring and evaluation of the weld quality of resistance spot welded titanium alloy [J].
Chen, S. ;
Sun, T. ;
Jiang, A. ;
Qi, J. ;
Zeng, R. .
JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING PROCESSES, 2016, 23 :183-191
[5]  
Cho Y, 2002, WELD J, V81, p104S
[6]   Quality estimation of resistance spot welding by using pattern recognition with neural networks [J].
Cho, YJ ;
Rhee, S .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT, 2004, 53 (02) :330-334
[7]   Acoustic emission as a tool for prediction of nugget diameter in resistance spot welding [J].
Dejans, Arnout ;
Kurtov, Oleksandr ;
Van Rymenant, Patrick .
JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING PROCESSES, 2021, 62 :7-17
[8]  
Dickinson D. W., 1980, Welding Journal, V59, P170
[9]   Dynamic resistance based model for on-line resistance spot welding quality assessment [J].
El Ouafi, A. ;
Belanger, R. ;
Guillot, M. .
THERMEC 2011, PTS 1-4, 2012, 706-709 :2925-+
[10]  
Ghaffari B, 2010, FAILURE MECHANISMS OF ADVANCED WELDING PROCESSES, P101, DOI 10.1533/9781845699765.101