Patient safety incidents in endoscopy: a human factors analysis of nonprocedural significant harm incidents from the National Reporting and Learning System (NRLS)

被引:2
|
作者
Ravindran, Srivathsan [1 ,2 ,3 ,9 ]
Matharoo, Manmeet [3 ]
Rutter, Matthew David [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Ashrafian, Hutan [2 ,6 ]
Darzi, Ara [2 ,6 ]
Healey, Chris [7 ]
Thomas-Gibson, Siwan [3 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Royal Coll Physicians, Joint Advisory Grp Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, London, England
[2] Imperial Coll London, Surg & Canc, London, England
[3] St Marks Hosp & Acad Inst, Wolfson Unit Endoscopy, London, England
[4] Univ Hosp North Tees, Gastroenterol, Stockton On Tees, England
[5] Newcastle Univ, Fac Med Sci, Populat Hlth Sci Inst, Newcastle Upon Tyne, England
[6] Imperial Coll London, Inst Global Hlth Innovat, London, England
[7] Airedale NHS Fdn Trust, Gastroenterol, Keighley, England
[8] Imperial Coll London, Metab Digest & Reprod, London, England
[9] Royal Coll Physicians, Joint Advisory Grp Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, St Andrews Pl 11, London NW1 4LE, England
关键词
ADVERSE EVENTS; SOCIETY;
D O I
10.1055/a-2177-4130
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Despite advances in understanding and reducing the risk of endoscopic procedures, there is little consideration of the safety of the wider endoscopy service. Patient safety incidents (PSIs) still occur. We sought to identify nonprocedural PSIs (nPSIs) and their causative factors from a human factors perspective and generate ideas for safety improvement.Methods Endoscopy-specific PSI reports were extracted from the National Reporting and Learning System (NRLS). A retrospective, cross-sectional human factors analysis of data was performed. Two independent researchers coded data using a hybrid thematic analysis approach. The Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS) was used to code contributory factors. Analysis informed creation of driver diagrams and key recommendations for safety improvement in endoscopy.Results From 2017 to 2019, 1181 endoscopy-specific PSIs of significant harm were reported across England and Wales, with 539 (45.6%) being nPSIs. Five categories accounted for over 80% of all incidents, with "follow-up and surveillance" being the largest (23.4% of all nPSIs). From the free-text incident reports, 487 human factors codes were identified. Decision-based errors were the most common act prior to PSI occurrence. Other frequent preconditions to incidents were focused on environmental factors, particularly overwhelmed resources, patient factors, and ineffective team communication. Lack of staffing, standard operating procedures, effective systems, and clinical pathways were also contributory. Seven key recommendations for improving safety have been made in response to our findings.Conclusions This was the first national-level human factors analysis of endoscopy-specific PSIs. This work will inform safety improvement strategies and should empower individual services to review their approach to safety.
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 99
页数:11
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] Integrating Data From the UK National Reporting and Learning System With Work Domain Analysis to Understand Patient Safety Incidents in Community Pharmacy
    Phipps, Denham L.
    Tam, W. Vanessa
    Ashcroft, Darren M.
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT SAFETY, 2017, 13 (01) : 6 - 13
  • [2] Critical incident reporting system-safety and handling of critical incidents in endoscopy
    Siegel, Julian
    Rosien, Ulrich
    GASTROENTEROLOGE, 2022, 17 (01): : 34 - 41
  • [3] Learning from patient safety incidents: The Green Cross method
    Jacobsen, Hilde Kristin
    Ballangrud, Randi
    Birkeli, Gorill Helen
    NURSING IN CRITICAL CARE, 2025, 30 (02)
  • [4] Patient safety incidents are common in primary care: A national prospective active incident reporting survey
    Michel, Philippe
    Brami, Jean
    Chaneliere, Marc
    Kret, Marion
    Mosnier, Anne
    Dupie, Isabelle
    Haeringer-Cholet, Anouk
    Keriel-Gascou, Maud
    Maradan, Claire
    Villebrun, Frederic
    Makeham, Meredith
    Quenon, Jean-Luc
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (02):
  • [5] Trend Analysis of Patient Safety Incidents and Their Associated Factors in Korea Using National Patient Safety Report Data (2017∼2019)
    Shin, Sunhwa
    Won, Mihwa
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (16)
  • [6] LEARNING FROM PATIENT SAFETY INCIDENTS IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Amaniyan, Sara
    Faldaas, Bjorn Ove
    Logan, Patricia A.
    Vaismoradi, Mojtaba
    JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2020, 58 (02): : 234 - 244
  • [7] Factors contributing to patient safety incidents in primary care: a descriptive analysis of patient safety incidents in a French study using CADYA (categorization of errors in primary care)
    Chaneliere, M.
    Koehler, D.
    Morlan, T.
    Berra, J.
    Colin, C.
    Dupie, I.
    Michel, P.
    BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2018, 19
  • [8] Results of provisional use of a system for voluntary anonymous reporting of incidents that threaten patient safety in the emergency medical services of Asturias
    Galvan Nunez, Pablo
    Santander Barrios, Maria Dolores
    Villa Alvarez, Maria Cristina
    Castro Delgado, Rafael
    Alonso Lorenzo, Julio C.
    Arcos Gonzalez, Pedro
    EMERGENCIAS, 2016, 28 (03): : 146 - 152
  • [9] Learning from Taiwan patient-safety reporting system
    Lin, Chung-Chih
    Shih, Chung-Liang
    Liao, Hsun-Hsiang
    Wung, Cathy H. Y.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2012, 81 (12) : 834 - 841
  • [10] A cross-sectional mixed methods study protocol to generate learning from patient safety incidents reported from general practice
    Carson-Stevens, Andrew
    Hibbert, Peter
    Avery, Anthony
    Butlin, Amy
    Carter, Ben
    Cooper, Alison
    Evans, Huw Prosser
    Gibson, Russell
    Luff, Donna
    Makeham, Meredith
    McEnhill, Paul
    Panesar, Sukhmeet S.
    Parry, Gareth
    Rees, Philippa
    Shiels, Emma
    Sheikh, Aziz
    Ward, Hope Olivia
    Williams, Huw
    Wood, Fiona
    Donaldson, Liam
    Edwards, Adrian
    BMJ OPEN, 2015, 5 (12):