Opportunities and Challenges to Advance Health Equity Using Digital Health Tools in Underserved Communities in Southeast US: A Mixed Methods Study

被引:4
|
作者
Blount, Mitchell A. [1 ,6 ]
Douglas, Megan D. [1 ,2 ]
Li, Chaohua [1 ]
Walston, Denita T. [1 ]
Nelms, Phoebe L. [1 ]
Hughes, Carmen L. [1 ]
Gaglioti, Anne H. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Mack, Dominic H. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Morehouse Sch Med, Natl Ctr Primary Care, Atlanta, GA USA
[2] Morehouse Sch Med, Dept Community Hlth & Prevent Med, Atlanta, GA USA
[3] Metrohlth Syst, Cleveland, OH USA
[4] Case Western Reserve Univ, Sch Med, Cleveland, OH USA
[5] Morehouse Sch Med, Dept Family Med, Atlanta, GA USA
[6] Morehouse Sch Med, Natl Ctr Primary Care, 720 Westview Dr SW, Atlanta, GA 30310 USA
关键词
primary care; health technology; digital tools; COVID-19; health equity; TECHNOLOGY; TRENDS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1177/21501319231184789
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Introduction:Over the last 30 years, the adoption of health information technology and digital health tools (DHTs) into the US health system has been instrumental to improving access to care, especially for people living in rural, underserved, and underrepresented communities. Despite widespread adoption of DHTs by primary care clinicians, documented challenges have contributed to inequitable use and benefit. The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated rapid adoption of DHTs, accelerated by state and federal policy changes, in order to meet patient needs and ensure access to care. Methods:The Digital Health Tools Study employed a mixed methods approach to assess adoption and use of DHTs by primary care clinicians in southeastern states and identify individual- and practice-level barriers and facilitators to DHT implementation. A survey was conducted using a multi-modal recruitment strategy: newsletters, meeting/conference presentations, social media, and emails/calls. Focus groups were conducted to assess priorities, barriers, and facilitators and were recorded/transcribed verbatim. Descriptive statistics were calculated for survey results, produced for the whole sample, and stratified by state. Thematic analysis was conducted of focus group transcripts. Results:There were 1215 survey respondents. About 55 participants who had missing demographic information were excluded from the analysis. About 99% of clinicians used DHTs in the last 5 years, modalities included: telehealth (66%), electronic health records (EHRs; 66%), patient portals (49%), health information exchange (HIE; 41%), prescription drug monitoring programs (39%), remote/home monitoring (27%), and wearable devices (22%). Time (53%) and cost (51%) were identified as barriers. About 61% and 75% of clinicians reported being "satisfied" to "very satisfied" with telemedicine and EHRs, respectively. Seven focus groups with 25 clinicians were conducted and indicated COVID-19 and the use of supplemental tools/apps to connect patients to resources as major motivators for adopting DHTs. Challenges included incomplete and difficult-to-utilize HIE interfaces for providers and internet/broadband access and poor connectivity for patients. Conclusions:This study describes the impact adopting DHTs by primary care clinicians has on expanded access to healthcare and reducing health disparities in regions with longstanding health and social inequities. The findings identify opportunities to leverage DHTs to advance health equity and highlight opportunities for policy improvement.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Interdisciplinary Collaborations in Digital Health Research: Mixed Methods Case Study
    Krause-Juettler, Grit
    Weitz, Juergen
    Bork, Ulrich
    JMIR HUMAN FACTORS, 2022, 9 (02):
  • [32] Digital Health Information Disparities in Older Adults: a Mixed Methods Study
    Ruth M. Tappen
    Mary E. Cooley
    Roger Luckmann
    Somi Panday
    Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities, 2022, 9 : 82 - 92
  • [33] USING MHEALTH TO ADDRESS HEALTH BEHAVIORS IN HIGH RISK POPULATIONS: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES TO ADVANCE A RESEARCH AGENDA
    Aschbrenner, Kelly
    Spring, Bonnie
    Naslund, John A.
    Brunette, Mary F.
    Carpenter-Song, Elizabeth
    Ferron, Joelle C.
    ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2016, 50 : S179 - S179
  • [34] Client/patient perceptions of achieving equity in primary health care: a mixed methods study
    Akhavan, Sharareh
    Tillgren, Per
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR EQUITY IN HEALTH, 2015, 14 : 1 - 12
  • [35] Client/patient perceptions of achieving equity in primary health care: a mixed methods study
    Sharareh Akhavan
    Per Tillgren
    International Journal for Equity in Health, 14
  • [36] Challenges faced by community health nurses to achieve universal health coverage in Myanmar:A mixed methods study
    Sein Yaw May
    Naw Clara
    Ohn Khin Khin
    Win Win Mar
    Aye Nandar Han
    Su Su Maw
    International Journal of Nursing Sciences, 2021, 8 (03) : 271 - 278
  • [37] Challenges faced by community health nurses to achieve universal health coverage in Myanmar: A mixed methods study
    May, Sein Yaw
    Clara, Naw
    Khin, Ohn Khin
    Mar, Win Win
    Han, Aye Nandar
    Maw, Su Su
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING SCIENCES, 2021, 8 (03) : 271 - 278
  • [38] WE CAN BUILD THE TOOLS, BUT WHO WILL SUSTAIN THEM? CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES WHEN IMPLEMENTING DIGITAL HEALTH INTERVENTIONS
    Goldstein, Carly M.
    Thomas, J. Graham
    Brewer, LaPrincess C.
    Graham, Andrea K.
    ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2022, 56 (SUPP 1) : S469 - S469
  • [39] Health literacy in former Soviet Union immigrants in the US: A mixed methods study
    Kostareva, Uliana
    Albright, Cheryl L.
    Berens, Eva-Maria
    Klinger, Julia
    Ivanov, Luba L.
    Guttersrud, Oystein
    Liu, Min
    Sentell, Tetine L.
    APPLIED NURSING RESEARCH, 2022, 67
  • [40] A Mixed Methods Study Examining Citizenship Among Youth With Mental Health Challenges
    Jordan, Gerald
    Burke, Laura
    Bailey, Julia
    Kreidstein, Sof
    Iftikhar, Myera
    Plamondon, Lauren
    Young, Courtney
    Davidson, Larry
    Rowe, Michael
    Bellamy, Chyrell
    Abdel-Baki, Amal
    Iyer, Srividya N.
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 13