Bi-objective Bayesian optimization of engineering problems with cheap and expensive cost functions

被引:15
作者
Loka, Nasrulloh [1 ]
Couckuyt, Ivo [1 ]
Garbuglia, Federico [1 ]
Spina, Domenico [1 ]
Van Nieuwenhuyse, Inneke [2 ]
Dhaene, Tom [1 ]
机构
[1] Ghent Univ Imec, Dept Informat Technol INTEC, IDLab, iGent, Techno Pk Zwijnaarde 126, B-9052 Ghent, Belgium
[2] Hasselt Univ, Res Grp Logist, Agoralaan Gebouw D, B-3590 Limburg, Belgium
关键词
Multi-objective optimization; Bayesian optimization; Hypervolume; Gaussian process; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; EXPECTED IMPROVEMENT; SURROGATE MODEL; ALGORITHM; DESIGN; PAREGO;
D O I
10.1007/s00366-021-01573-7
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Multi-objective optimization of complex engineering systems is a challenging problem. The design goals can exhibit dynamic and nonlinear behaviour with respect to the system's parameters. Additionally, modern engineering is driven by simulation-based design which can be computationally expensive due to the complexity of the system under study. Bayesian optimization (BO) is a popular technique to tackle this kind of problem. In multi-objective BO, a data-driven surrogate model is created for each design objective. However, not all of the objectives may be expensive to compute. We develop an approach that can deal with a mix of expensive and cheap-to-evaluate objective functions. As a result, the proposed technique offers lower complexity than standard multi-objective BO methods and performs significantly better when the cheap objective function is difficult to approximate. In particular, we extend the popular hypervolume-based Expected Improvement (EI) and Probability of Improvement (POI) in bi-objective settings. The proposed methods are validated on multiple benchmark functions and two real-world engineering design optimization problems, showing that it performs better than its non-cheap counterparts. Furthermore, it performs competitively or better compared to other optimization methods.
引用
收藏
页码:1923 / 1933
页数:11
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
Astudillo R, 2017, 31 C NEUR INF PROC S, P5
[2]  
Belakaria S, 2019, ADV NEUR IN, V32
[3]  
Bergstra J., 2011, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, V24, P2546
[4]   SMS-EMOA: Multiobjective selection based on dominated hypervolume [J].
Beume, Nicola ;
Naujoks, Boris ;
Emmerich, Michael .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2007, 181 (03) :1653-1669
[5]   Uncertainty quantification and reliability analysis by an adaptive sparse Bayesian inference based PCE model [J].
Bhattacharyya, Biswarup .
ENGINEERING WITH COMPUTERS, 2022, 38 (SUPPL 2) :1437-1458
[6]   Evolutionary multiobjective optimization: open research areas and some challenges lying ahead [J].
Coello Coello, Carlos A. ;
Gonzalez Brambila, Silvia ;
Figueroa Gamboa, Josue ;
Castillo Tapia, Ma Guadalupe ;
Hernandez Gomez, Raquel .
COMPLEX & INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2020, 6 (02) :221-236
[7]   Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of Aircraft Wings Using Panel Methods [J].
Conlan-Smith, Cian ;
Ramos-Garcia, Nestor ;
Sigmund, Ole ;
Andreasen, Casper Schousboe .
AIAA JOURNAL, 2020, 58 (09) :3765-3776
[8]   Towards Efficient Multiobjective Optimization: Multiobjective Statistical Criterions [J].
Couckuyt, Ivo ;
Deschrijver, Dirk ;
Dhaene, Tom .
2012 IEEE CONGRESS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION (CEC), 2012,
[9]   Fast calculation of multiobjective probability of improvement and expected improvement criteria for Pareto optimization [J].
Couckuyt, Ivo ;
Deschrijver, Dirk ;
Dhaene, Tom .
JOURNAL OF GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION, 2014, 60 (03) :575-594
[10]   Joint strength optimization by the mixed-adhesive technique [J].
da Silva, Lucas F. M. ;
Lopes, Maria Joao C. Q. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADHESION AND ADHESIVES, 2009, 29 (05) :509-514