Sustainability assessment of alternative energy power generation pathways through the development of impact indicators for water, land, GHG emissions, and cost

被引:9
作者
Ali, Babkir [1 ]
Hedayati-Dezfooli, M. [1 ]
Gamil, Ahmed [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Doha Sci & Technol, Jelaiah St,POB 24449, Doha, Qatar
[2] Univ Arizona, Dept Aerosp & Mech Engn, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
关键词
Renewable energy; Sustainability; Electricity generation; GHG emissions; Land use; Water demand; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSION; FAST PYROLYSIS; ELECTRICITY-GENERATION; SYSTEMS; CONSUMPTION; INTEGRATION; RESIDUES; MODULES;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2022.113030
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Sustainability indicators are helpful factors to comparatively assess power generation pathways. This paper develops sustainability indicators for sixty alternative energy pathways. The selected indicators reflect the quantitative impacts of power generation on water, air, land, and levelized cost of electricity (LCOE). Indicators are harmonized at a specific conversion efficiency, developed per a functional power generation unit (MWh), and covering the cradle-to-gate boundary. The power generation stage of hydroelectricity has the most negative impact on the water consumption indicator of 68.18 m3/MWh, the highest land use indicator of 7.76 m2/MWh, and is simultaneously associated with the lowest GHG emissions indicator of 1.9 kg of CO2 eq./MWh. Sustainable scenarios are conducted in this study to identify the optimum pathways that have the lowest impacts on natural resources, GHG emissions, and the LCOE. The sustainable scenarios are executed under the annual power generation range 1-44 TWh to quantify the minimum required constraints of water, land, GHG emissions, and the LCOE. Power generation from geothermal flash technology with cooling tower and bio-oil with dry cooling showed the most sustainable pathways based on the boundaries of the cradle-to-gate and power generation stage, respectively. Centrifugal enrichment technology with dry cooling is the most sustainable among nuclear energy pathways, while flat-panel photovoltaic has shown the best sustainability among solar energy pathways.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 61 条
[31]   Thermal energy storage system integration forms for a sustainable future [J].
Li, Gang ;
Zheng, Xuefei .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 62 :736-757
[32]   Development of a general sustainability indicator for renewable energy systems: A review [J].
Liu, Gang .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2014, 31 :611-621
[33]   An assessment of the torrefaction of North American pine and life cycle greenhouse gas emissions [J].
McNamee, P. ;
Adams, P. W. R. ;
McManus, M. C. ;
Dooley, B. ;
Darvell, L. I. ;
Williams, A. ;
Jones, J. M. .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 113 :177-188
[34]   Forest biomass supply chains in Ireland: A life cycle assessment of GHG emissions and primary energy balances [J].
Murphy, Fionnuala ;
Devlin, Ger ;
McDonnell, Kevin .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2014, 116 :1-8
[35]   Sustainable energy transition readiness: A multicriteria assessment index [J].
Neofytou, H. ;
Nikas, A. ;
Doukas, H. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2020, 131
[36]   Life cycle greenhouse gas emission of wooden guardrails: a study in Nagano Prefecture [J].
Noda, Ryu ;
Kayo, Chihiro ;
Yamanouchi, Masato ;
Shibata, Naoaki .
JOURNAL OF WOOD SCIENCE, 2016, 62 (02) :181-193
[37]   Review on life cycle assessment of energy payback and greenhouse gas emission of solar photovoltaic systems [J].
Peng, Jinqing ;
Lu, Lin ;
Yang, Hongxing .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2013, 19 :255-274
[38]   The effect of bioenergy expansion: Food, energy, and environment [J].
Popp, J. ;
Lakner, Z. ;
Harangi-Rakos, M. ;
Fari, M. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2014, 32 :559-578
[39]   Life Cycle Environmental and Economic Tradeoffs of Using Fast Pyrolysis Products for Power Generation [J].
Pourhashem, Ghasideh ;
Spatari, Sabrina ;
Boateng, Akwasi A. ;
McAloon, Andrew J. ;
Mullen, Charles A. .
ENERGY & FUELS, 2013, 27 (05) :2578-2587
[40]   Life cycle assessment and energy pay-back time of advanced photovoltaic modules: CdTe and CIS compared to poly-Si [J].
Raugei, Marco ;
Bargigli, Silvia ;
Ulgiati, Sergio .
ENERGY, 2007, 32 (08) :1310-1318