Fairness in Recommender Systems: Evaluation Approaches and Assurance Strategies

被引:10
作者
Wu, Yao [1 ]
Cao, Jian [1 ]
Xu, Guandong [2 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Technol Sydney, Fac Engn & Informat Technol, Data Sci & Machine Intelligence Lab, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Recommender system; fairness; survey; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1145/3604558
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
With the wide application of recommender systems, the potential impacts of recommender systems on customers, item providers and other parties have attracted increasing attention. Fairness, which is the quality of treating people equally, is also becoming important in recommender system evaluation and algorithm design. Therefore, in the past years, there has been a growing interest in fairness measurement and assurance in recommender systems. Although there are several reviews on related topics, such as fairness inmachine learning and debias in recommender systems, they do not present a systematic view on fairness in recommender systems, which is context aware and has a multi-sided meaning. Therefore, in this review, the concept of fairness is discussed in detail in the various contexts of recommender systems. Specifically, a comprehensive framework to classify fairness metrics is proposed from four dimensions, i.e., Fairness forWhom, Demographic Unit, Time Frame, and Quantification Method. Then the strategies for eliminating unfairness in recommendations, fairness in different recommendation tasks and datasets are reviewed and summarized. Finally, the challenges and future work are discussed.
引用
收藏
页数:37
相关论文
共 152 条
[1]   RecSys Challenge 2017: Offline and Online Evaluation [J].
Abel, Fabian ;
Deldjoo, Yashar ;
Elahi, Mehdi ;
Kohlsdorf, Daniel .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ELEVENTH ACM CONFERENCE ON RECOMMENDER SYSTEMS (RECSYS'17), 2017, :372-373
[2]   Improving Aggregate Recommendation Diversity Using Ranking-Based Techniques [J].
Adomavicius, Gediminas ;
Kwon, YoungOk .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON KNOWLEDGE AND DATA ENGINEERING, 2012, 24 (05) :896-911
[3]   Context-aware Target Apps Selection and Recommendation for Enhancing Personal Mobile Assistants [J].
Aliannejadi, Mohammad ;
Zamani, Hamed ;
Crestani, Fabio ;
Croft, W. Bruce .
ACM TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2021, 39 (03)
[4]   What is the point of equality? [J].
Anderson, ES .
ETHICS, 1999, 109 (02) :287-337
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2012, P 21 INT C WORLD WID
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2011, P 5 ACM C REC SYST C
[7]   Fairness metrics and bias mitigation strategies for rating predictions [J].
Ashokan, Ashwathy ;
Haas, Christian .
INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, 2021, 58 (05)
[8]   Fairness in Recommendation Ranking through Pairwise Comparisons [J].
Beutel, Alex ;
Chen, Jilin ;
Doshi, Tulsee ;
Qian, Hai ;
Wei, Li ;
Wu, Yi ;
Heldt, Lukasz ;
Zhao, Zhe ;
Hong, Lichan ;
Chi, Ed H. ;
Goodrow, Cristos .
KDD'19: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 25TH ACM SIGKDD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY AND DATA MINING, 2019, :2212-2220
[9]   Equity of Attention: Amortizing Individual Fairness in Rankings [J].
Biega, Asia J. ;
Gummadi, Krishna P. ;
Weikum, Gerhard .
ACM/SIGIR PROCEEDINGS 2018, 2018, :405-414
[10]  
Black D., 1993, Sociological Justice