Use of the modified Schirmer test to measure salivary gland hypofunction/hyposalivation: Systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:1
作者
Schoppmeier, Christoph Matthias [1 ,2 ]
Janson, Malin [1 ,3 ]
Hoefer, Karolin [1 ,2 ]
Graf, Isabelle [1 ,4 ]
Wicht, Michael Jochen [1 ,2 ]
Barbe, Anna Greta [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cologne, Fac Med, Kerpener Str 32, D-50931 Cologne, Germany
[2] Univ Cologne, Univ Hosp Cologne, Polyclin Operat Dent & Periodontol, Kerpener Str 32, D-50931 Cologne, Germany
[3] Univ Cologne, Univ Hosp Cologne, Polyclin Prosthet Dent, Cologne, Germany
[4] Univ Cologne, Univ Hosp Cologne, Dept Orthodont, Cologne, Germany
关键词
hyposalivation; mouth dryness; salivary flow rates; xerostomia; DRY MOUTH; FLOW-RATE; XEROSTOMIA; ANTIDEPRESSANTS; HEALTH; TOOL;
D O I
10.1111/eos.12977
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Although dry mouth is a relatively common condition, salivary flow is not routinely measured in dental clinical practice. Moreover, existing data regarding the use of the modified Schirmer test (MST) for the screening of dry mouth has not been summarized. This systematic review and meta-analysis, conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines, aimed to determine whether the modified Schirmer test can be used to identify dry mouth. The databases of PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and CENTRAL (CRD42023393843) were systematically searched to retrieve articles published until 9th November 2023. Among the 343 original articles retrieved, six met the inclusion criteria. A total of 1150 patients, comprising 710 (61.7%) women and 440 (38.3%) men (mean age, 47.1 +/- 7.3 years), were included. The meta-analysis revealed a weak correlation coefficient of r over bar $\bar{r}$ = 0.42 (95% Cl: 0.29-0.55) between MST and the unstimulated salivary flow rate. Therefore, while the MST might offer a simple and accessible alternative for initial screening in the future, especially in non-specialized settings, its variability in sensitivity and specificity, along with an actual lack of standardization, necessitates cautious interpretation. Further studies are necessary before recommending the test in clinical routine.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Quality assessment tool for before-after (pre-post) studies with no control group
[2]  
Bansal, 2014, J ORAL HLTH RES, V5, P1
[3]   OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS OF A BANK CORRELATION TEST FOR PUBLICATION BIAS [J].
BEGG, CB ;
MAZUMDAR, M .
BIOMETRICS, 1994, 50 (04) :1088-1101
[4]   Using the modified Schirmer test to measure mouth dryness - A preliminary study [J].
Chen, A ;
Wai, Y ;
Lee, L ;
Lake, S ;
Woo, SB .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 136 (02) :164-170
[5]   SOME METHODS FOR STRENGTHENING THE COMMON X2 TESTS [J].
COCHRAN, WG .
BIOMETRICS, 1954, 10 (04) :417-451
[6]   Beyond PICO: The SPIDER Tool for Qualitative Evidence Synthesis [J].
Cooke, Alison ;
Smith, Debbie ;
Booth, Andrew .
QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2012, 22 (10) :1435-1443
[7]  
Cribari-Neto F, 2010, J STAT SOFTW, V34, P1
[8]   How much saliva is enough for avoidance of xerostomia? [J].
Dawes, C .
CARIES RESEARCH, 2004, 38 (03) :236-240
[9]   The influence of xerostomia after radiotherapy on quality of life [J].
Dirix, Piet ;
Nuyts, Sandra ;
Poorten, Vincent Vander ;
Delaere, Pierre ;
Van den Bogaert, Walter .
SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2008, 16 (02) :171-179
[10]   Health benefits of saliva: a review [J].
Dodds, MWJ ;
Johnson, DA ;
Yeh, CK .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2005, 33 (03) :223-233