A tale of four studios: Evolving planning and architecture education towards mixed modality in a post-pandemic world

被引:3
作者
Hewidy, Hossam [1 ]
Purkarthofer, Eva [2 ]
Eraeranta, Susa [2 ]
机构
[1] Aalto Univ, Sch Arts Design & Architecture, Dept Architecture, Espoo, Finland
[2] Aalto Univ, Sch Engn, Dept Built Environm, Espoo, Finland
关键词
Studio; Planning education; Architecture education; COVID-19; pandemic; Digitalization; DISTANCE;
D O I
10.1007/s10639-023-12320-4
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The COVID-19 pandemic imposed urgent challenges for educational institutions. The sudden shift from on-site teaching to online distance learning offered the possibility to examine new settings of the studio, a core element of planning and architecture education. Although the pandemic is now over, online learning has secured a fixed place in university education, and consequently, educational institutions need to reconsider studio education based on the lessons learned during the pandemic. Through studying four studios taught at Aalto University, Finland, in 2020 and 2021, this article examines student-teacher experiences, and proposes opportunities for evolving studio education. The findings show that distance learning has in general sustained the objectives of studio education. However, challenges remain especially regarding the social aspects of learning. The degree of success of online teaching varied greatly depending on the tasks and the orientation of the studio (design or strategy). Technological aids and devices also had an influence on fulfilling the pedagogical objectives of learning. Professional socialization was highly affected by the online environment both in design and planning studios and the architectural representation witnessed difficulties specifically in design studios. To evolve the studio setting, the article suggests a mixed modality model supporting the social dimension of studio teaching by combining on-site and online learning activities to enrich the learning process. Such a model can harmonize the intended learning objectives and activities with the teaching methods and modality, thus improving the social dimension of studio teaching.
引用
收藏
页码:11847 / 11868
页数:22
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] Aitken-Rose E., 2009, J ED BUILT ENV, V4, P8, DOI [10.11120/jebe.2009.04010008, DOI 10.11120/JEBE.2009.04010008]
  • [2] Intelligent analysis of the quality of education through teaching practices on virtual campuses
    Alvarez-Blanco, Lucia
    Castro-Lopez, Adrian
    Cervero, Antonio
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY OF EDUCATION, 2023, 38 (03) : 1111 - 1128
  • [3] Bailenson J. N., 2021, Technology, Mind, and Behavior, V2, P1, DOI DOI 10.1037/TMB0000030
  • [5] Bell S., 2010, CLEARING HOUSE J ED, V83, P39, DOI [DOI 10.1080/00098650903505415, 10.1080/00098650903505415]
  • [6] Introduction: Time to Think
    Bertolini, Luca
    [J]. PLANNING THEORY & PRACTICE, 2012, 13 (03) : 465 - 467
  • [7] Biggs J. B., 2003, TEACHING QUALITY LEA
  • [8] Managing the Complexity of Design Problems through Studiobased Learning
    Cennamo, Katherine
    Brandt, Carol
    Scott, Brigitte
    Douglas, Sarah
    McGrath, Margarita
    Reimer, Yolanda
    Vernon, Mitzi
    [J]. INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING, 2011, 5 (02): : 12 - 36
  • [9] Cifuentes L, 2010, TECHTRENDS, V54, P44
  • [10] Hidden Dimensions of Creativity Elements in Design Process
    Demirkan, Halime
    Hasirci, Deniz
    [J]. CREATIVITY RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2009, 21 (2-3) : 294 - 301