Capturing Symmetrical and Asymmetrical Volatility in the Energy Market: Evidence of COVID-19 Outbreak and Russia Ukraine Saga

被引:4
作者
Tabassum, Sabia [1 ]
Yadav, Miklesh Prasad [2 ]
Yadav, Sangeeta [3 ]
Al-Qudah, Anas Ali [4 ]
机构
[1] Amity Univ, Amity Business Sch, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
[2] Indian Inst Foreign Trade IIFT, Kakinada 533001, Andhra Pradesh, India
[3] New Delhi Inst Management NDIM, New Delhi, India
[4] Liwa Coll Technol, Fac Business, Abu Dhabi, U Arab Emirates
关键词
Energy market; symmetrical volatility; asymmetrical volatility; leverage effect; STOCK MARKETS; OIL; CONNECTEDNESS; INDEXES; MODELS; IMPACT; NEWS;
D O I
10.1177/23197145231176113
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study is to capture the symmetrical and asymmetrical volatility of the energy market in India and USA during COVID-19 and Russia-Ukraine invasion. To distinguish between COVID-19 and Russia-Ukraine invasion tenure, the periods 31 December to 23 February 2022 and 24 February 2022 to January 2023 were considered. The proxies for crude oil and natural gas in India are MCX ICOMDEX (MCICRD) and MCX ICOMDEX (MNGc1), respectively. The proxies for crude oil and natural gas in India are MCX ICOMDEX (MCICRD) and MCX ICOMDEX (MNGc1) respectively while BZ:NMX and NGH2 are taken to measure the US crude oil and natural gas respectively. The standard generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity and exponential generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity are employed to capture the volatility. We observe that each series captures the new information derived from the COVID-19 outbreak and Russia-Ukraine invasion as the alpha values of these series are positive and significant. Additionally, there is the persistence of the volatility in these series as their beta values are positive and significant but leverage effect is only found during Russia-Ukraine invasion in Indian crude oil market. This article offers implications to policy makers, investors and portfolio managers.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 64 条
[51]   Natural gas consumption, energy efficiency and low carbon transition in Pakistan [J].
Raza, Muhammad Yousaf ;
Lin, Boqiang .
ENERGY, 2022, 240
[52]   Oil shocks and stock market volatility of the BRICS: A GARCH-MIDAS approach [J].
Salisu, Afees A. ;
Gupta, Rangan .
GLOBAL FINANCE JOURNAL, 2021, 48
[53]   WHY DOES STOCK-MARKET VOLATILITY CHANGE OVER TIME [J].
SCHWERT, GW .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1989, 44 (05) :1115-1153
[54]   Good and bad uncertainty: Macroeconomic and financial market implications [J].
Segal, Gill ;
Shaliastovich, Ivan ;
Yaron, Amir .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2015, 117 (02) :369-397
[55]   Comparison of linear and non-linear GARCH models for forecasting volatility of select emerging countries [J].
Sharma, Sudhi ;
Aggarwal, Vaibhav ;
Yadav, Miklesh Prasad .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN MANAGEMENT RESEARCH, 2021, 18 (04) :526-547
[56]   Asymmetric volatility transmission between the real exchange rate and stock returns in South Africa [J].
Sikhosana, Ayanda ;
Aye, Goodness C. .
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND POLICY, 2018, 60 :1-8
[57]  
Srinivasan P., 2010, Asia Pacific Business Review, V6, P47, DOI DOI 10.1177/097324701000600304
[58]   Asymmetric volatility connectedness between Islamic stock and commodity markets [J].
Suleman, Muhammad Tahir ;
McIver, Ron ;
Kang, Sang Hoon .
GLOBAL FINANCE JOURNAL, 2021, 49
[59]   The effect of COVID-19 pandemic on global stock market volatility: Can economic strength help to manage the uncertainty? [J].
Uddin, Moshfique ;
Chowdhury, Anup ;
Anderson, Keith ;
Chaudhuri, Kausik .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2021, 128 :31-44
[60]   Asymmetric volatility structure of equity returns: Evidence from an emerging market [J].
Umar, Muhammad ;
Mirza, Nawazish ;
Rizvi, Syed Kumail Abbas ;
Furqan, Mehreen .
QUARTERLY REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2023, 87 :330-336