L2 acquisition and L1 attrition of VOTs of voiceless plosives in highly proficient late bilinguals

被引:1
作者
Alharbi, Amirah Saud [1 ]
Foltz, Anouschka [2 ]
Kornder, Lisa [2 ]
Mennen, Ineke [2 ]
机构
[1] Umm Al Qura Univ, Mecca, Saudi Arabia
[2] Karl Franzens Univ Graz, Graz, Austria
关键词
bilinguals; first language attrition; markedness; phonetic similarity; second language acquisition; voice onset time; 1ST LANGUAGE ATTRITION; ONSET-TIME; VOICING CONTRAST; FOREIGN ACCENT; PHONETIC DRIFT; CROSS-LANGUAGE; ENGLISH BILINGUALS; SEGMENTAL FEATURES; LARYNGEAL CONTRAST; DUTCH SPEAKERS;
D O I
10.1177/02676583221124011
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
While much research has examined second language (L2) phonetic acquisition, less research has examined first language (L1) attrition in terms of the voice onset time (VOT) of voiceless stops. The current study examined L2 acquisition and L1 attrition in the VOT of word-initial voiceless stops among late English-Arabic and Arabic-English bilinguals in order to explore the role of phonetic similarity in L2 acquisition and L1 attrition of speech. The study included 60 participants: 15 monolingual Arabic speakers, 15 monolingual English speakers, 15 English-Arabic bilinguals and 15 Arabic-English bilinguals. The bilinguals had been living in their L2 environment for more than 15 years. The participants narrated two cartoons in Arabic and/or three in English. The monolingual groups' results revealed clear cross-language differences in the VOT of voiceless plosives between the two languages. Phonetic similarity affected L2 acquisition in that those L2 sounds that were close in phonetic space to L1 sounds (i.e. /t/ and /k/) were more difficult to acquire than those that were dissimilar to L1 sounds (i.e. /p/). However, L1 attrition showed an asymmetric pattern, occurring only in the English-Arabic bilinguals' productions of the English /k/. We suggest that markedness might contribute to explaining this asymmetry.
引用
收藏
页码:1133 / 1163
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   The basic continuity hypothesis of L1 to L2 production [J].
Romano, Francesco .
SECOND LANGUAGE RESEARCH, 2018, 34 (03) :275-308
[32]   BOUND STEM PROCESSING IN L1 AND L2 ITALIAN [J].
Piccinin, Sabrina ;
Dal Maso, Serena ;
Giraudo, Helene .
LINGUE E LINGUAGGIO, 2018, 17 (02) :289-305
[33]   VOT in English by bilinguals with 2L1s: different approaches to voiceless and voiced stops [J].
Liu, Sha ;
Takeda, Kaye .
FOLIA LINGUISTICA, 2024, 58 (02) :327-360
[34]   Selectivity in L2-induced L1 attrition:: a psycholinguistic account [J].
Gürel, A .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLINGUISTICS, 2004, 17 (01) :53-78
[35]   Bidirectionality in bilingualism? Asymmetry in L1 Spanish-L2 English vs. L1 English-L2 Spanish bilinguals [J].
Quesada, Teresa ;
Lozano, Cristobal .
LINGUA, 2025, 317
[36]   L1 vowel perceptual boundary shift as a result of L2 vowel learning [J].
Takahashi, Chikako .
JOURNAL OF PHONETICS, 2023, 100
[38]   Refusals in Chinese: How Do L1 and L2 Differ? [J].
Hong, Wei .
FOREIGN LANGUAGE ANNALS, 2011, 44 (01) :122-136
[39]   Connectivity effects in pseudoclefts in L1 and L2 speakers of German [J].
Drummer, Janna-Deborah ;
Felser, Claudia .
SECOND LANGUAGE RESEARCH, 2024, 40 (02) :377-397
[40]   Prediction and integration of semantics during L2 and L1 listening [J].
Dijkgraaf, Aster ;
Hartsuiker, Robert J. ;
Duyck, Wouter .
LANGUAGE COGNITION AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2019, 34 (07) :881-900