A hybrid Bayesian network for medical device risk assessment and management

被引:5
作者
Hunte, Joshua L. [1 ]
Neil, Martin [1 ,2 ]
Fenton, Norman E. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Queen Mary Univ London, Sch Elect Engn & Comp Sci, Risk & Informat Management Res Grp, London E1 4NS, England
[2] Agena Ltd, Cambridge, England
关键词
Medical device; ISO; 14971; Medical device risk management; Bayesian networks; Risk assessment; FAULT-TREE ANALYSIS; OF-THE-ART; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ress.2023.109630
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Risk analysis methods for medical devices, including fault tree analysis, have limitations such as handling uncertainty and providing reasonable risk estimates with limited or no testing data. To address these limitations, this paper proposes a novel systematic method for medical device risk management using hybrid Bayesian networks (BNs). We apply the method to a Defibrillator device to demonstrate the process involved for risk management during production and post-production using 4 different scenarios: (1) where there are available testing data; (2) where there are limited or no testing data; (3) where it is a completely new device with no testing data; (4) where we are reassessing the risk of a previous model on the market based on reported hazards and injuries. In each scenario, the BN model, for the available data, provides the full probability of failure per demand distribution for each category of injury severity (fatal, critical, major, minor, negligible) and the probabilities associated with various risk acceptability criteria. The model results are validated using publicly available data for the LIFEPAK 1000 Defibrillator (PN: 320371500XX), which was recalled by Physio-Control in 2017. The results show that the device would fail the acceptability criteria for probability of fatal injury.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 75 条
[31]   An overview of fault tree analysis and its application in model based dependability analysis [J].
Kabir, Sohag .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2017, 77 :114-135
[32]   Safety analysis in process facilities: Comparison of fault tree and Bayesian network approaches [J].
Khakzad, Nima ;
Khan, Faisal ;
Amyotte, Paul .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2011, 96 (08) :925-932
[33]  
Koller D., 2009, PROBABILISTIC GRAPHI
[34]   A comprehensive scoping review of Bayesian networks in healthcare: Past, present and future [J].
Kyrimi, Evangelia ;
McLachlan, Scott ;
Dube, Kudakwashe ;
Neves, Mariana R. ;
Fahmi, Ali ;
Fenton, Norman .
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MEDICINE, 2021, 117
[35]   Hybrid Bayesian network-based landslide risk assessment method for modeling risk for industrial facilities subjected to landslides [J].
Lan, Meng ;
Zhu, Jiping ;
Lo, Siuming .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2021, 215
[36]   Dynamic Bayesian network model for comprehensive risk analysis of fatigue-critical structural details [J].
Lee, Dooyoul ;
Kwon, Kybeom .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2023, 229
[37]   Bayesian-network-based safety risk assessment for steel construction projects [J].
Leu, Sou-Sen ;
Chang, Ching-Miao .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2013, 54 :122-133
[38]   Assessment of failure rates and reliability of floating offshore wind turbines [J].
Li, He ;
Soares, C. Guedes .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2022, 228
[39]   Data-driven Bayesian network for risk analysis of global maritime accidents [J].
Li, Huanhuan ;
Ren, Xujie ;
Yang, Zaili .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2023, 230
[40]   Dynamic risk assessment in healthcare based on Bayesian approach [J].
Li, Mei ;
Liu, Zixian ;
Li, Xiaopeng ;
Liu, Yiliu .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2019, 189 :327-334