Prediction accuracy of Random Forest, XGBoost, LightGBM, and artificial neural network for shear resistance of post-installed anchors

被引:31
作者
Suenaga, D. [1 ]
Takase, Y. [1 ]
Abe, T. [2 ]
Orita, G. [2 ]
Ando, S. [3 ]
机构
[1] Muroran Inst Technol, Muroran, Hokkaido, Japan
[2] Tobishima Corp, Chiba, Japan
[3] Sumitomo Osaka Cement Co Ltd, Chiba, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
Post-installed anchor; Post-installed reinforcing bar; Machine learning; Mechanical behavior; Dowel action; HIGH-STRENGTH CONCRETE; ELASTIC-MODULUS; DOWEL ACTION; MACHINE;
D O I
10.1016/j.istruc.2023.02.066
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Post-installed anchors and reinforcing bars are used to connect equipment or to fasten strengthening members to reinforced concrete (RC) structures. For safety reasons, appropriate structural design is critical. Recently, arti-ficial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) have been applied in various fields. According to previous studies, the bending strength of the RC beam and the bond strength of the surface can be predicted using ML. In this study, the mechanical behavior of post-installed anchors subjected to shear force were predicted using ML. Four algorithms were applied in this study: Random Forest (RF), XGBoost (XB), LightGBM (LG), and an artificial neural network (ANN). Moreover, the authors' previous test results were used for the ML and testing. The number of specimens was thirty-two. The test parameters were the concrete compressive strength fc, diameter of the anchor bolt dd, type of adhesive, and tensile ratio rN. The values for fc and dd were set at 13.0-35.5 N/mm2 and 13-25 mm, respectively. In this study, one epoxy adhesive and three cement-based adhesives were used. rN, which is the ratio of the tensile stress to yield strength of the anchor bolt, was set to 0, 0.33, and 0.66. Conse-quently, the four algorithms could accurately predict the mechanical behavior of the specimen when the pa-rameters were within or close to the training data. However, the prediction agreements of RF, XB, and LG were not good for the behavior of specimens whose parameters were not included in the training data. Nevertheless, the ANN was able to reasonably predict the behavior of these cases. It was concluded that the four algorithms can make good predictions when the parameters are within or close to the training data. However, when parameters outside the training data were used, the ANN was the best of the four algorithms used in this study.
引用
收藏
页码:1252 / 1263
页数:12
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Prediction of rapid chloride penetration resistance of metakaolin based high strength concrete using light GBM and XGBoost models by incorporating SHAP analysis [J].
Alabdullah, Anas Abdulalim ;
Iqbal, Mudassir ;
Zahid, Muhammad ;
Khan, Kaffayatullah ;
Amin, Muhammad Nasir ;
Jalal, Fazal E. .
CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2022, 345
[2]   Importance of performance certification for post-installed anchors: An experimental assessment [J].
Alhaidary, Haidar ;
Al-Tamimi, Adil K. .
STRUCTURES, 2021, 29 :273-285
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-14) and Commentary (ACI 318R-14)
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2012, 001 ETAG EUR ORG TEC
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2019, 36016 AISC
[6]   Random forests [J].
Breiman, L .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) :5-32
[7]   LightGBM-PPI: Predicting protein-protein interactions through LightGBM with multi-information fusion [J].
Chen, Cheng ;
Zhang, Qingmei ;
Ma, Qin ;
Yu, Bin .
CHEMOMETRICS AND INTELLIGENT LABORATORY SYSTEMS, 2019, 191 :54-64
[8]   XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System [J].
Chen, Tianqi ;
Guestrin, Carlos .
KDD'16: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 22ND ACM SIGKDD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY AND DATA MINING, 2016, :785-794
[9]   Prediction of elastic modulus of normal and high strength concrete by artificial neural networks [J].
Demir, Fuat .
CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2008, 22 (07) :1428-1435
[10]  
Eota tr069, 2019, TR069 EOTA