Calcium Dynamics, WUSCHEL Expression and Callose Deposition during Somatic Embryogenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana Immature Zygotic Embryos

被引:2
|
作者
Calabuig-Serna, Antonio [1 ]
Mir, Ricardo [1 ]
Segui-Simarro, Jose M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Valencia, COMAV Inst, Cell Biol Grp, Valencia 46022, Spain
来源
PLANTS-BASEL | 2023年 / 12卷 / 05期
关键词
2-deoxy-D-glucose; chlorpromazine; EGTA; FRET; in vitro culture; inositol; 1; 4; 5-trisphosphate; ionophore A23187; W-7; PLANT-REGENERATION; CELL FATE; GENE; CULTURES; TISSUES; GROWTH;
D O I
10.3390/plants12051021
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
In this work, we studied the induction of somatic embryogenesis in Arabidopsis using IZEs as explants. We characterized the process at the light and scanning electron microscope level and studied several specific aspects such as WUS expression, callose deposition, and principally Ca2+ dynamics during the first stages of the process of embryogenesis induction, by confocal FRET analysis with an Arabidopsis line expressing a cameleon calcium sensor. We also performed a pharmacological study with a series of chemicals know to alter calcium homeostasis (CaCl2, inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate, ionophore A23187, EGTA), the calcium-calmodulin interaction (chlorpromazine, W-7), and callose deposition (2-deoxy-D-glucose). We showed that, after determination of the cotiledonary protrusions as embryogenic regions, a finger-like appendix may emerge from the shoot apical region and somatic embryos are produced from the WUS-expressing cells of the appendix tip. Ca2+ levels increase and callose is deposited in the cells of the regions where somatic embryos will be formed, thereby constituting early markers of the embryogenic regions. We also found that Ca2+ homeostasis in this system is strictly maintained and cannot be altered to modulate embryo production, as shown for other systems. Together, these results contribute to a better knowledge and understanding of the process of induction of somatic embryos in this system.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Somatic embryogenesis in cultured immature zygotic embryos and leaf protoplasts of Arabidopsis thaliana ecotypes
    Yingkun Luo
    Hans-Ulrich Koop
    Planta, 1997, 202 : 387 - 396
  • [2] Somatic embryogenesis in cultured immature zygotic embryos and leaf protoplasts of Arabidopsis thaliana ecotypes
    Luo, YK
    Koop, HU
    PLANTA, 1997, 202 (03) : 387 - 396
  • [3] Callose Deposition Is Required for Somatic Embryogenesis in Plasmolyzed Eleutherococcus senticosus Zygotic Embryos
    Tao, Lei
    Yang, Yang
    Wang, Qiuyu
    You, Xiangling
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2012, 13 (11): : 14115 - 14126
  • [4] VASCULARIZATION OF ZYGOTIC AND SOMATIC EMBRYOS OF ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA
    Fras, Alicja
    Smolen, Barbara
    Maluszynska, Jolanta
    ACTA BIOLOGICA CRACOVIENSIA SERIES BOTANICA, 2008, 50 (02) : 43 - 48
  • [5] Somatic embryogenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana promoted by the WUSCHEL homeodomain protein
    Zuo, JR
    Niu, QW
    Frugis, G
    Chua, NH
    PLANT BIOTECHNOLOGY 2002 AND BEYOND, 2003, : 279 - 281
  • [6] SOMATIC EMBRYOGENESIS IN CULTURED IMMATURE ZYGOTIC EMBRYOS IN CHESTNUT
    VIEITEZ, FJ
    SANJOSE, MC
    BALLESTER, A
    VIEITEZ, AM
    JOURNAL OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1990, 136 (02) : 253 - 256
  • [7] SOMATIC EMBRYOGENESIS FROM IMMATURE ZYGOTIC EMBRYOS OF OIL PALM
    TEIXEIRA, JB
    SONDAHL, MR
    KIRBY, EG
    PLANT CELL TISSUE AND ORGAN CULTURE, 1993, 34 (03) : 227 - 233
  • [8] Somatic embryogenesis from immature zygotic embryos of Ginkgo biloba
    Laurain, D
    Chenieux, JC
    TremouillauxGuiller, J
    PLANT CELL TISSUE AND ORGAN CULTURE, 1996, 44 (01) : 19 - 24
  • [9] SOMATIC EMBRYOGENESIS, FORMATION OF MORPHOGENETIC CALLUS AND NORMAL DEVELOPMENT IN ZYGOTIC EMBRYOS OF ARABIDOPSIS-THALIANA INVITRO
    WU, Y
    HABERLAND, G
    ZHOU, C
    KOOP, HU
    PROTOPLASMA, 1992, 169 (3-4) : 89 - 96
  • [10] Expression of the BBM gene during somatic embryogenesis of Arabidopsis thaliana
    Kulinska-Lukaszek, K.
    Tobojka, M.
    Adamiok, A.
    Kurczynska, E. U.
    BIOLOGIA PLANTARUM, 2012, 56 (02) : 389 - 394