The Outcome of Sacrocolpopexy/Sacrohysteropexy for Patients with Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Predictors of Anatomical Failure

被引:2
|
作者
Alsahabi, Jawaher A. [1 ,2 ]
Alsary, Saeed [1 ,2 ]
Abolfotouh, Mostafa A. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] King Saud Ben Abdu Aziz Univ Hlth Sci KSAU HS, Dept Urogynecol & Reconstruct Female Pelv Surg, King Abdul Aziz Med City, Minist Natl Guard Hlth Affairs, Riyadh 22490, Saudi Arabia
[2] King Saud Ben Abdul Aziz Univ Hlth Sci KSAU HS, King Abdullah Int Med Res Ctr KAIMRC, Minist Natl Guard Hlth Affairs, Riyadh 11481, Saudi Arabia
[3] King Saud bin Abdulaziz Univ Hlth Sci, King Abdullah Int Med Res Ctr, Riyadh Minist Natl Guard Hlth Affairs, POB 22490, Riyadh 11426, Saudi Arabia
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH | 2023年 / 15卷
关键词
pelvic organ prolapse; Sacrocolpopexy; Sacrohysteropexy; laparoscopy; mesh complications; prolapse recurrence; surgical; failure; success rate; RISK-FACTORS; LAPAROSCOPIC SACROCOLPOPEXY; RECURRENCE;
D O I
10.2147/IJWH.S413729
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a medical condition that profoundly impacts women's quality of life. Unfortunately, the literature lacks long-term predictors and risk factors for its recurrence. This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of Sacrocolpopexy/Sacrohysteropexy and to identify the predictors of recurrence in a Saudi setting.Methods: In a retrospective cohort study, all patients who underwent Sacrocolpopexy (n=144) and Sacrohysteropexy (n=56) between 2009-2021 were followed up. Electronic medical records were examined to collect data on the following: Patient characteristics [age, parity, BMI, and past medical and surgical history], prolapse-related characteristics/symptoms, Surgery-related characteristics [type and approach of surgery, mesh type, and concomitant surgery], and Outcome characteristics. Postoperative anatomical success and failure rates were determined according to the Baden-Walker classification. Logistic regression analysis was applied to identify the predictors of overall anatomical failure of Sacrocolpopexy. Significance was considered at p<0.05.Results: Success rates of 96.8%, 99.4%, and 85.2% were detected in the anterior, apical, and posterior vaginal prolapse, respectively, with an overall success rate of 83.1%. The overall failure rate was 15.9%, with an incidence density of 5.98 per 100 women-years. The onset of failure in 27 failure cases ranged from 40 days to 11.5 years postoperative. After adjustment for the possible potential confounders, older age (OR=1.06, 95% CI:1.01-1.13, p=0.03) and the presence of diabetes (OR=4.93, 95% CI:1.33-18.33, p=0.02) were the only significant predictors of operation failure. As for complications, six cases (3.6%) required reoperation, two cases (1.2%) had a bowel obstruction two and seven years after surgery, and one patient (0.6%) had vaginal mesh exposure.Conclusion: The outcomes of Sacrocolpopexy/Sacrohysteropexy in our study are comparable to those in previous studies. Diabetes and elder age at the time of the surgery played a role in predicting recurrence. Sacrocolpopexy has a long-term profile of safety and efficacy. These findings could be key to stratifying surgical plans for pelvic organ prolapse cases.
引用
收藏
页码:1093 / 1105
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Combined rectopexy and sacrocolpopexy is safe for correction of pelvic organ prolapse
    Cristina B. Geltzeiler
    Elisa H. Birnbaum
    Matthew L. Silviera
    Matthew G. Mutch
    Joel Vetter
    Paul E. Wise
    Steven R. Hunt
    Sean C. Glasgow
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2018, 33 : 1453 - 1459
  • [22] The impact of diabetes mellitus on pelvic organ prolapse recurrence after robotic sacrocolpopexy
    Eckhardt, Sarah
    Laus, Katharina
    DeAndrade, Samantha
    Lee, Janet
    Nguyen, John
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2023, 34 (08) : 1859 - 1866
  • [23] Robotic or laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus open sacrohysteropexy for uterus preservation in pelvic organ prolapse
    Paek, Jiheum
    Lee, Maria
    Kim, Bo Wook
    Kwon, Yongil
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2016, 27 (04) : 593 - 599
  • [24] Long-term outcomes and predictors of failure after surgery for stage IV apical pelvic organ prolapse
    Linder, Brian J.
    El-Nashar, Sherif A.
    Mukwege, Alain A.
    Weaver, Amy L.
    McGree, Michaela E.
    Rhodes, Deborah J.
    Gebhart, John B.
    Klingele, Christopher J.
    Occhino, John A.
    Trabuco, Emanuel C.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2018, 29 (06) : 803 - 810
  • [25] Outcomes and predictors of failure of trocar-guided vaginal mesh surgery for pelvic organ prolapse
    Milani, Alfredo L.
    Withagen, Mariella I. J.
    Vierhout, Mark E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 206 (05) : 440.e1 - 440.e8
  • [26] Factors influencing the outcome of surgery for pelvic organ prolapse
    Bohlin, Katja Stenstrom
    Ankardal, Maud
    Nussler, Emil
    Lindkvist, Hakan
    Milsom, Ian
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2018, 29 (01) : 81 - 89
  • [27] Effect of pelvic floor status on the outcome of pelvic organ prolapse surgery
    Dvorak, J.
    Masata, J.
    Fucik, T.
    Martan, A.
    Svabik, K.
    CESKA GYNEKOLOGIE-CZECH GYNAECOLOGY, 2023, 88 (06): : 463 - 466
  • [28] Medium-Term Anatomical and Functional Results of Isolated Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy for Female Pelvic Organ Prolapse during the Early Learning Curve
    Shekhar, Shashank
    Goyal, Shuchita
    Goel, Manu
    Sharma, Charu
    Jhirwal, Manisha
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY OF INDIA, 2021, 71 (01) : 91 - 94
  • [29] Medium-Term Anatomical and Functional Results of Isolated Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy for Female Pelvic Organ Prolapse during the Early Learning Curve
    Shashank Shekhar
    Shuchita Goyal
    Manu Goel
    Charu Sharma
    Manisha Jhirwal
    The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India, 2021, 71 : 91 - 94
  • [30] Robotic-Assisted Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Sacrocolpopexy and Beyond
    Linder, Brian J. J.
    Occhino, John A. A.
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY, 2023, 39 (01) : 25 - 29