Exploring the Experience of a Strengths-Based Approach within a Forensic Service

被引:5
作者
Quinn, Jordan [1 ]
Cook, Andy [2 ]
Leeuwerik, Tamara [1 ]
机构
[1] Canterbury Christ Church Univ, Salomons Inst Appl Psychol, Tunbridge Wells, England
[2] Sussex Partnership NHS Fdn Trust, Forens Healthcare, Worthing, England
关键词
Good lives model; recovery; forensic mental health; community forensic team; mentally disordered offenders; secure care programme; GOOD LIVES MODEL; DISCHARGE; REHABILITATION; PERCEPTIONS; USERS; NEEDS;
D O I
10.1080/24732850.2021.2016117
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
As part of an NHS England pilot scheme, Specialist Community Forensic Teams were developed aiming to support service users' transition of care from secure forensic inpatient settings to living in the community. This study explored the experiences of service users, carers, health professionals and specialist residential accommodation providers in relation to one of these teams. The Good Lives Model was adapted by the team to inform formulation and intervention. Nineteen participants completed a mixed-methods survey. Data were processed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. Findings indicate that the use of a strengths-based model within a forensic setting was perceived by stakeholders as providing an experience of relational security and hopefulness. Most stakeholders surveyed endorsed survey items indicative of a positive experience of the service. The findings from this study suggest that GLM is an acceptable model to stakeholders for formulating the needs and strengths of service users in planning their transition from residing in secure settings to living in the community.
引用
收藏
页码:136 / 153
页数:18
相关论文
共 43 条
[21]   Do Noncontingent Incentives Increase Survey Response Rates among Mental Health Providers? A Randomized Trial Comparison [J].
Hawley, Kristin M. ;
Cook, Jonathan R. ;
Jensen-Doss, Amanda .
ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY IN MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2009, 36 (05) :343-348
[22]  
Hillbrand M, 2008, J AM ACAD PSYCHIATRY, V36, P90
[23]   A comparative study of forensic and general community psychiatric patients with integrated and parallel models of care in the UK [J].
Humber, Naomi ;
Hayes, Adrian ;
Wright, Steve ;
Fahy, Thomas ;
Shaw, Jenny .
JOURNAL OF FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY & PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 22 (02) :183-202
[24]  
Kenney-Herbert J., 2013, Standards for community forensic mental health services
[25]   What Does Success Look Like in the Forensic Mental Health System? Perspectives of Service Users and Service Providers [J].
Livingston, James D. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OFFENDER THERAPY AND COMPARATIVE CRIMINOLOGY, 2018, 62 (01) :208-228
[26]   Systematic review of 'Good Lives' assumptions and interventions [J].
Mallion, Jaimee S. ;
Wood, Jane L. ;
Mallion, Andrea .
AGGRESSION AND VIOLENT BEHAVIOR, 2020, 55
[27]  
Mental Health Taskforce, 2016, The Five Year Forward View for Mental Health NHS England
[28]   Perceptions, experiences and meanings of recovery in forensic psychiatric patients [J].
Mezey, Gillian C. ;
Kavuma, Michael ;
Turton, Penny ;
Demetriou, Alexia ;
Wright, Christine .
JOURNAL OF FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY & PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 21 (05) :683-696
[29]  
Ministry of Justice, 2018, ANN A PROV REOFF RAT
[30]   More 'milk' than 'psychology or tablets': Mental health professionals' perspectives on the value of peer support workers [J].
Moore, Timothy ;
Zeeman, Laetitia .
HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2021, 24 (02) :234-242