Use of a digital contact tracing system in Singapore to mitigate COVID-19 spread

被引:4
作者
Chow, Bryan W. K. [1 ,2 ]
Lim, Yi Ding [2 ]
Poh, Richard C. H. [2 ]
Ko, Amy [2 ]
Hong, Guo Hao [2 ]
Zou, Steffen W. L. [2 ]
Cheah, Joshua [2 ]
Ho, Shaowei [3 ]
Lee, Vernon J. M. [2 ,4 ]
Ho, Marc Z. J. [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Hlth Syst, Prevent Med Residency Program, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Minist Hlth, Communicable Dis Div, Singapore, Singapore
[3] Govt Technol Agcy, Prime Ministers Off, Singapore, Singapore
[4] Natl Univ Singapore, Saw Swee Hock Sch Publ Hlth, Singapore, Singapore
关键词
COVID-19; Contact Tracing; Digital Health; Communicable Diseases Control; Epidemiology;
D O I
10.1186/s12889-023-17150-0
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
BackgroundContact tracing has been essential to reducing spread of COVID-19. Singapore leveraged technology to assist with contact tracing efforts using a Bluetooth-based app and token platform called 'TraceTogether'.MethodsWe reviewed the impact of this system during the country's Delta and Omicron waves (24 August 2021 to 17 February 2022) to identify differences in number of close contacts and time savings between full automation using TraceTogether alone as compared to manual contact tracing supplemented by TraceTogether. Characteristics of digital contact tracing app or token users were reviewed. Thereafter, the number of close contacts identified by manual and digital contact tracing methods, and the number of confirmed COVID-19 cases among contacts were analysed. The difference in time taken for identification of close contacts was also determined.FindingsAdoption rate for TraceTogether was high, with 93.3% of cases having a registered device. There was a 9.8 h (34.9%) reduction in time savings for close contacts to be informed using TraceTogether alone compared to manual contact tracing supplemented by TraceTogether. The proportion of close contacts automatically identified through TraceTogether alone and turned positive was 3.6%. For those identified through manual contact tracing supplemented by TraceTogether, this proportion was 12.5% and 6.2% for those served quarantine orders and health risk warnings respectively.InterpretationThe high adoption rate of 'TraceTogether' suggest that digital solutions remain a promising option to improve contact tracing in future epidemics. This may have been through its concurrent use with vaccine differentiated public health measures and policies which engender public trust. There is future potential for utilising such technology in managing communicable diseases to achieve good public health outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Contact tracing with digital assistance in Taiwan's COVID-19 outbreak response
    Jian, Shu-Wan
    Cheng, Hao-Yuan
    Huang, Xiang-Ting
    Liu, Ding-Ping
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2020, 101 : 348 - 352
  • [22] A national survey of attitudes to COVID-19 digital contact tracing in the Republic of Ireland
    Michael Edmund O’Callaghan
    Jim Buckley
    Brian Fitzgerald
    Kevin Johnson
    John Laffey
    Bairbre McNicholas
    Bashar Nuseibeh
    Derek O’Keeffe
    Ian O’Keeffe
    Abdul Razzaq
    Kaavya Rekanar
    Ita Richardson
    Andrew Simpkin
    Jaynal Abedin
    Cristiano Storni
    Damyanka Tsvyatkova
    Jane Walsh
    Thomas Welsh
    Liam Glynn
    Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -), 2021, 190 : 863 - 887
  • [23] Effect of manual and digital contact tracing on COVID-19 outbreaks: a study on empirical contact data
    Barrat, A.
    Cattuto, C.
    Kivela, M.
    Lehmann, S.
    Saramaeki, J.
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY INTERFACE, 2021, 18 (178)
  • [24] Systematic scoping review of the implementation, adoption, use, and effectiveness of digital contact tracing interventions for COVID-19 in the Western Pacific Region
    Bannister-Tyrrell, Melanie
    Chen, Mengji
    Choi, Vladimir
    Miglietta, Alessandro
    Galea, Gauden
    LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH-WESTERN PACIFIC, 2023, 34
  • [25] COVID-19 contact tracing: The Welsh experience
    Bright, Diana
    Brown, Graham
    Roberts, Richard J.
    Cottrell, Simon
    Gould, Ashley
    Jesurasa, Amrita
    Daniels, Philip
    Davies, Llion
    PUBLIC HEALTH IN PRACTICE, 2020, 1
  • [26] Fundamental limitations of contact tracing for COVID-19
    Tupper, Paul
    Otto, Sarah P.
    Colijn, Caroline
    FACETS, 2021, 6 : 1993 - 2001
  • [27] A Survey of COVID-19 Contact Tracing Apps
    Ahmed, Nadeem
    Michelin, Regio A.
    Xue, Wanli
    Ruj, Sushmita
    Malaney, Robert
    Kanhere, Salil S.
    Seneviratne, Aruna
    Hu, Wen
    Janicke, Helge
    Jha, Sanjay K.
    IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 (08): : 134577 - 134601
  • [28] COVID-19 Contact Tracing Using Blockchain
    Hasan, Haya R.
    Salah, Khaled
    Jayaraman, Raja
    Yaqoob, Ibrar
    Omar, Mohammed
    Ellahham, Samer
    IEEE ACCESS, 2021, 9 : 62956 - 62971
  • [29] Digital contact tracing during the COVID-19 pandemic in France: Associated factors and reasons for non-use
    Touzani, Rajae
    Schultz, Emilien
    Vandentorren, Stephanie
    Arwidson, Pierre
    Guillemin, Francis
    Bouhnik, Anne-Deborah
    Rouquette, Alexandra
    Mancini, Julien
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2023, 171
  • [30] Camera-based distance detection and contact tracing to monitor potential spread of COVID-19
    Li, Ming
    Varble, Nicole
    Turkbey, Baris
    Xu, Sheng
    Wood, Brad J.
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2022: IMAGE PERCEPTION, OBSERVER PERFORMANCE, AND TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2022, 12035