Life-cycle comparisons of economic and environmental consequences for pig production with four different models in China

被引:6
作者
Wu, Huijun [1 ]
Liu, Yongxin [1 ]
Dai, Chengjuan [1 ]
Ye, Yuanyuan [1 ]
Zhu, Huimin [1 ]
Fang, Weixin [1 ]
机构
[1] Anhui Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Earth & Environm, Huainan 232001, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Life cycle assessment; Pig production system; Domestic breeding; Scale breeding; Environmental management; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; NITROGEN USE EFFICIENCY; EMERGY ANALYSIS; CARBON FOOTPRINT; CROP PRODUCTION; LAND-USE; PHOSPHORUS MANAGEMENT; LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION; POULTRY PRODUCTION; PRODUCTION SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-024-32541-5
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
China, the world's largest consumer and producer of pork in the world, is attracting increasing attention due to the environmental impacts of its pig production. Previous studies seldom comprehensively compare the environmental impacts of the pig production system with different models, resulting in different intensities of environmental impacts. We aim to comprehensively evaluate Chinese pig production with different breeding models and explore a more sustainable way for pig production. We use life cycle assessment (LCA) to evaluate and compare environmental impacts of pig production system with four main breeding models in China from 1998 to 2020: domestic breeding, small-scale breeding, medium-scale breeding, and large-scale breeding. The life cycle encompasses fertilizer production, feed production, feed processing, pig raising, waste treatment, and slaughtering. The impact categories including energy consumption (EN), global warming (GWP), acidification (AP), eutrophication (EU), water use (WD), and land occupation (LO) are expressed with "100 kg live weight of fattening pig at farm gate." The results show that driven by governmental support, growing meat demand, and cost advantage, the scale breeding especially large-scale breeding simultaneously yielded greater net economic benefit and less environmental impact compared to other breeding models especially the domestic breeding. Due to mineral fertilizer application, feed production contributed over 50% of the total environmental impacts. Notably, the composition of feeds exerted significant influence on the environmental impacts arising from fertilizer production and feed processing. Furthermore, attributable to the substantial use of electricity and heat, as well as the concomitant emissions, pig raising contributed the largest GWP, while ranking second in terms of AP and EU. Notably, waste management constituted the third-largest EU, AP, and WD. In addition to promote scale breeding, we put forth several sustainable measures encompassing feed composition, cultivation practices, fertilizer utilization, and waste management for consideration.
引用
收藏
页码:21668 / 21686
页数:19
相关论文
共 165 条
  • [1] Environmental assesment of intensive egg production: A Spanish case study
    Abin, Rocio
    Laca, Amanda
    Laca, Adriana
    Diaz, Mario
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 179 : 160 - 168
  • [2] Life Cycle Assessment for the Cuban pig production: Case study in Sancti Spiritus
    Alba Reyes, Yasmani
    Barrera, Ernesto L.
    Sarduy Valle, Anisley
    Perez Gil, Maylier
    Hermida Garcia, Orestes
    Dewulf, Jo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 219 : 99 - 109
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2006, ISO14040 - Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Principles and framework
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2011, Internal Report
  • [5] Energy and carbon footprints of chicken and pork from intensive production systems in Argentina
    Arrieta, Ezequiel M.
    Gonzalez, Alejandro D.
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 673 : 20 - 28
  • [6] Atakora J. K. A., 2003, Banff Pork Seminar Proceedings 2003. Keeping Canada Competitive, Banff, Alberta, Canada, pA16
  • [7] Multi-criteria research lines on livestock manure biorefinery development towards a circular economy: From the perspective of a life cycle assessment and business models strategies
    Awasthi, Sanjeev Kumar
    Kumar, Manish
    Sarsaiya, Surendra
    Ahluwalia, Vivek
    Chen, Hongyu
    Kaur, Guneet
    Sirohi, Ranjna
    Sindhu, Raveendran
    Binod, Parameswaran
    Pandey, Ashok
    Rathour, Rashmi
    Kumar, Sunil
    Singh, Lal
    Zhang, Zengqiang
    Taherzadeh, Mohammad J.
    Awasthi, Mukesh Kumar
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 341
  • [8] Recycling phosphorus by fast pyrolysis of pig manure: Concentration and extraction of phosphorus combined with formation of value-added pyrolysis products
    Azuara, Manuel
    Kersten, Sascha R. A.
    Kootstra, A. Maarten J.
    [J]. BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2013, 49 : 171 - 180
  • [9] Changes in Pig Production in China and Their Effects on Nitrogen and Phosphorus Use and Losses
    Bai, Z. H.
    Ma, L.
    Qin, W.
    Chen, Q.
    Oenema, O.
    Zhang, F. S.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 48 (21) : 12742 - 12749
  • [10] China's livestock transition: Driving forces, impacts, and consequences
    Bai, Zhaohai
    Ma, Wenqi
    Ma, Lin
    Velthof, Gerard L.
    Wei, Zhibiao
    Havlik, Petr
    Oenema, Oene
    Lee, Michael R. F.
    Zhang, Fusuo
    [J]. SCIENCE ADVANCES, 2018, 4 (07):