The Outcome of Sacrocolpopexy/Sacrohysteropexy for Patients with Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Predictors of Anatomical Failure

被引:2
|
作者
Alsahabi, Jawaher A. [1 ,2 ]
Alsary, Saeed [1 ,2 ]
Abolfotouh, Mostafa A. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] King Saud Ben Abdu Aziz Univ Hlth Sci KSAU HS, Dept Urogynecol & Reconstruct Female Pelv Surg, King Abdul Aziz Med City, Minist Natl Guard Hlth Affairs, Riyadh 22490, Saudi Arabia
[2] King Saud Ben Abdul Aziz Univ Hlth Sci KSAU HS, King Abdullah Int Med Res Ctr KAIMRC, Minist Natl Guard Hlth Affairs, Riyadh 11481, Saudi Arabia
[3] King Saud bin Abdulaziz Univ Hlth Sci, King Abdullah Int Med Res Ctr, Riyadh Minist Natl Guard Hlth Affairs, POB 22490, Riyadh 11426, Saudi Arabia
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH | 2023年 / 15卷
关键词
pelvic organ prolapse; Sacrocolpopexy; Sacrohysteropexy; laparoscopy; mesh complications; prolapse recurrence; surgical; failure; success rate; RISK-FACTORS; LAPAROSCOPIC SACROCOLPOPEXY; RECURRENCE;
D O I
10.2147/IJWH.S413729
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a medical condition that profoundly impacts women's quality of life. Unfortunately, the literature lacks long-term predictors and risk factors for its recurrence. This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of Sacrocolpopexy/Sacrohysteropexy and to identify the predictors of recurrence in a Saudi setting.Methods: In a retrospective cohort study, all patients who underwent Sacrocolpopexy (n=144) and Sacrohysteropexy (n=56) between 2009-2021 were followed up. Electronic medical records were examined to collect data on the following: Patient characteristics [age, parity, BMI, and past medical and surgical history], prolapse-related characteristics/symptoms, Surgery-related characteristics [type and approach of surgery, mesh type, and concomitant surgery], and Outcome characteristics. Postoperative anatomical success and failure rates were determined according to the Baden-Walker classification. Logistic regression analysis was applied to identify the predictors of overall anatomical failure of Sacrocolpopexy. Significance was considered at p<0.05.Results: Success rates of 96.8%, 99.4%, and 85.2% were detected in the anterior, apical, and posterior vaginal prolapse, respectively, with an overall success rate of 83.1%. The overall failure rate was 15.9%, with an incidence density of 5.98 per 100 women-years. The onset of failure in 27 failure cases ranged from 40 days to 11.5 years postoperative. After adjustment for the possible potential confounders, older age (OR=1.06, 95% CI:1.01-1.13, p=0.03) and the presence of diabetes (OR=4.93, 95% CI:1.33-18.33, p=0.02) were the only significant predictors of operation failure. As for complications, six cases (3.6%) required reoperation, two cases (1.2%) had a bowel obstruction two and seven years after surgery, and one patient (0.6%) had vaginal mesh exposure.Conclusion: The outcomes of Sacrocolpopexy/Sacrohysteropexy in our study are comparable to those in previous studies. Diabetes and elder age at the time of the surgery played a role in predicting recurrence. Sacrocolpopexy has a long-term profile of safety and efficacy. These findings could be key to stratifying surgical plans for pelvic organ prolapse cases.
引用
收藏
页码:1093 / 1105
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy plus ventral rectopexy as combined treatment for multicompartment pelvic organ prolapse
    G. Campagna
    G. Panico
    D. Caramazza
    L. P. Anchora
    A. Parello
    V. Gallucci
    L. Vacca
    G. Scambia
    A. Ercoli
    C. Ratto
    Techniques in Coloproctology, 2020, 24 : 573 - 584
  • [32] Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy plus ventral rectopexy as combined treatment for multicompartment pelvic organ prolapse
    Campagna, G.
    Panico, G.
    Caramazza, D.
    Anchora, L. P.
    Parello, A.
    Gallucci, V
    Vacca, L.
    Scambia, G.
    Ercoli, A.
    Ratto, C.
    TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2020, 24 (06) : 573 - 584
  • [33] Outcomes of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy using self-cut mesh on pelvic organ prolapse
    Meutia, Alfa Putri
    Djusad, Suskhan
    Priyatini, Tyas
    Yonathan, Kevin
    Hayashi, Tokumasa
    Nomura, Jimmy
    UROLOGY ANNALS, 2024, 16 (04) : 284 - 287
  • [34] Laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review
    Callewaert, Geertje
    Bosteels, Jan
    Housmans, Susanne
    Verguts, Jasper
    Van Cleynenbreugel, Ben
    Van der Aa, Frank
    De Ridder, Dirk
    Vergote, Ignace
    Deprest, Jan
    GYNECOLOGICAL SURGERY, 2016, 13 (02) : 115 - 123
  • [35] A Review of the Current Status of Laparoscopic and Robot-assisted Sacrocolpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
    Lee, Richard K.
    Mottrie, Alexandre
    Payne, Christopher K.
    Waltregny, David
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2014, 65 (06) : 1128 - 1137
  • [36] Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for exteriorized pelvic organ prolapse: Mid-term functional results
    Andre, B.
    Jourdain, O.
    Guerby, P.
    Vidal, F.
    Leonard, F.
    GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE FERTILITE & SENOLOGIE, 2018, 46 (01): : 7 - 13
  • [37] Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Pectopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Compared with Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy
    Yang, Yingying
    Li, Zhen
    Si, Keyi
    Dai, Qingqiang
    Qiao, Yingying
    Li, Dazhuang
    Zhang, Li
    Wu, Fan
    He, Jia
    Wu, Guizhu
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 30 (10) : 833 - 840.e2
  • [38] Robotic Sacrocolpopexy—Is It the Treatment of Choice for Advanced Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse?
    Janine L. Oliver
    Ja-Hong Kim
    Current Urology Reports, 2017, 18
  • [39] Robotic sacrocolpopexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse: quality of life outcomes
    Vollstedt, Annah
    Meeks, William
    Triaca, Veronica
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN UROLOGY, 2019, 11 : 1 - 9
  • [40] Uterus-sparing vaginolaparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for apical pelvic organ prolapse
    Atef Darwish
    Mostafa Bahlol
    AbdelGhafar Ahmad
    Mohamed Fekry
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2018, 29 : 1455 - 1461