Challenges to Brain Death in Revising the Uniform Determination of Death Act The UDDA Revision Series

被引:13
作者
Bernat, James L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Dartmouth Geisel Sch Med, Hanover, NH 03755 USA
关键词
CIRCULATORY DEATH; INFORMED-CONSENT; TESTS; LEGAL; COUNTERPOINT; DEFINITION; RATIONALE; CRITERION; DONATION; DONORS;
D O I
10.1212/WNL.0000000000207334
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Brain death, more recently called death determination by neurologic criteria,(1) is at the nexus of current controversy as the US Uniform Law Commission (ULC) seeks to revise the Uniform Determination of Death Act (UDDA). The UDDA was developed in 1980 by the ULC, then called the National Conference of Commissioners for Uniform State Laws, in conjunction with the American Bar Association, the American Medical Association, and the President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research.(2) The UDDA was designed with 2 principal goals: to enhance the uniformity of death determination among states and to codify the new determination of death based on the irreversible cessation of all functions of the brain, a condition that had been concisely and popularly, though infelicitously, termed "brain death."(3) The President's Commission's first report in 1981, Defining Death, provided the conceptual justification for the UDDA and showed how brain death determination should be best incorporated into a model statute of death.(4) The ULC effort was extremely successful because a large majority of states enacted the UDDA verbatim or with only minor modifications.(5)
引用
收藏
页码:30 / 37
页数:8
相关论文
共 58 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1968, J AMER MED ASSOC, V205, P337
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1980, UNIFORM LAW ACTS
  • [3] Legal and Ethical Considerations for Requiring Consent for Apnea Testing in Brain Death Determination
    Berkowitz, Ivor
    Garrett, Jeremy R.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2020, 20 (06) : 4 - 16
  • [4] Refinements in the Organism as a Whole Rationale for Brain Death
    Bernat, James L.
    [J]. LINACRE QUARTERLY, 2019, 86 (04) : 347 - 358
  • [5] Aligning the Criterion and Tests for Brain Death
    Bernat, James L.
    Ave, Anne L. Dalle
    [J]. CAMBRIDGE QUARTERLY OF HEALTHCARE ETHICS, 2019, 28 (04) : 635 - 641
  • [6] Whither Brain Death?
    Bernat, James L.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2014, 14 (08) : 3 - 8
  • [7] On Noncongruence between the Concept and Determination of Death
    Bernat, James L.
    [J]. HASTINGS CENTER REPORT, 2013, 43 (06) : 25 - 33
  • [8] Point: Are Donors After Circulatory Death Really Dead, and Does It Matter? Yes and Yes
    Bernat, James L.
    [J]. CHEST, 2010, 138 (01) : 13 - 16
  • [9] How the Distinction between "Irreversible" and "Permanent" Illuminates Circulatory-Respiratory Death Determination
    Bernat, James L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICINE AND PHILOSOPHY, 2010, 35 (03): : 242 - 255
  • [10] The circulatory-respiratory determination of death in organ donation
    Bernat, James L.
    Capron, Alexander M.
    Bleck, Thomas P.
    Blosser, Sandralee
    Bratton, Susan L.
    Childress, James F.
    DeVita, Michael A.
    Fulda, Gerard J.
    Gries, Cynthia J.
    Mathur, Mudit
    Nakagawa, Thomas A.
    Rushton, Cynda Hylton
    Shemie, Sam D.
    White, Douglas B.
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2010, 38 (03) : 963 - 970