The real effects of ESG reporting and GRI standards on carbon mitigation: International evidence

被引:76
作者
Luo, Le [1 ]
Tang, Qingliang [2 ]
机构
[1] Macquarie Univ, Macquarie Business Sch, 4 Eastern Rd, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia
[2] Western Sydney Univ, Sch Business, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
carbon accounting; carbon mitigation; climate change; ESG; GHG emissions; global reporting initiative (GRI); SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; ENVIRONMENTAL DISCLOSURE; FIRM-VALUE; CORPORATE ACCOUNTABILITY; NONFINANCIAL DISCLOSURE; BOARD CHARACTERISTICS; GOVERNANCE; PERFORMANCE; INFORMATION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1002/bse.3281
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study explores the real effects of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) reporting and the adoption of global reporting initiative (GRI) standards on carbon mitigation. Using a sample of large international companies, our empirical evidence does not show that a general form of ESG reporting is associated with carbon mitigation. However, after controlling for ESG reporting, firms that follow GRI standards when preparing their ESG reports are more likely to achieve greater carbon mitigation. Channel tests show that such firms tend to set more proactive carbon strategies and policies, make environmental investments, and actively engage with stakeholders. Finally, we find that the real effects of GRI standards tend to occur mainly in weak institutional settings (e.g., countries with less stringent carbon regulations, lower climate consciousness, and weaker legal enforcement). Overall, the central insight of the study is that standardized ESG reporting under GRI plays a soft substituting role in promoting green aspirations in an institution void of a high degree of global warming awareness.
引用
收藏
页码:2985 / 3000
页数:16
相关论文
共 91 条
[71]   Agency Problems of Corporate Philanthropy [J].
Masulis, Ronald W. ;
Reza, Syed Walid .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2015, 28 (02) :592-636
[72]   Firm-Value Effects of Carbon Emissions and Carbon Disclosures [J].
Matsumura, Ella Mae ;
Prakash, Rachna ;
Vera-Munoz, Sandra C. .
ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2014, 89 (02) :695-724
[73]   Institutional ownership and corporate social performance: The moderating effects of investment horizon, activism, and coordination [J].
Neubaum, DO ;
Zahra, SA .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2006, 32 (01) :108-131
[74]   Estimating Standard Errors in Finance Panel Data Sets: Comparing Approaches [J].
Petersen, Mitchell A. .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2009, 22 (01) :435-480
[75]   Voluntary environmental disclosure quality and firm value: Further evidence [J].
Plumlee, Marlene ;
Brown, Darrell ;
Hayes, Rachel M. ;
Marshall, R. Scott .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2015, 34 (04) :336-361
[76]  
PORTER ME, 1995, HARVARD BUS REV, V73, P120
[77]   Revisiting carbon disclosure and performance: Legitimacy and management views [J].
Qian, Wei ;
Schaltegger, Stefan .
BRITISH ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2017, 49 (04) :365-379
[78]   DETERMINANTS OF CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY DISCLOSURE - AN APPLICATION OF STAKEHOLDER THEORY [J].
ROBERTS, RW .
ACCOUNTING ORGANIZATIONS AND SOCIETY, 1992, 17 (06) :595-612
[79]   The effects of financial reporting and disclosure on corporate investment: A review [J].
Roychowdhury, Sugata ;
Shroff, Nemit ;
Verdi, Rodrigo S. .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2019, 68 (2-3)
[80]   Carbon Disclosure, Contextual Factors, and Information Asymmetry: The Case of Physical Risk Reporting [J].
Schiemann, Frank ;
Sakhel, Alice .
EUROPEAN ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2019, 28 (04) :791-818