A Physics-Constrained Bayesian neural network for battery remaining useful life prediction

被引:26
作者
Najera-Flores, David A. [1 ,3 ]
Hu, Zhen [2 ]
Chadha, Mayank [1 ]
Todd, Michael D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Struct Engn, 9500 Gilman Dr, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[2] Univ Michigan Dearborn, Dept Ind & Mfg Syst Engn, Dearborn, MI 48128 USA
[3] ATA Engn Inc, 13290 Evening Creek Dr S, San Diego, CA 92128 USA
关键词
Battery; Remaining useful life; Prognostics; Bayesian neural net; Physics constraint; UNIVERSAL APPROXIMATION; NONLINEAR OPERATORS; ION; PROGNOSTICS; STATE; MODEL; FRAMEWORK; FILTER;
D O I
10.1016/j.apm.2023.05.038
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In order to predict the remaining useful life (RUL) of lithium-ion batteries, a capacity degradation model may be developed using either simplified physical laws or machine learning-based methods. It is observed that even though degradation models based on simplified physical laws are easy to implement, they may result in large error in the appli-cation of failure prognostics. While data-driven prognostics models can provide more ac-curate degradation forecasting, they may require a large volume of training data and may invoke predictions inconsistent with physical laws. It is also very challenging for existing methods to predict the RUL at the early stages of battery life. In this paper, we propose a Bayesian physics-constrained neural network for battery RUL prediction by overcoming limitations of the current methods. In the proposed method, a neural differential operator is learned from the first 100 cycles of data. The neural differential operator is modeled with a Bayesian neural network architecture that separates the fixed history dependence from the time dependence to isolate epistemic uncertainty quantification. Using the bat-tery dataset presented in the paper by Severson et al. as an example, we compare our proposed method with a simplified physics-based degradation forecasting model and two data-driven prognostics models. The results show that the proposed physics-constrained neural network can provide more accurate RUL estimation than the other methods with the same group of training data. Most importantly, the proposed method allows for RUL prediction at earlier stages of the battery life cycle.& COPY; 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:42 / 59
页数:18
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]   Particle-filtering-based failure prognosis via sigma-points: Application to Lithium-Ion battery State-of-Charge monitoring [J].
Acuna, David E. ;
Orchard, Marcos E. .
MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2017, 85 :827-848
[2]   Unifying Model-Based Prognosis With Learning-Based Time-Series Prediction Methods: Application to Li-Ion Battery [J].
Aggab, Toufik ;
Avila, Manuel ;
Vrignat, Pascal ;
Kratz, Frederic .
IEEE SYSTEMS JOURNAL, 2021, 15 (04) :5245-5254
[3]   Prognostics of Lithium-Ion batteries using knowledge-constrained machine learning and Kalman filtering [J].
Bai, Guangxing ;
Su, Yunsheng ;
Rahman, Maliha Maisha ;
Wang, Zequn .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2023, 231
[4]  
Blundell C, 2015, Arxiv, DOI [arXiv:1505.05424, DOI 10.48550/ARXIV.1505.05424]
[5]   State-of-life prognosis and diagnosis of lithium-ion batteries by data-driven particle filters [J].
Cadini, F. ;
Sbarufatti, C. ;
Cancelliere, F. ;
Giglio, M. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2019, 235 :661-672
[6]   Remaining Useful Life Estimation for Prognostics of Lithium-Ion Batteries Based on Recurrent Neural Network [J].
Catelani, Marcantonio ;
Ciani, Lorenzo ;
Fantacci, Romano ;
Patrizi, Gabriele ;
Picano, Benedetta .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT, 2021, 70
[7]   Fusing physics-based and deep learning models for prognostics [J].
Chao, Manuel Arias ;
Kulkarni, Chetan ;
Goebel, Kai ;
Fink, Olga .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2022, 217
[8]  
Chaochao Chen, 2012, 2012 Proceedings of the IEEE 2012 Prognostics and System Health Management Conference (PHM 2012), DOI 10.1109/PHM.2012.6228850
[9]   UNIVERSAL APPROXIMATION TO NONLINEAR OPERATORS BY NEURAL NETWORKS WITH ARBITRARY ACTIVATION FUNCTIONS AND ITS APPLICATION TO DYNAMICAL-SYSTEMS [J].
CHEN, TP ;
CHEN, H .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL NETWORKS, 1995, 6 (04) :911-917
[10]  
Cybenko G., 1989, Mathematics of Control, Signals, and Systems, V2, P303, DOI 10.1007/BF02551274