Examining the theoretical positionings of data use interventions: A scoping review

被引:2
作者
Lai, Mei Kuin [1 ]
Fjortoft, Henning [2 ]
Li, Mengnan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Auckland, Fac Educ & Social Work, 74 Epsom Ave, Auckland 1023, New Zealand
[2] NTNU Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Teacher Educ, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway
关键词
Data -based decision making; Data use; Interventions; Theory; DECISION-MAKING; STUDENT-ACHIEVEMENT; PROFESSIONAL-DEVELOPMENT; MATHEMATICS; KNOWLEDGE; IMPACT; CLASSROOM; TEACHERS; GUIDANCE; BELIEFS;
D O I
10.1016/j.tate.2023.104138
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Studies of data use tend to focus on empirical work, with a corresponding lack of theorization. We conducted a scoping review drawing on hermeneutics to understand how researchers theoretically position data use interventions and how they see this positioning as contributing to improvements in student achievement. Twelve interventions were identified across 76 publications. Eight interventions did not self-identify as data use interventions. However, data use was central to their intervention, and their theoretical positionings overlapped with those that were self-identified as such. Theoretical positionings drew on assessment, content area theories, professional learning, and the theoretical underpinnings of particular research approaches. We discuss the implications of defining the field of data use.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   Predicting First-Grade Reading Performance From Kindergarten Response to Tier 1 Instruction [J].
Al Otaiba, Stephanie ;
Folsom, Jessica S. ;
Schatschneider, Christopher ;
Wanzek, Jeanne ;
Greulich, Luana ;
Meadows, Jane ;
Li, Zhi ;
Connor, Carol M. .
EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN, 2011, 77 (04) :453-470
[2]   ASSESSMENT DATA-INFORMED GUIDANCE TO INDIVIDUALIZE KINDERGARTEN READING INSTRUCTION Findings from a Cluster-Randomized Control Field Trial [J].
Al Otaiba, Stephanie ;
Connor, Carol M. ;
Folsom, Jessica S. ;
Greulich, Luana ;
Meadows, Jane ;
Li, Zhi .
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL JOURNAL, 2011, 111 (04) :535-560
[3]   Methodological Guidance Paper: The Art and Science of Quality Systematic Reviews [J].
Alexander, Patricia A. .
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2020, 90 (01) :6-23
[4]   Design-Based Research: A Decade of Progress in Education Research? [J].
Anderson, Terry ;
Shattuck, Julie .
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHER, 2012, 41 (01) :16-25
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Council of chief state school officers CCSSO
[6]  
Arksey H., 2005, INT J SOC RES METHOD, V8, P19, DOI [DOI 10.1080/1364557032000119616, 10.1080/1364557032000119616]
[7]   Developing the theory of formative assessment [J].
Black, Paul ;
Wiliam, Dylan .
EDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT EVALUATION AND ACCOUNTABILITY, 2009, 21 (01) :5-31
[8]  
Booth A., 2012, Systematic Approaches to a Successful Review
[9]   A Multistate District-Level Cluster Randomized Trial of the Impact of Data-Driven Reform on Reading and Mathematics Achievement [J].
Carlson, Deven ;
Borman, Geoffrey D. ;
Robinson, Michelle .
EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION AND POLICY ANALYSIS, 2011, 33 (03) :378-398
[10]   Scoping Reviews and Systematic Reviews: Is It an Either/Or Question? [J].
Chang, Stephanie .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2018, 169 (07) :502-503