Knowledge retention in oil and gas industry - the case of contract workforce

被引:3
作者
Sumbal, M. Saleem Ullah Khan [1 ,2 ]
Irfan, Irfan [1 ,3 ]
Durst, Susanne [4 ]
Sahibzada, Umar Farooq [5 ]
Waseem, Muhammad Adnan [1 ]
Tsui, Eric [6 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Sci & Technol NUST, Dept HR & Management, NUST Business Sch, Islamabad, Pakistan
[2] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Ind & Syst Engn, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Agder, Kristiansand, Norway
[4] Tallinn Univ Technol, Tallinn, Estonia
[5] Northwestern Polytech Univ, Xian, Peoples R China
[6] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Univ Learning Hub, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Contract workforce; Knowledge retention; Knowledge loss; Knowledge risks; Oil and gas; MANAGEMENT; CAPABILITIES; RESPONSES; RISKS; LEAVE;
D O I
10.1108/K-06-2021-0458
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Purpose The purpose of this article is to investigate how organization retain the knowledge of Contract Workforce (CWF) and to understand the associated challenges in this regard. Design/methodology/approach Adopting an inductive approach, 15 semi-structured interviews were conducted with senior managers, project heads and consultants working in leading oil and gas companies across eight countries (USA, Australia, UAE, KSA, Pakistan, UK, Thailand and Russia). Thematic analysis was carried out to analyze the data collected. Findings CWF appears to be a significant source of knowledge attrition and even knowledge loss in the oil and gas sector. There are various risks associated with hiring of CWF, such as hallowing of organizational memory, repeated training of contractors, no knowledge base, workforce shortage among others which can impede the knowledge retention capability of O&G companies in the context of contract workforce. Various knowledge retention strategies for CWF have been revealed, however, there is interplay of various factors such as proportion of CWF deployed, proper resource utilization, cross-functional multi-level teams' involvement and strength of transactional ties. Maintaining strong relationships (Transactional ties) is crucial to maintain a virtual organizational memory (partial knowledge retention) and to follow a adopting a rehired when required policy. Originality/value The knowledge retention issue in the context of CWF has not be addressed in past researches. This article attempts to fill this gap.
引用
收藏
页码:1552 / 1571
页数:20
相关论文
共 70 条
  • [1] Consequences of outsourcing for organizational capabilities Some experiences from best practice
    Agndal, Henrik
    Nordin, Fredrik
    [J]. BENCHMARKING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2009, 16 (03) : 316 - 334
  • [2] Review:: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems:: Conceptual foundations and research issues
    Alavi, M
    Leidner, DE
    [J]. MIS QUARTERLY, 2001, 25 (01) : 107 - 136
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2015, ENCY GEROPSYCHOLOGY
  • [4] The role of relationship scope in sustaining relational contracts in interfirm networks
    Argyres, Nicholas
    Bercovitz, Janet
    Zanarone, Giorgio
    [J]. STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2020, 41 (02) : 222 - 245
  • [5] Strategic responses to shocks: Comparative adjustment costs, transaction costs, and opportunity costs
    Argyres, Nicholas
    Mahoney, Joseph T.
    Nickerson, Jackson
    [J]. STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2019, 40 (03) : 357 - 376
  • [6] Ball K., 2011, Surviving the Baby Boomer exodus: Capturing knowledge from Gen X and Y employees
  • [7] Workforce-related risks in projects with a contingent workforce
    Becker, Karen
    Smidt, Michelle
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2015, 33 (04) : 889 - 900
  • [8] Barriers to tacit knowledge retention: An understanding of the perceptions of the knowledge management of people inside and outside the organisation
    Bessick, Jacky
    Naicker, Visvanathan
    [J]. SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2013, 15 (02):
  • [9] Bettis R., 1992, ACAD MANAGE EXEC, V6, P7
  • [10] Mitigating Knowledge Loss A Strategic Imperative for Nurse Leaders
    Bleich, Michael R.
    Cleary, Brenda L.
    Davis, Kathleen
    Hatcher, Barbara J.
    Hewlett, Peggy O.
    Hill, Karen S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NURSING ADMINISTRATION, 2009, 39 (04): : 160 - 164