Training and assessment using the LapSim laparoscopic simulator: a scoping review of validity evidence

被引:7
作者
Toale, Conor [1 ]
Morris, Marie [1 ]
Kavanagh, Dara O. [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal Coll Surgeons Ireland, Dept Surg Affairs, 121 St Stephens Green, Dublin D02 YN77 2, Ireland
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2023年 / 37卷 / 03期
关键词
Surgery; Simulation; Assessment; Technical skill; Competency-based education; Operative performance; Virtual reality; VIRTUAL-REALITY SIMULATOR; CONSTRUCT-VALIDITY; OBJECTIVE ASSESSMENT; SKILLS ASSESSMENT; TECHNICAL SKILLS; OPERATING-ROOM; BOX TRAINER; SURGERY; PERFORMANCE; SALPINGECTOMY;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-022-09593-0
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction The LapSim (Surgical Science, Sweden) laparoscopic simulator is a high-fidelity virtual reality simulator for use in endoscopic surgical training. This review critiques the current validity evidence for the LapSim laparoscopic simulator, specifically with respect to its potential use as a tool and method of training and assessment in surgery. Methods A scoping review of the MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, Cochrane and Web of Science databases was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines (2020)-scoping review extension. Articles were included if they presented validity evidence for the use of the LapSim in operative skill training or assessment, in accordance with Messick's validity framework. European Association of Endoscopic Surgeons (EAES) guidelines (2005) were used to provide recommendations for the use of the LapSim in operative performance training and assessments. Results Forty-nine articles were included. An EAES level 2 recommendation was provided with regard to the internal consistency reliability of automated performance metrics in assessing performance. An EAES recommendation of 2 was awarded with respect to the ability of the LapSim to discriminate based on case volume and overall laparoscopic experience (relationships with other variables). Performance assessment metrics on the LapSim correlate with improved performance in the operating room (EAES level of recommendation 1-consequential validity). Conclusion The LapSim has accumulated substantial evidence supporting the validity of its use in surgical training and assessment. Future studies should explore the relationship between the achievement of performance benchmarks on the LapSim and subsequent patient outcomes, and interrogate the benefits of implementing virtual reality simulation training and assessment curricula in post-graduate surgical training programmes.
引用
收藏
页码:1658 / 1671
页数:14
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   Virtual reality simulation training can improve technical skills during laparoscopic salpingectomy for ectopic pregnancy [J].
Aggarwal, R. ;
Tully, A. ;
Grantcharov, T. ;
Larsen, C. R. ;
Miskry, T. ;
Farthing, A. ;
Darzi, A. .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2006, 113 (12) :1382-1387
[2]   An evidence-based virtual reality training program for novice laparoscopic surgeons [J].
Aggarwal, Rajesh ;
Grantcharov, Teodor P. ;
Eriksen, Jens R. ;
Blirup, Dorthe ;
Kristiansen, Viggo B. ;
Funch-Jensen, Peter ;
Darzi, Ara .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2006, 244 (02) :310-314
[3]   Proficiency-based virtual reality training significantly reduces the error rate for residents during their first 10 laparoscopic cholecystectomies [J].
Ahlberg, Gunnar ;
Enochsson, Lars ;
Gallagher, Anthony G. ;
Hedman, Leif ;
Hogman, Christian ;
McClusky, David A., III ;
Ramel, Stig ;
Smith, C. Daniel ;
Arvidsson, Dag .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2007, 193 (06) :797-804
[4]   Laparoscopic virtual reality simulator and box trainer in gynecology [J].
Akdemir, Ali ;
Sendag, Fatih ;
Oztekin, Mehmet K. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2014, 125 (02) :181-185
[5]   Conventional box model training improves laparoscopic skills during salpingectomy on LapSim: a randomized trial [J].
Akdemir, Ali ;
Ergenoglu, Ahmet Mete ;
Yeniel, Ahmet Ozgur ;
Sendag, Fatih .
JOURNAL OF THE TURKISH-GERMAN GYNECOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, 2013, 14 (03) :157-162
[6]   Transfer of skills on LapSim virtual reality laparoscopic simulator into the operating room in urology [J].
Alwaal, Amjad ;
Al-Qaoud, Talal M. ;
Haddad, Richard L. ;
Alzahrani, Tarek M. ;
Delisle, Josee ;
Anidjar, Maurice .
UROLOGY ANNALS, 2015, 7 (02) :172-176
[7]   Evaluation of Procedural Simulation as a Training and Assessment Tool in General Surgery Simulating a Laparoscopic Appendectomy [J].
Bjerrum, Flemming ;
Strandbygaard, Jeanett ;
Rosthoj, Susanne ;
Grantcharov, Teoclor ;
Ottesen, Bent ;
Sorensen, Jette Led .
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION, 2017, 74 (02) :243-250
[8]   Augmented versus virtual reality laparoscopic simulation: What is the difference? A comparison of the ProMIS augmented reality laparoscopic simulator versus LapSim virtual reality laparoscopic simulator [J].
Botden, Sanne M. B. I. ;
Buzink, Sonja N. ;
Schijven, Marlies P. ;
Jakimowicz, Jack J. .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2007, 31 (04) :764-772
[9]   Warm-up in a Virtual Reality Environment Improves Performance in the Operating Room [J].
Calatayud, Dan ;
Arora, Sonal ;
Aggarwal, Rajesh ;
Kruglikova, Irina ;
Schulze, Svend ;
Funch-Jensen, Peter ;
Grantcharov, Teodor .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2010, 251 (06) :1181-1185
[10]   Consensus guidelines for validation of virtual reality surgical simulators [J].
Carter, FJ ;
Schijven, MP ;
Aggarwal, R ;
Grantcharov, T ;
Francis, NK ;
Hanna, GB ;
Jakimowicz, JJ .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2005, 19 (12) :1523-1532