Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference of EQ-5D-5L in patients with coronary heart disease after percutaneous coronary intervention: A longitudinal study

被引:13
作者
Zheng, Yu [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Dou, Lei [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Fu, Qiang [4 ]
Li, Shunping [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Univ, Cheeloo Coll Med, Ctr Hlth Management & Policy Res, Sch Publ Hlth, Jinan, Shandong, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Univ, NHC Key Lab Hlth Econ & Policy Res, Jinan, Shandong, Peoples R China
[3] Shandong Univ, Ctr Hlth Preference Res, Jinan, Shandong, Peoples R China
[4] Tianjin Med Univ, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, Gen Hosp, Tianjin, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE | 2023年 / 10卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
responsiveness; minimal clinically important difference; minimal detectable change; EQ-5D-5L; coronary heart disease; percutaneous coronary intervention; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; SEATTLE ANGINA QUESTIONNAIRE; HEALTH-STATUS; MEANINGFUL CHANGE; INTRAINDIVIDUAL CHANGES; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; INDEX; VALIDITY; VERSION; SCORES;
D O I
10.3389/fcvm.2023.1074969
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BackgroundAlthough the five-level version of the EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) has been validated in various diseases, no empirical study has evaluated the responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of the instrument in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD), which limits the interpretability and clinical application of EQ-5D-5L. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the responsiveness and MCID of EQ-5D-5L in patients with CHD who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and identify the relationship between the MCID values and minimal detectable change (MDC). MethodsPatients with CHD were recruited for this longitudinal study at the Tianjin Medical University's General Hospital in China. At baseline and 4 weeks after PCI, participants completed the EQ-5D-5L and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ). Additionally, we used the effect size (ES) to assess the responsiveness of EQ-5D-5L. The anchor-based, distribution-based, and instrument-based methods were used in this study to calculate the MCID estimates. The MCID estimates to MDC ratios were computed at the individual and group levels at a 95% CI. ResultsSeventy-five patients with CHD completed the survey at both baseline and follow-up. The EQ-5D-5L health state utility (HSU) improved by 0.125 at follow-up compared with baseline. The ES of EQ-5D HSU was 0.850 in all patients and 1.152 in those who improved, indicating large responsiveness. The average (range) MCID value of the EQ-5D-5L HSU was 0.071 (0.052-0.098). These values can only be used to determine whether the change in scores were clinically meaningful at the group level. ConclusionEQ-5D-5L has large responsiveness among CHD patients after undergoing PCI surgery. Future studies should focus on calculating the responsiveness and MCID for deterioration and examining the health changes at the individual level in CHD patients.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 74 条
  • [1] Many faces of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID): a literature review and directions for future research
    Beaton, DE
    Boers, M
    Wells, GA
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN RHEUMATOLOGY, 2002, 14 (02) : 109 - 114
  • [2] Understanding the relevance of measured change through studies of responsiveness
    Beaton, DE
    [J]. SPINE, 2000, 25 (24) : 3192 - 3199
  • [3] Self-reported health following percutaneous coronary intervention: results from a cohort followed for 3 years with multiple measurements
    Biering, Karin
    Frydenberg, Morten
    Hjollund, Niels Henrik
    [J]. CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2014, 6 : 441 - 449
  • [4] Bilbao A., 2018, QUAL LIFE RES, P1
  • [5] Psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L in patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis: reliability, validity and responsiveness
    Bilbao, Amaia
    Garcia-Perez, Lidia
    Carlos Arenaza, Juan
    Garcia, Isidoro
    Ariza-Cardiel, Gloria
    Trujillo-Martin, Elisa
    Joao Forjaz, Maria
    Martin-Fernandez, Jesus
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2018, 27 (11) : 2897 - 2908
  • [6] Meaningful change in cancer-specific quality of life scores: Differences between improvement and worsening
    Cella, D
    Hahn, EA
    Dineen, K
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2002, 11 (03) : 207 - 221
  • [7] Validity, responsiveness, and minimal clinically important difference of EQ-5D-5L in stroke patients undergoing rehabilitation
    Chen, Poyu
    Lin, Keh-Chung
    Liing, Rong-Jiuan
    Wu, Ching-Yi
    Chen, Chia-Ling
    Chang, Ku-Chou
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2016, 25 (06) : 1585 - 1596
  • [8] Comparison of EQ-5D-5L and SPVU-5D for measuring quality of life in patients with venous leg ulcers in an Australian setting
    Cheng, Qinglu
    Kularatna, Sanjeewa
    Lee, Xing J.
    Graves, Nicholas
    Pacella, Rosana E.
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2019, 28 (07) : 1903 - 1911
  • [9] Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the functional assessment of cancer therapy: Cognitive function (FACT-Cog) in breast cancer patients
    Cheung, Yin Ting
    Foo, Yu Lee
    Shwe, Maung
    Tan, Yee Pin
    Fan, Gilbert
    Yong, Wei Sean
    Madhukumar, Preetha
    Ooi, Wei Seong
    Chay, Wen Yee
    Dent, Rebecca A.
    Ang, Soo Fan
    Lo, Soo Kien
    Yap, Yoon Sim
    Ng, Raymond
    Chan, Alexandre
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2014, 67 (07) : 811 - 820
  • [10] Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: a review of concepts and methods
    Copay, Anne G.
    Subach, Brian R.
    Glassman, Steven D.
    Polly, David W., Jr.
    Schuler, Thomas C.
    [J]. SPINE JOURNAL, 2007, 7 (05) : 541 - 546