Acute pancreatitis: A review of diagnosis, severity prediction and prognosis assessment from imaging technology, scoring system and artificial intelligence

被引:38
作者
Hu, Jian-Xiong [1 ]
Zhao, Cheng-Fei [2 ,3 ]
Wang, Shu-Ling [4 ]
Tu, Xiao-Yan [4 ]
Huang, Wei-Bin [4 ]
Chen, Jun-Nian [4 ]
Xie, Ying [5 ]
Chen, Cun-Rong [4 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Putian Univ, Affiliated Hosp, Intens Care Unit, Putian 351100, Fujian, Peoples R China
[2] Putian Univ, Sch Pharm & Med Technol, Putian 351100, Fujian, Peoples R China
[3] Putian Univ, Key Lab Pharmaceut Anal & Lab Med, Fujian 351100, Peoples R China
[4] Fujian Med Univ, Union Hosp, Dept Crit Care Med, Fuzhou 350001, Peoples R China
[5] Putian Univ, Sch Mech Elect & Informat Engn, Putian 351100, Fujian, Peoples R China
[6] Fujian Med Univ, Union Hosp, Dept Crit Care Med, 29 Xinquan Rd, Fuzhou 350001, Fujian, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Acute pancreatitis; Imaging technology; Scoring system; Artificial intelligence; Severity prediction; Prognosis assessment; HARMLESS ACUTE-PANCREATITIS; FAILURE ASSESSMENT SCORE; FLUID COLLECTIONS; BISAP SCORE; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; ORGAN FAILURE; ATLANTA CLASSIFICATION; BEDSIDE INDEX; VASCULAR INVOLVEMENT; PLEURAL EFFUSION;
D O I
10.3748/wjg.v29.i37.5268
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a potentially life-threatening inflammatory disease of the pancreas, with clinical management determined by the severity of the disease. Diagnosis, severity prediction, and prognosis assessment of AP typically involve the use of imaging technologies, such as computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and ultrasound, and scoring systems, including Ranson, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II, and Bedside Index for Severity in AP scores. Computed tomography is considered the gold standard imaging modality for AP due to its high sensitivity and specificity, while magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound can provide additional information on biliary obstruction and vascular complications. Scoring systems utilize clinical and laboratory parameters to classify AP patients into mild, moderate, or severe categories, guiding treatment decisions, such as intensive care unit admission, early enteral feeding, and antibiotic use. Despite the central role of imaging technologies and scoring systems in AP management, these methods have limitations in terms of accuracy, reproducibility, practicality and economics. Recent advancements of artificial intelligence (AI) provide new opportunities to enhance their performance by analyzing vast amounts of clinical and imaging data. AI algorithms can analyze large amounts of clinical and imaging data, identify scoring system patterns, and predict the clinical course of disease. AI-based models have shown promising results in predicting the severity and mortality of AP, but further validation and standardization are required before widespread clinical application. In addition, understanding the correlation between these three technologies will aid in developing new methods that can accurately, sensitively, and specifically be used in the diagnosis, severity prediction, and prognosis assessment of AP through complementary advantages.
引用
收藏
页码:5268 / 5291
页数:24
相关论文
共 161 条
[1]   Severe acute pancreatitis admitted to intensive care unit: SOFA is superior to Ranson's criteria and APACHE II in determining prognosis [J].
Adam, Fusun ;
Bor, Canan ;
Uyar, Mehmet ;
Demirag, Kubilay ;
Cankayali, Ilkin .
TURKISH JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2013, 24 (05) :430-435
[2]   Recognition and Importance of New Definitions of Peripancreatic Fluid Collections in Managing Patients with Acute Pancreatitis [J].
Ahmed, Akram ;
Gibreel, Waleed ;
Sarr, Michael G. .
DIGESTIVE SURGERY, 2016, 33 (04) :259-266
[3]  
Al-Qahtani HH, 2017, JCPSP-J COLL PHYSICI, V27, P75
[4]   Evaluation of the modified computed tomography severity index (MCTSI) and computed tomography severity index (CTSI) in predicting severity and clinical outcomes in acute pancreatitis [J].
Alberti, Piero ;
Pando, Elizabeth ;
Mata, Rodrigo ;
Vidal, Laura ;
Roson, Nuria ;
Mast, Richard ;
Armario, David ;
Merino, Xavier ;
Dopazo, Cristina ;
Blanco, Laia ;
Caralt, Mireia ;
Gomez, Concepcion ;
Balsells, Joaquim ;
Charco, Ramon .
JOURNAL OF DIGESTIVE DISEASES, 2021, 22 (01) :41-48
[5]   Scoring of human acute pancreatitis: state of the art [J].
Alsfasser, Guido ;
Rau, Bettina M. ;
Klar, Ernst .
LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2013, 398 (06) :789-797
[6]   Clinico-radiological comparison and short-term prognosis of single acute pancreatitis and recurrent acute pancreatitis including pancreatic volumetry [J].
Avanesov, Maxim ;
Loeser, Anastassia ;
Smagarynska, Alla ;
Keller, Sarah ;
Guerreiro, Helena ;
Tahir, Enver ;
Karul, Murat ;
Adam, Gerhard ;
Yamamura, Jin .
PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (10)
[7]   Revised Atlanta classification for CT pancreatic and peripancreatic collections in the first month of acute pancreatitis: interobserver agreement [J].
Badat, Neesmah ;
Millet, Ingrid ;
Corno, Lucie ;
Khaled, Wassef ;
Boulay-Coletta, Isabelle ;
Zins, Marc .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2019, 29 (05) :2302-2310
[8]   ACUTE-PANCREATITIS - VALUE OF CT IN ESTABLISHING PROGNOSIS [J].
BALTHAZAR, EJ ;
ROBINSON, DL ;
MEGIBOW, AJ ;
RANSON, JHC .
RADIOLOGY, 1990, 174 (02) :331-336
[9]   IMAGING AND INTERVENTION IN ACUTE-PANCREATITIS [J].
BALTHAZAR, EJ ;
FREENY, PC ;
VANSONNENBERG, E .
RADIOLOGY, 1994, 193 (02) :297-306
[10]   Classification of acute pancreatitis-2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus [J].
Banks, Peter A. ;
Bollen, Thomas L. ;
Dervenis, Christos ;
Gooszen, Hein G. ;
Johnson, Colin D. ;
Sarr, Michael G. ;
Tsiotos, Gregory G. ;
Vege, Santhi Swaroop .
GUT, 2013, 62 (01) :102-111